Mark Labovitch Comment (1 Viewer)

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I found this comment at the SGC of his very strange:

ML – I think the Judicial Review hearing is likely to show that there was a conspiracy to wrest control of the club in a way that was going to do damage to the club. Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion.


Is this not what he claims Sisu and CCC were planning to do to ACL and Yorkshire Bank?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Is that actually against the law?

Wouldn't me and a mate setting up a restaurant be illegal because we're plotting to take business from other restaurants?

Is Mark Labovitch actually sane?
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
Is that actually against the law?

Wouldn't me and a mate setting up a restaurant be illegal because we're plotting to take business from other restaurants?

Is Mark Labovitch actually sane?


He just spouts rubbish continually in the hope that certain folk will believe it as 'evidence'
 

Godiva

Well-Known Member
He just spouts rubbish continually in the hope that certain folk will believe it as 'evidence'

That's a bit harsh on bigfatronssba ...
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

dancers lance

Well-Known Member
' Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion'

What two parties conspired to damage what business? surely one business made a move to protect itself from a business that had already declared itself damaged and financially unviable?
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
Watch it cloughie......he has a little black book and I think that your name has just gone into it. :(

It has been for a long time,I do have to keep looking over my shoulder,

as stalkers are becoming more prevalent nowadays
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Funnily enough it has been mentioned before. Maybe you meant "sorry if this has only been mention a gazillion times before"?
 

ccfclinney

Well-Known Member
' Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion'

What two parties conspired to damage what business? surely one business made a move to protect itself from a business that had already declared itself damaged and financially unviable?

I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc

I was always taught never to throw stones in glass houses - for a company that seemingly flies by the seat of it's pants and runs on the rim of legality to accuse others of illegality seems, shall we say, hypocritical??
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc

I await the outcome of the counterclaim Otium/Sisu/Cardoza/Football League/Tim/Joy any combination could be applied. You understand that I am not making any allegations however what if ACL decided to go down that route?
 

skybluericoh

Well-Known Member
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I found this comment at the SGC of his very strange:

ML – I think the Judicial Review hearing is likely to show that there was a conspiracy to wrest control of the club in a way that was going to do damage to the club. Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion.


Is this not what he claims Sisu and CCC were planning to do to ACL and Yorkshire Bank?

Like a company appointing it's own administrator,who then could not find business paperwork that had serious implications of the company's worth to any interested party, until after the administrator sold the company to another company owned by the same off shore holding company that owned the 1st? Even if they win the JR on sum technicality, they are in bed with the devil in my eyes.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc

But weren't they claiming that they had, with the council, come up with a plan to falsely give YB the impression that ACL were in financial problems so they could buy the mortgage from them on the cheap. Surely that law, if it exists would apply there.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
I thought he was talking about himself, or astute.

It's a good job you don't have any mates. You keep making false allegations against ACL/CCC/Higgs. The latest one was your normal one which you keep regurgitating about ACL charging 10k for the charity match to be played. You know it isn't true........but at least it is a Grendull fact.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Dont put the spotlight on yourself and Mr Fisher, Mr Labovitch....you both might not stand up to the scrutiny?
Two people...conspire...damage....company....illegal? What like failing to publish accounts?
 

@richh87

Member
Have a feeling its end of Feb, 28th rings a bell?

I hope you're right, but I haven't seen it announced, and my gut feeling is that this will be going through the courts for years to come, with appeal after appeal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Provided they didn't alter the terms of the tenancy agreement or incomes of the football club; I can't see any way that CCC and ACL could collude to the detriment of SISU's business. I really can't. Can anyone give me a candid example of what they could muster between them?!?
 

thaiskyblue

New Member
Provided they didn't alter the terms of the tenancy agreement or incomes of the football club; I can't see any way that CCC and ACL could collude to the detriment of SISU's business. I really can't. Can anyone give me a candid example of what they could muster between them?!?
Cue Grendell !
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Cue Grendell !

Oh Lord. It was a sensible question. It deserves better than that baffoon trampling all over it with his insanity boots on.

I guess I should also prepare myself to be called a number of terms normally associated with a lady's reproductive organ, once the GMKers have finished their Coco Pops...
 

The Prefect

Active Member
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I found this comment at the SGC of his very strange:

ML – I think the Judicial Review hearing is likely to show that there was a conspiracy to wrest control of the club in a way that was going to do damage to the club. Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion.

As a comment this is priceless.

What about the conspiracy between Coventry City Football Club and SISU Capital to damage ACL?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top