Lets say Maddison is sold to Everton for 25m and Norwich negotiate a sell on clause of say 15% above 25m. Do we receive a percentage of Norwich's future income from JM?
Edit. Still cant get my head around 20-25m. Seems like the steal of the season for whomever gets him.
Talk of Grealish going from Villa for 40m, I don't see a great deal of difference between the two players, I certainly wouldn't say that Grealish is twice as good as Maddison.
Whilst I'd normally agree with this, the line that we were fed (and it's not like SISU to tell us liesDeals aren't usually set up this way
There is only a percentage of the next sell on price for young players in most transfers
And there may be other payments in case of England call ups, Premier League appearances and so on
The first buying club would add these to any deal when they sold the player on as they'd still be responsible for these payments
Knowing SISU, an 'investment in his entire career' probably just means we agreed to the sell on % fee being payable over 15 years.Whilst I'd normally agree with this, the line that we were fed (and it's not like SISU to tell us lies) was that we had an investment in his entire career. I assume the sell on now, means we could miss out on England caps, promotions etc. Be nice to see what the exact deal was and as it would at some point appear on a balance sheet, I don't understand the secrecy still surrounding it.
I'd imagine Norwich would still be obliged to pay for England caps etc (as Better Days says its likely Norwich would include these obligations as part of the sale)Whilst I'd normally agree with this, the line that we were fed (and it's not like SISU to tell us lies) was that we had an investment in his entire career. I assume the sell on now, means we could miss out on England caps, promotions etc. Be nice to see what the exact deal was and as it would at some point appear on a balance sheet, I don't understand the secrecy still surrounding it.
On the subject of caps I saw George Thomas made an appearance for Wales last week first cap I think wonder if we get anything for that ?I'd imagine Norwich would still be obliged to pay for England caps etc (as Better Days says its likely Norwich would include these obligations as part of the sale)
Sorry I should have made it clearerWhilst I'd normally agree with this, the line that we were fed (and it's not like SISU to tell us lies) was that we had an investment in his entire career. I assume the sell on now, means we could miss out on England caps, promotions etc. Be nice to see what the exact deal was and as it would at some point appear on a balance sheet, I don't understand the secrecy still surrounding it.
3 bags of walkers crispsOn the subject of caps I saw George Thomas made an appearance for Wales last week first cap I think wonder if we get anything for that ?
The £22m quoted seems cheap in this market especially from a club like Everton. I would bet that Norwich would have additional clauses in this deal to cover anything that they would owe us.Sorry I should have made it clearer
All the clauses about England caps. Premier League etc. will still apply
Norwich will have to include them in the contract for the sale to Everton, Leicester or whoever it is that buys Madders
Well yeah, that’s what I was told 22 million + add onsThe £22m quoted seems cheap in this market especially from a club like Everton. I would bet that Norwich would have additional clauses in this deal to cover anything that they would owe us.
Well yeah, that’s what I was told 22 million + add ons
Whatever Chris Anderson said about add-ons will all have to be included in the contract for any sale from Norwich and paid to us as they materializeSimilar to my last question, do we become eligible for a % of the add on as and when they become payable? Eg £3 million for getting into the Champs league, do we get another 15/25% of that? My guess is if the whole package is worth 22m+15m in add ons then we get the same percentage of both?
I understand that, but that is not exactly what I am asking. I understand that if we have a clause that says "500k on premier league debut, and 500k on england debut etc" then those clauses would have to be included in the ongoing transfer. What if Norwich negotiated their own clauses like £2.5m when he makes his England debut". Given that we already get money when that happens, do we get another 15/25% on the additional amount on top that they have negotiated?Whatever Chris Anderson said about add-ons will all have to be included in the contract for any sale from Norwich and paid to us as they materialize
Without actually seeing the contract I can't answer thatI understand that, but that is not exactly what I am asking. I understand that if we have a clause that says "500k on premier league debut, and 500k on england debut etc" then those clauses would have to be included in the ongoing transfer. What if Norwich negotiated their own clauses like £2.5m when he makes his England debut". Given that we already get money when that happens, do we get another 15/25% on the additional amount on top that they have negotiated?
It seems logical that we would otherwise Norwich would just sell him for a negligible amount plus clauses like "25m when he makes his Premier League Debut" and if we were not entitled to the percentage of the addon then we (and every selling club) would end up screwed.
So I guess I may have answered my own question here...
Unless someone from the club discloses it we only have what Chris Anderson said at the time to go onMore the merrier keep knocking that price up a few quid!
Anyone got a definitive answer what the sell on clause is?
Unless someone from the club discloses it we only have what Chris Anderson said at the time to go on
It's likely the club used an agent and a lawyer to draw up the contract so I'll be surprised if the club doesn't do very well out of Madders' resale
Now that would be a great move for him.
More the merrier keep knocking that price up a few quid!
Anyone got a definitive answer what the sell on clause is?
Bump.
Them too?I've just heard Fulham are interested.
Tomato sauce isn't what it used to be.Your sources delivery truck has arrived several hours too late.
And salad cream is now sandwich cream.Tomato sauce isn't what it used to be.
Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk
I reckon Fulham could be interestedTomato sauce isn't what it used to be.
Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk
No chance.I reckon Fulham could be interested
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?