Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Maatsen (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter cc84cov
  • Start date Feb 12, 2022
Forums New posts

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #1
Is a better AM than O’Hare...

pass it on
 
Reactions: RegTheDonk and skyblu3sk

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #2
I thought he was awful today.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: OtiumForTheMasses and SBAndy

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #3
Thought o hare looked good today actually.
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #4
cc84cov said:
Is a better AM than O’Hare...

pass it on
Click to expand...

Lol
 
Reactions: clint van damme

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #5
stupot07 said:
I thought he was awful today.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Agree and at best he's been bang average season.
 

SleepyGinger

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #6
cc84cov said:
Is a better AM than O’Hare...

pass it on
Click to expand...
Thought he was poor today, doesn’t know how to play the position.
 
S

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #7
Jesus christ, nothing to see here. Move on.
 
S

SheafIsGod

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #8
You could replace Maatsen with literally any player in our squad for that sentence.

Is Maatsen a better player than O’Hare? Debatable.

Is Maatsen a better AM than O’Hare? Most definitely. Anyone who says otherwise is deluded. O’Hare can’t shoot and has zero composure.
 
Reactions: skybluepm2, cc84cov and skyblu3sk

SkyblueTexan

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #9
Only thing I know is that we win when either Maatsen or O’Hare score, but the problem is the sample size is so small.
 
Reactions: Bertola

ExmouthNeil

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #10
cc84cov said:
Is a better AM than O’Hare...

pass it on
Click to expand...

Purple monkey dishwasher...
 
Reactions: AiS86 and Finham

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #11
cc84cov said:
Is a better AM than O’Hare...

pass it on
Click to expand...

Based on his performance 2hen he dropped into the back line perhaps your post should have been O'Hare is a better LWB than Maatsen
 

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #12
People not rating COH is absolutely ridiculous. He could and should score more, but that shortfall by no way outweighs the numerous other attributes he adds. Measuring effectiveness by goals scored is absolutely dinosaur.

Maatsen also gets way too much unfair criticism. He’s inconsistent, but he’s 19 and it’s his second season playing men’s football, it comes with the territory.
 
Reactions: covcity4life, clint van damme, pusbccfc and 9 others
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #13
He was way off the pace today, in both positions. Glad he scored though!
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #14
cc84cov said:
Is a better AM than O’Hare...

pass it on
Click to expand...
You talk out your arse

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #15
Not like you to make a knee jerk reaction!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #16
Maatsen is gone by the end of the season anyway but of course the OP makes an absurd point
 
Reactions: Sick Boy and Ccfcisparks

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #17
SheafIsGod said:
You could replace Maatsen with literally any player in our squad for that sentence.

Is Maatsen a better player than O’Hare? Debatable.

Is Maatsen a better AM than O’Hare? Most definitely. Anyone who says otherwise is deluded. O’Hare can’t shoot and has zero composure.
Click to expand...

If it’s only debateable that Maatsen is a better player then I don’t think he stands a chance of getting in Chelsea’s team
 
S

SheafIsGod

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #18
SlowerThanPlatt said:
If it’s only debateable that Maatsen is a better player then I don’t think he stands a chance of getting in Chelsea’s team
Click to expand...

O’Hare does have 4 years on him and far more games under his belt. With the quality of Chelsea’s full backs though I’d be surprised if Maatsen ever got near the 1st team
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #19
Grendel said:
Maatsen is gone by the end of the season anyway but of course the OP makes an absurd point
Click to expand...
O’Hare is also gone end of season...

That’s if they can find a buyer for him of course
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #20
O'Hare was brilliant yesterday. He's really stepped up in the last 3/4 games. Joy to watch when he picks up the ball on the turn.

Created some brilliant chances.
 
Reactions: larry_david

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #21
Great_Expectations said:
People not rating COH is absolutely ridiculous. He could and should score more, but that shortfall by no way outweighs the numerous other attributes he adds. Measuring effectiveness by goals scored is absolutely dinosaur.

Maatsen also gets way too much unfair criticism. He’s inconsistent, but he’s 19 and it’s his second season playing men’s football, it comes with the territory.
Click to expand...

The other thing about O'Hare, people say he doesn't score enough, no argument, they say he doesn't create enough, not having that.

Chances on a plate for Hamer and Vik this week and both missed badly.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #22
Great_Expectations said:
People not rating COH is absolutely ridiculous. He could and should score more, but that shortfall by no way outweighs the numerous other attributes he adds. Measuring effectiveness by goals scored is absolutely dinosaur.

Maatsen also gets way too much unfair criticism. He’s inconsistent, but he’s 19 and it’s his second season playing men’s football, it comes with the territory.
Click to expand...
Nail on head on both counts
 
C

Cov kid 55

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #23
We play a really quick passing game, and press high up. O’Hare is critical for us in that style of play, and despite his lack of composure in front of goal (which he can improve), we wouldn’t be the same (good) team without him.
 

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #24
I felt like yesterday I saw a different o hare to the one we've had this season. He took men on with pace, conviction, drive. This is what he used to do and in my opinion he's stopped it this season and looks to get rid of the ball as soon as anyone gets near him. Yesterday he beat two or three with pace and then got clattered, even having that shot that flew over the bar. Don't mind that at all, I wish he'd shoot more often with that conviction and one day it will fly in.
 
Reactions: rexo87 and clint van damme

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #25
Maatsan played in a winning team in a new role and scored the winner what more do you want ffs! I hope we grab him back for another season at am
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #26
slowpoke said:
Maatsan played in a winning team in a new role and scored the winner what more do you want ffs! I hope we grab him back for another season at am
Click to expand...

His performance wasn't great yesterday and people are just commenting on what they saw.

I'd also snap Chelseas hand off to have him back next season.
 
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #27
I thought O'Hare was better yesterday. Some nice moments where he turned well and was a little more direct with his running.
With regards Maatsen, I would be delighted to have him again next year. He has done well playing an unfamiliar position and I liked the way he took on the shot early and with his weaker foot. Too many times we have seen our players give up the opportunity for an early strike in favour of trying to bring it back onto their dominant foot, leading to the chance being squandered. He is really nippy and looks like he has a great attitude to have pushed on after early rejection.
 
Reactions: clint van damme
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Feb 13, 2022
  • #28
clint van damme said:
His performance wasn't great yesterday and people are just commenting on what they saw.

I'd also snap Chelseas hand off to have him back next season.
Click to expand...
He still needs to develop parts of his game but very likely to play at a higher level than anyone else in our squad in my view
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?