Really? Watch it back. He did well to hold it, with a forward waiting for a spill. Any Sunday league keeper saving that would have been at the bar going on about that for the next few weeks.
You thought we’d finish top 6? And Burge has let us down and is the reason we are performing so poorly
Crikey I didn't realise you are that old. :emoji_older_man:
The guy looked to kick him as he landed from the header. Didn't see it as a stampHas anyone rewatched the Kelly Elbow apparently there is also a stamp the ref missed.
I was clearly on about the one he let in as that was what was talked about in the post I quoted.
What a point to take!
Bad day at the office for Luton thankfully.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Harsh on us.
They started very well. Then we neutralised them. Credit where credit is do. Robins clearly did his homework.
Burge... Should have saved the goal, and a couple of times looked clueless from corners. But then some good saves at the end. Need to see if we can improve on him in the summer.
Has anyone rewatched the Kelly Elbow apparently there is also a stamp the ref missed.
I don’t think I’ve been harsh on us. If Luton were the usual clinical selves then they’d of been convincing winers.
The back 4 were mostly ok over the game collectively, but the midfield as a unit were largely passengers in the game baring Kelly who’s coming away with any recognition today.
Bayliss (for the second week) and Thomas were largely ineffective this week while Hiwula was isolated for the second half. Enobakhare’s decision making to often let himself down
Felt a pairing of Meyler and Kelly would of been a better unit to start the game with a introduction of Bayliss later on could of been more rewarding.
Still we taken a point, and 4 unbeaten. We’d of snatched that this morning so we move on content.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
They put a couple just wide too earlier one, one should have done better.Luton didn't really have that many chances? The last 5 mins yes. But it wouldn't say that's not clinical. They usually create a lot more and a lot more gilt edge chances. Which we didn't let them. Hence I said harsh. We made them look worse than usual.
I do agree about bayliss. Although i have said it all season that I think he has been largely poor. He does however seem to be on of the few that can flip a game on its head...
Yeah they did have a couple of drives from deep early on (was worried it would happen all game), but thought we took that space away from them as the game went on.They put a couple just wide too earlier one, one should have done better.
Not complaining with the point though!
Thats the problem we dont have finacial difficulties we just have C&^%S as owners causing all this greifWell, you worked hard for that point, nit sure why you give Burge such stick,, thought he was pretty reasonable, the defense were on holiday for our goal. Both of us should have had a penalty and yes are team our quite physical and do wrestle in with the best of them. Shame we took our foot of the pedal and relaxed in the sun when we scored, you took advantage and we could never get it back again. Not the Hatters best day, we had more than enough of the ball but a spark was badly missing in the middle - doesn't work for us playing Hylton and Collins together. Hope you pull out of your financial difficulties, good to chat
Luton didn't really have that many chances? The last 5 mins yes. But it wouldn't say that's not clinical. They usually create a lot more and a lot more gilt edge chances. Which we didn't let them. Hence I said harsh. We made them look worse than usual.
I do agree about bayliss. Although i have said it all season that I think he has been largely poor. He does however seem to be on of the few that can flip a game on its head...
Watching that highlights video, Luton had about a dozen chances to our 1 !Highlights:
With Bayliss he can take multiple opposition players completely out of the game with his driving runs. He would have been far more effective if that prick Enobakhare had released the ball to him on more than one occasion. He also needs some better movement ahead of him at times, often it's only Thomas looking to run in behind. Needs more of that.
Does he deserve to be called a prick? You do know he plays for your team?With Bayliss he can take multiple opposition players completely out of the game with his driving runs. He would have been far more effective if that prick Enobakhare had released the ball to him on more than one occasion. He also needs some better movement ahead of him at times, often it's only Thomas looking to run in behind. Needs more of that.
Probably not, I see him playing mostly for himself mind youDoes he deserve to be called a prick? You do know he plays for your team?
Personally I’d play Bayliss in the forward role instead of bright and put meyler in the middle with Kelly. Bayliss is just as creative and has more to his game.
You’re not supposed to say anything until full time.Off point but good result so far for Shrews v Donny (if we're clinging to half a sniff of 6th place).
Ok. GoYou’re not supposed to say anything until full time.
you clearly have it in for him.Probably not, I see him playing mostly for himself mind you
Predictableyou clearly have it in for him.
Maybe because he doesn't 'stay in his lane'
#Medievilviewsreturn
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?