ccfc92
Well-Known Member
I mean they've signed someone for £1 million
And what "can't you see"?
Last edited:
I mean they've signed someone for £1 million
And what "can't you see"?
This is like talking to a two year old
This is like talking to a two year old
Ah I see what you said now. You quoted knowledge of the budget in the championship .
which was a lot less than your £30 million quoted League One budget
Apology accepted
This is like talking to a two year old
Nope I see nothing to suggest it isn't for the reasons I give. Why did you conclude it was £20 million last year? What is your rationale?
With your ability to keep going and going in an argument, you should think about releasing some kind of energy bar. Anyone for a piece of Grendal Mint Cake?
Not really.
You are saying that because they have however much money, they'll walk the league, to quote yourself.
It'd make a poor sales promotion:
Keep going, and going, until you encounter a challenge, then give up and use petty replies, and slink away to another argument.
Then repeat.
I see nothing to suggest their budget is your quoted £30 million this season.
I see nothing to suggest their budget is your quoted £30 million this season.
Encountering a challenge from you is like you playing the role of Adam Barton and me Graham Souness in his prime. Please don't flatter yourself.
We need a mobile central midfielder. We don't need any more wingers unless they play JOB in the centre.
Outright winners?
By how many points?
Outright winners?
By how many points?
Tbf the last team to come down with parachute payments walked the league.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors![]()
And if they don't? Will you eat your hat? Or naked over the Ricoh pitch? Or admit football is more fickle and unpredictable? Of course if they do win by 8-10 points we will expect you to boast about your predictive skills
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And if they don't? Will you eat your hat? Or naked over the Ricoh pitch? Or admit football is more fickle and unpredictable? Of course if they do win by 8-10 points we will expect you to boast about your predictive skills
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also, 8-10 points is hardly walking the league. Bristol city won by 8 points. Wolves by 9.
If Wigan have the war chest Grendel is talking about, they should surely clear more than 8-10 points? Going by his money = automatic success theory?
they aren't even favourites.
Oh dear. Wolves also had the same advantage. The statistical analysis suggests financial superiority of that magnitude means that sort of points gap. I can't think of many teams that have won leagues by more than that. Have there been any? Fulham in the championship with Al Fayed? Anymore?
That's that then.
This is boring. So if Wigan win the league (which they will) will ccfc92 and ccfcway pay a charity of my choice a sum of money? If they don't I will pay their chosen charity the same sum.
Put your money where your mouth is guys.
Who's saying they won't win the league?
Didn't you do this a few months ago? With another poster? Then you started changing the conditions?
You are questioning they have the biggest budget not me.
No conditions. They win the league you pay they don't I pay. How much?
I never said they didn't have the biggest budget. I was questioning your calculations/sources.
I never said they wouldn't win the league. I simply said money doesn't equal automatic success.
Slither slither backtrack backtrack.