Loan back next year - only thing that makes any sense? (1 Viewer)

[Specs WT-R75]

Sorry for another thread...

Why would the club publicly turn down Spurs and then take a last minute deal from Norwich for reportedly less than being offered by Spurs? There's only 2 possibilities.

1. We have been offered a lot more money than Spurs ... or
2. Norwich offered us something else that no other club could

Spurs offer us 5m+, we say lets talk at the end of the season and include a loan-back deal.

So, what if Norwich to steal a prospect from under the nose of some big PL clubs offered us a guaranteed season-long loan back next year to jump the gun, regardless which league we are in. Surely the guarantee of him being with us next year would be worth pushing through a last minute deal?

Would still be good business for Norwich as they get a highly rated player from under the noses of a club they wouldn't have otherwise been able to compete with in a head to head situation.

Couple that with a nice sell-on clause and is that the only situation that is win-win for the club and also keeps TM happy....

 

---

[pusbccfc]

It's the sell-on clause which would have swayed it.
As I said on an other thread, a massive sell on percentage for a player like him may have swayed it.

 

[Specs WT-R75]

It's the sell-on clause which would have swayed it.
As I said on an other thread, a massive sell on percentage for a player like him may have swayed it.

Why couldn't it be both? Massive sell on fee doesn't keep Mowbray happy or make sense if the initial fee is as low as has been suggested...

 

[covcity4life]

maybe if they stay ion prem and we get promoted we get a season long loan in championship

 

[sky blue zam]

We should have asked for Lafferty as part of the deal