shmmeee
Well-Known Member
No he's not. He's ignoring him because he's failed to make valid points or answer reasonable questions and basically acts like an offensive nutter with delusions of grandeur.
But that's exactly what you are doing. You don't believe he is right so you have no time for him or his comments.
No he's not. He's ignoring him because he's failed to make valid points or answer reasonable questions and basically acts like an offensive nutter with delusions of grandeur.
But that's exactly what you are doing. You don't believe he is right so you have no time for him or his comments.
And there aren't any offensive - and anonymous - nutters on here?
And there aren't any offensive - and anonymous - nutters on here?
"A few angry obsessives". Spot on, I would say.
Indeed, well done to the OP in posting about it to demonstrate the point.
As he's on Twitter constantly retweeting praise in that odd way people do so they can promote themselves to people who are already following them anyway, he's obviously a bit of a self-publicist. He is right that people have begun to obsess over him though. Normally if someone loses credibility they're best ignored rather than hailed as the great enemy.
Thank you so much for realising the point. Perhaps you could make my day even better by "liking" my post?
No he's not. He's ignoring him because he's failed to make valid points or answer reasonable questions and basically acts like an offensive nutter with delusions of grandeur.
As he's on Twitter constantly retweeting praise in that odd way people do so they can promote themselves to people who are already following them anyway,
But that's exactly what you are doing. You don't believe he is right so you have no time for him or his comments.
its on like donkeykong
https://mobile.twitter.com/Lesreidpolitics/status/395937259800625153
but at least hes not taking credit for it
https://mobile.twitter.com/Lesreidpolitics/status/395942445059276801
Les Reid is at it again on twitter ......... this time it is with Supporter's Direct!
Blowing his own trumpet and getting a bit personal again, and made a reference to people on hereI'm glad we are noticed! At th
Les Reid @Lesreidpolitics
@Jack_Griffin I'll let u into a secret Jack. A few angry obsessives on @SkyBluesTalk have no credibility.Now see if u can resist tweeting me
What set him off?
Jack Griffin @Jack_Griffin 20h
@Lesreidpolitics Invitation? Its another PR statement that backfired. It really got peoples backs up on http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk
Have you been blocked like me Jack?...The "Bear"...remember him? was going to speak to Reid, to ask him to reply to my tweets .....Got blocked instead. lmfao.
I could almost gip at this one:
'well done Les your reporting and pressure has brought this about, thankyou!'
And he retweets it! Have you no dignity or sense of decorum, man? How embarrassing. If it's a compliment, take it as a compliment. Re-tweeting it is so cringe-worthy I can't think of an act as similarly self-glorifying; expect maybe having lots of certificates up on your office wall. I can barely type this as I can't stop shaking my head in involuntarily dismay
@LES: @israel can you just sort it out with @palestine?
@LES: @palestine let me get you round the table with @israel yeah?
@LES: I'VE solved the conflict everyone, talks tomorrow!
RT @les u am de best!
RT @les now sort serbia and montenegro lol. but seriously you're a king
RT @les additional generic crawling compliment les!
@LES: @pisraelstine is official thanks to ME. #gazastrippersatthepartylol
Generally speaking I like Les Reid and most of what he writes. But it feels like he's starting to take things a bit personally, and worse, make things a bit personal.
'A few angry obsessives' is a rather unnecessary insult. If he thinks everyone here holds the same opinion then he really needs to read a bit more!
I don't know whether this forum reflects popular opinion or not, and I don't think it's ever wise to claim that you speak for the majority unless you've troubled yourself to put your beliefs to the vote.
This claim that the 'majority of taxpayers and fans want CCFC back at the Ricoh' is completely without nuance or evidence. I do want CCFC back at the Ricoh, but not if it costs the taxpayer. It seems there's another bunch of people who don't care if it costs the taxpayer, and there's a third set that want CCFC back, but not with SISU owning the stadium regardless of what they might offer. There are even some that want to stay at Northampton, bless 'em.
I don't know what the proportions are between those groups, but it saddens me that an otherwise pretty decent journalist now seems to be offering his personal opinion under the mantle of speaking for the majority.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?