When Tim Fisher says SISU batter you in court, what he actually means is ,they batter your Bank Account.I've read somewhere that Wasps have invested something like £400,000 just having lawyers keeping up to date on the proceedings in the current court case. Despite sisu not winning the first case i dont think any expences have ever been paid.I may be wrong some one will probably put me right .Just as a side if the team had a wln % Sisu have in court we wouldn't need to be relegated to non league form would take us there.
No costs been paid yetI've read somewhere that Wasps have invested something like £400,000 just having lawyers keeping up to date on the proceedings in the current court case. Despite sisu not winning the first case i dont think any expences have ever been paid.I may be wrong some one will probably put me right .Just as a side if the team had a wln % Sisu have in court we wouldn't need to be relegated to non league form would take us there.
Isn't the first judicial review finished not knowing a thing about how courts run(not wanting to) but shouldn 't Susi have payed costs or have none been awarded.If not why not ?No costs been paid yet
Can someone sensible point out to me what is wrong with SISU appealing?
Or for that matter what is wrong with SISU taking out any of the legal actions?
Without the sarcastic bollox or a smart arsed answer-just a really good reason why all the SISU court stuff is wrong and why.
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
nothing at all. There is nothing legally wrong with any of the court cases, as its their right to do it, that's the beauty of the justice system.
That’s what I thought and can’t really understand why so much antipathy directed at SISU for carrying it on.
Ultimately surely if SISU wins legals CCFC win too?
From Sisu’s prospective they will look at the legal costs as a legitimate cost for the business which will reduce their tax liability. Therefore they are quite happy to keep throwing money at it as in reality the exchequer is paying a proportion of the costs every time they lose.How much in legal costs are being racked up? At some point surely they will need to be paid alongside any fines deemed fit in the legal process. Could that ultimately destroy sisu or council? Or am I being naive and both sides will weather any losses comfortably?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They were awarded against them, they’ve not been paidIsn't the first judicial review finished not knowing a thing about how courts run(not wanting to) but shouldn 't Susi have payed costs or have none been awarded.If not why not ?
They have a legal right but there are consequences. I also think that a Sisu win doesn’t necessarily benefit ccfc in any wayThat’s what I thought and can’t really understand why so much antipathy directed at SISU for carrying it on.
Ultimately surely if SISU wins legals CCFC win too?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
How do you know?They were awarded against them, they’ve not been paid
Sorry should have clarified that I am pretty sure not certain.How do you know?
As I understand it, costs will be awarded but they will not cover the actual cost of the defence only the court time and there is a significant delay between award and payment, they will certainly not be settled while appeals are ongoing.Isn't the first judicial review finished not knowing a thing about how courts run(not wanting to) but shouldn 't Susi have payed costs or have none been awarded.If not why not ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?