Legals (1 Viewer)

[higgs]

With our owners going ahead with the legals if they lose this time is that their final chance will it be dead in the water if they lose again?

Would wasps ever do a deal with us if we go ahead with the legals and lose?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

---

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

Think there’s another appeal to the Supreme Court and European court.

They’ll probably go civil route if they lose this one

 

[stevefloyd]

Might as well keep going until they win one...the poxy government have

 

[ccfcway]

Civil action hasn’t even begun yet. They won’t start that until this process has been exhausted.

It’s far from over

 

[OffenhamSkyBlue]

The current appeal is in the Supreme Court ain’t it? Hopefully we’ll be out from under ECJ jurisdiction before they can take it there.
But yeah civil cases can last years!

 

[Ashdown]

And people think the Sharks might build a stadium.......laughable ! We've been kidnapped and that's that for possibly years.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

It’s why I can’t understand the amost support for our litigious owners

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

There’s no support for them. We want them gone, what we’d don’t want is to be under the behest of Wasps - something Hoffman would have us doing.

It’s probably more wanting SISU to win out of spite - given that the council sold our stadium just to spite them and not giving a fuck about their own football team

 

[lifeskyblue]

How much in legal costs are being racked up? At some point surely they will need to be paid alongside any fines deemed fit in the legal process. Could that ultimately destroy sisu or council? Or am I being naive and both sides will weather any losses comfortably?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[thekidfromstrettoncamp]

I've read somewhere that Wasps have invested something like £400,000 just having lawyers keeping up to date on the proceedings in the current court case. Despite sisu not winning the first case i dont think any expences have ever been paid.I may be wrong some one will probably put me right .Just as a side if the team had a wln % Sisu have in court we wouldn't need to be relegated to non league form would take us there.

 

[COVKIDSNEVERQUIT]

I've read somewhere that Wasps have invested something like £400,000 just having lawyers keeping up to date on the proceedings in the current court case. Despite sisu not winning the first case i dont think any expences have ever been paid.I may be wrong some one will probably put me right .Just as a side if the team had a wln % Sisu have in court we wouldn't need to be relegated to non league form would take us there.

When Tim Fisher says SISU batter you in court, what he actually means is ,they batter your Bank Account.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

I've read somewhere that Wasps have invested something like £400,000 just having lawyers keeping up to date on the proceedings in the current court case. Despite sisu not winning the first case i dont think any expences have ever been paid.I may be wrong some one will probably put me right .Just as a side if the team had a wln % Sisu have in court we wouldn't need to be relegated to non league form would take us there.

No costs been paid yet

 

[thekidfromstrettoncamp]

No costs been paid yet

Isn't the first judicial review finished not knowing a thing about how courts run(not wanting to) but shouldn 't Susi have payed costs or have none been awarded.If not why not ?

 

[Fergusons_Beard]

Can someone sensible point out to me what is wrong with SISU appealing?

Or for that matter what is wrong with SISU taking out any of the legal actions?

Without the sarcastic bollox or a smart arsed answer-just a really good reason why all the SISU court stuff is wrong and why.

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[ccfcway]

Can someone sensible point out to me what is wrong with SISU appealing?

Or for that matter what is wrong with SISU taking out any of the legal actions?

Without the sarcastic bollox or a smart arsed answer-just a really good reason why all the SISU court stuff is wrong and why.

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

nothing at all. There is nothing legally wrong with any of the court cases, as its their right to do it, that's the beauty of the justice system.

On the reverse, there is nothing legally wrong with wasps not wanting to talk to ccfc due to legals or because they don't like the colour of our shirts, its their ground to decide who they lend it to.

 

[Fergusons_Beard]

nothing at all. There is nothing legally wrong with any of the court cases, as its their right to do it, that's the beauty of the justice system.

That’s what I thought and can’t really understand why so much antipathy directed at SISU for carrying it on.

Ultimately surely if SISU wins legals CCFC win too?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[ccfcway]

That’s what I thought and can’t really understand why so much antipathy directed at SISU for carrying it on.

Ultimately surely if SISU wins legals CCFC win too?

and if they lose (again) ?

and if they win, what's to suggest CCFC benefit ?.

Didn't CCFC release a statement today which said...

Coventry City Football Club and its management team cannot affect the stances of our Owners

 

[SAJ]

How much in legal costs are being racked up? At some point surely they will need to be paid alongside any fines deemed fit in the legal process. Could that ultimately destroy sisu or council? Or am I being naive and both sides will weather any losses comfortably?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

From Sisu’s prospective they will look at the legal costs as a legitimate cost for the business which will reduce their tax liability. Therefore they are quite happy to keep throwing money at it as in reality the exchequer is paying a proportion of the costs every time they lose.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Isn't the first judicial review finished not knowing a thing about how courts run(not wanting to) but shouldn 't Susi have payed costs or have none been awarded.If not why not ?

They were awarded against them, they’ve not been paid

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

That’s what I thought and can’t really understand why so much antipathy directed at SISU for carrying it on.

Ultimately surely if SISU wins legals CCFC win too?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

They have a legal right but there are consequences. I also think that a Sisu win doesn’t necessarily benefit ccfc in any way

 

[fernandopartridge]

They were awarded against them, they’ve not been paid

How do you know?

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

How do you know?

Sorry should have clarified that I am pretty sure not certain.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

In fact talking out my arse the first case costs were paid. The one in 2017 not sure

Will CCFC have to fork out for Sisu's latest court defeat?

 

[Captain Dart]

Isn't the first judicial review finished not knowing a thing about how courts run(not wanting to) but shouldn 't Susi have payed costs or have none been awarded.If not why not ?

As I understand it, costs will be awarded but they will not cover the actual cost of the defence only the court time and there is a significant delay between award and payment, they will certainly not be settled while appeals are ongoing.

 

[Irish Sky Blue]

It would seem to me that they are using the legal system to distress first ACL and now Wasps. As others have said, this is battering people with court rather than in court. The fairness of their case seems to be secondary (if it is there at all) to their intention to keep their opponents tied up in legal action. That would seem to be an abuse of the legal system.
I couldn't care less wh they pursue in the courts to be honest. However, the sad fact is that our football club suffers because of what they do.