fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
The left and right is mixed up
Think to be fair this would be a good option for us. Think we could have the 5-3-2 as a back up formation when at tough games away and a 3-4-3 formation as our main. View attachment 38614
Terrible with my right and left. Can we pretend it’s rightThe left and right is mixed up
Playing as we are I can’t see us causing any problems. Just want a much better performance.(Famous last words) I don't think Leeds are at the same level they were last season. They've had a good start but they've beaten (and I know we are currently) mostly teams in or likely to finish in the bottom third of the table. They have lost twice at home to sides you'd expect to finish in the top half (Boro and Burnley) and drew at West Brom.
The left and right is mixed up
Playing as we are I can’t see us causing any problems. Just want a much better performance.
In the games against Norwich, Swansea, Stoke & Bristol City , I can't remember us creating many chances.We do cause problems though? We are just not putting chances away.
In the games against Norwich, Swansea, Stoke & Bristol City , I can't remember us creating many chances.
Dyslexia?Think to be fair this would be a good option for us. Think we could have the 5-3-2 as a back up formation when at tough games away and a 3-4-3 formation as our main. View attachment 38614
DyspraxiaDyslexia?
Which is all well and good but the reality is that will quickly become 5-4-1 for most of the game.As a few others have said, I honestly wouldn't be averse to going back to the wingbacks.
I think with Torp and Rudoni the complete lack of forward creativity we had the last time we tried wingbacks might not be as bad.
And the main thing is we need to stop conceding these stupid goals and we haven't looked comfortable in a back 4 all season. Even last season we didn't look great defensively.
Binks, JDS and even MVE were brought in to play in a back 3 with wingbacks. As someone mentioned above, we could even try 3-4-3 so we've got the same forward line.
Now if we line up in a back 3 and it looks every bit as disjointed and shit as it did the start of last season I'll eat my words.
Depends on the match, you could go 3-5-2 or 3-4-3. Even 5-4-1What problem is 3 at the back solving? We were leaking goals early last season using it and lost 4 games on the spin before it was ditched.
I'm not sure where people like Sakamoto or EMC would fit. Would we play two up top or one?
What problem is 3 at the back solving? We were leaking goals early last season using it and lost 4 games on the spin before it was ditched.
I'm not sure where people like Sakamoto or EMC would fit. Would we play two up top or one?
Be brave and shake things up if we're losing anyway I say!Well definately concede. We need to score 3 in every game to stand any chance of winning. It is typical of city to go here Saturday and win after that dross against Swansea but I’m still thinking a comfortable home win I’m afraid.
Removing the reliance on an out and out DM and letting us get Dasilva and MvE further up the pitch.
It depends really.It doesn't reduce reliance on it at all?
It doesn't reduce reliance on it at all?
ShhhhhhWILSON
MVE THOMAS BINKS KITCHEN JDS
ECCLES RUDONI
SAKA SIMMS WRIGHT
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?