Lats and Wolf (8 Viewers)

Cov98

Well-Known Member
Lati and Wolf at the back, KKH if he's fit instead of Milan and Eccles a bit deeper instead of Grimes.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I see some desperation is kicking in.
 

Sky_Blue_Daz

Well-Known Member
Grimes has been off it for at least 5 weeks , I think he’s a great player but he needs a rest .
 

marrrkjay_ccfc

Well-Known Member
Latibeaudiere was better in his two games vs Leicester and Millwall than Thomas or Kitching have been in months. His passing may be a bit suspect but at least he’s not making glaring errors every game.
I agree and I never thought I would say this but Latibeaudiere has to come back into the side for Kitching. May as well give Woolfenden a go a head of Thomas.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Should start vs Oxford.

They cant be any worse!

Thomas and Kitching are a car crash.

Grimes in front is offerring no cover..and going forward is lost.
Not sure why he signed wolf tbh , odd signing to say the least .. he even struggled with KKH when he was fit and he signed them both
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
I would be surprised if Kitch and Thomas start the next game.

One of them will be dropped (or 'rested') and you have to imagine it will be Kitching.
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
Okay here’s my crazy post and then I’m off.

Why not try Kitching as the leftback. Idea being he could tuck in with possession to form a back three.

Thomas - Woolfenden- Kitching.

This would mean defensively we would be less than vulnerable to counters as we are currently as our back four becomes a back two.

Furthermore it would force Grimes higher up the pitch and allow space for Rudoni to drift wide the left channel to under/overlap with EMC

In essence changing the 3-1-6 to a 3-2-5?

IMG_8537.jpeg
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Okay here’s my crazy post and then I’m off.

Why not try Kitching as the leftback. Idea being he could tuck in with possession to form a back three.

Thomas - Woolfenden- Kitching.

This would mean defensively we would be less than vulnerable to counters as we are currently as our back four becomes a back two.

Furthermore it would force Grimes higher up the pitch and allow space for Rudoni to drift wide the left channel to under/overlap with EMC

In essence changing the 3-1-6 to a 3-2-5?

View attachment 48888
hahahahahhahahahaha
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
Okay here’s my crazy post and then I’m off.

Why not try Kitching as the leftback. Idea being he could tuck in with possession to form a back three.

Thomas - Woolfenden- Kitching.

This would mean defensively we would be less than vulnerable to counters as we are currently as our back four becomes a back two.

Furthermore it would force Grimes higher up the pitch and allow space for Rudoni to drift wide the left channel to under/overlap with EMC

In essence changing the 3-1-6 to a 3-2-5?

View attachment 48888
Some may laugh..but i wont. As this cant be worse from what we are witnessing right now...but we just signed 10 wingers!

3 at the back in formation away feom home not a bad idea.
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
Not sure why he signed wolf tbh , odd signing to say the least .. he even struggled with KKH when he was fit and he signed them both

Classic panic signing when Hughes wouldn't come.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top