I really cant find too much fault Milan apart from hes covering and is knackered.Lati and Wolf at the back, KKH if he's fit instead of Milan and Eccles a bit deeper instead of Grimes.
Yeah giving him a rest was my thought with this one. Been a few occasions where he's looked a bit leggy.I really cant find too much fault Milan apart from hes covering and is knackered.
I agree and I never thought I would say this but Latibeaudiere has to come back into the side for Kitching. May as well give Woolfenden a go a head of Thomas.Latibeaudiere was better in his two games vs Leicester and Millwall than Thomas or Kitching have been in months. His passing may be a bit suspect but at least he’s not making glaring errors every game.
I never thought id be saying this either..i started a thread!I agree and I never thought I would say this but Latibeaudiere has to come back into the side for Kitching. May as well give Woolfenden a go a head of Thomas.
Not sure why he signed wolf tbh , odd signing to say the least .. he even struggled with KKH when he was fit and he signed them bothShould start vs Oxford.
They cant be any worse!
Thomas and Kitching are a car crash.
Grimes in front is offerring no cover..and going forward is lost.
And yet he hasn't scored in something like 17 league games.Kone was a beast...owned Kitching and Thomas.
What centre forward.
But for Rushworth this would have been 3 goals conceded.
Woolfendon would like a chanceThe system we play, whoever plays at CB has no chance
Yep, I'd start Bidwell as well.Should start vs Oxford.
They cant be any worse!
Thomas and Kitching are a car crash.
Grimes in front is offerring no cover..and going forward is lost.
hahahahahhahahahahaOkay here’s my crazy post and then I’m off.
Why not try Kitching as the leftback. Idea being he could tuck in with possession to form a back three.
Thomas - Woolfenden- Kitching.
This would mean defensively we would be less than vulnerable to counters as we are currently as our back four becomes a back two.
Furthermore it would force Grimes higher up the pitch and allow space for Rudoni to drift wide the left channel to under/overlap with EMC
In essence changing the 3-1-6 to a 3-2-5?
View attachment 48888
I did say it was crazyhahahahahhahahahaha
Some may laugh..but i wont. As this cant be worse from what we are witnessing right now...but we just signed 10 wingers!Okay here’s my crazy post and then I’m off.
Why not try Kitching as the leftback. Idea being he could tuck in with possession to form a back three.
Thomas - Woolfenden- Kitching.
This would mean defensively we would be less than vulnerable to counters as we are currently as our back four becomes a back two.
Furthermore it would force Grimes higher up the pitch and allow space for Rudoni to drift wide the left channel to under/overlap with EMC
In essence changing the 3-1-6 to a 3-2-5?
View attachment 48888
Not sure why he signed wolf tbh , odd signing to say the least .. he even struggled with KKH when he was fit and he signed them both
Panic buy because we never got HughesGod knows why we've spent all that money on Wolf to never player him when we can't stop letting the opposition walk straight through our defence.
This isn't on Wolf..He needs to start, next to Lati and bring Bidwell in, as well for Oxford game.Panic buy because we never got Hughes
Okay here’s my crazy post and then I’m off.
Why not try Kitching as the leftback. Idea being he could tuck in with possession to form a back three.
Thomas - Woolfenden- Kitching.
This would mean defensively we would be less than vulnerable to counters as we are currently as our back four becomes a back two.
Furthermore it would force Grimes higher up the pitch and allow space for Rudoni to drift wide the left channel to under/overlap with EMC
In essence changing the 3-1-6 to a 3-2-5?
View attachment 48888
God knows why we've spent all that money on Wolf to never player him when we can't stop letting the opposition walk straight through our defence.
Panic buy because we never got Hughes
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?