CCFCAnalysis
Well-Known Member
DK has done fantastically well so far
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How many did we get to before King ?His own brief let’s note.
if we get 3 playoff finals of 5 but don’t get promoted he’s achieved nothing
What has impressed you with King in his tenure ? You seem incapable of offering any positive comment without following it with agenda driven nonsense.boddy wasn’t the money guy however he was the one who initiated the connection of the club with the fans
he done many things which started our relationship back with the club and team
boddy might have had his flaws but he is one of the reasons why king could invest in the club
robins generated millions for this club along with adi with his coaching and getting us from L2 to the championship
if that wasn’t in place, king wouldn’t be in the position to improve the facilities etc.
like it or not, robins, adi and boddy are the reason the club where it is now
Broadly speaking I agree with you and the Robins regime should be lauded for their part in the bringing us from the storm to much calmer waters.boddy wasn’t the money guy however he was the one who initiated the connection of the club with the fans
he done many things which started our relationship back with the club and team
boddy might have had his flaws but he is one of the reasons why king could invest in the club
robins generated millions for this club along with adi with his coaching and getting us from L2 to the championship
if that wasn’t in place, king wouldn’t be in the position to improve the facilities etc.
like it or not, robins, adi and boddy are the reason the club where it is now
we weren’t a failing club when he came in. we were an established championship team with years of success and progression
robins and adi coached players and turned the team into a playoff final team. that wasn’t down to king
he has improved the club off the pitch but only looks good because we were neglected before
we are now in a position where king has to take us to that next level. that’s where he will be judged imo
everyone would take where we are but to say that’s down to king is ludicrous
we are where we are because of Robins and boddy
they are the guys who got us through the doldrums
king inherited the groundworks nothing more or less
Isn’t this the education thing we were involved/linked with?
Its also fair to say the club was already doing the best it has done in the years leading up to his takeover. Was already on a upward trajectory under Mark Robins.You really can't think of anyone else who's done more to move the club forward in the last 12 years?
Good point, could well beIsn’t this the education thing we were involved/linked with?
The 3rd paragraph is massively understated. Off the pitch we were a shambles and there’s only so many times robins would have been able to paper over the cracks.we weren’t a failing club when he came in. we were an established championship team with years of success and progression
robins and adi coached players and turned the team into a playoff final team. that wasn’t down to king
he has improved the club off the pitch but only looks good because we were neglected before
we are now in a position where king has to take us to that next level. that’s where he will be judged imo
Nobody isn't giving Boddy and Robins the credit they deserve. They played a massive part in bringing the club back. As did certain players like Doyle, Kelly, McFadzean and Godden.
But things can't stand still. Under King the progress has continued. He hasn't got everything right, nobody does. There are still lots of challenges. But that is the nature of business and football, the landscape doesn't stand still.
There will come a time when King will have run his course, just like all the other previous owners. But so far he has done well. A lot of that is because he has strengthened the team that is Coventry City FC on and off the pitch. He knows he needs the right people in the right positions for the club to be a success (and I'm not refering to players positions).
The 3rd paragraph is massively understated. Off the pitch we were a shambles and there’s only so many times robins would have been able to paper over the cracks.
there was no money left. Had king not come in - there’s a chance we’d not have made the play offs and the season after could have been a car crash, especially given we hadn’t got a 5 year deal at the CBS.
king has stabilised us as a top 10 championship side.
Very well addressed that.As a committed Coventry city fan why do you find it almost impossible to give King any credit ?
He didn’t get lucky, Hamer and Vik were assets of a business he bought after undertaking due diligence.
He then could have sold one or both in the January to instantly realise value for himself but he didn’t he in fact added to the squad in the January.
We missed out on promotion and the sale of Vik and Hamer was inevitable as both players wanted to leave. Again he got top dollar for them and again didn’t pocket the money but reinvested most of it in the playing squad in a way that would help create a sustainable approach to improving the squad for years to come.
The training facilities are at last worthy of being a championship team, our back room approach is modern, and our commercial activities have never been better ( even though they could still be improved further in my view )
He has made errors with ticket pricing in my view but we have 24,000 season ticket holders so I even I have to concede that in the short term it’s not damaging us.
if you speak to people in the business and agent side of the game they have nothing but positive things to say about Kings impact on the club and yet you a committed fan find it impossible to be anything other than unbalanced about him. Very odd.
Hope it works out well for him and he develops his man management skills. There is no doubt he is a leader.Michael Doyle
You can respect the job an owner is doing without having them as a hero.Always find fawning over an owner a bit creepy.
Heroes are on the pitch, not in the director's box. If he didn't want to put money in then he wouldn't. He's no different from any other owner, he's here to make money.
It's extremely childish.Calling him Bling is not disrespectful.
I know for a fact in the weeks running up to the initial King investment the club were telling agents that Vik and Hamer would be available in January.
If we had sold one or both I doubt we would have gone on to make the play off final.
What has impressed you with King in his tenure ? You seem incapable of offering any positive comment without following it with agenda driven nonsense.
King has done a good job in professionalising the operation and putting in some investment, he deserves a lot of credit for that. But he didn’t buy a club on its knees - we were two points of the Championship playoffs when he came in, with a squad that contained two of the league’s most valuable players. It was a favourable platform for any new owner to start from and he owes all of that to Robins.
Robin’s didn’t spot Hamer nor Gykores but he certainly helped improve them both.King has done a good job in professionalising the operation and putting in some investment, he deserves a lot of credit for that. But he didn’t buy a club on its knees - we were two points of the Championship playoffs when he came in, with a squad that contained two of the league’s most valuable players. It was a favourable platform for any new owner to start from and he owes all of that to Robins.
On the pitch we had a decent team not a squad and the infrastructure was a shambles and an embarrassment.
Surely considerable credit goes to Dean Austin too.King has done a good job in professionalising the operation and putting in some investment, he deserves a lot of credit for that. But he didn’t buy a club on its knees - we were two points of the Championship playoffs when he came in, with a squad that contained two of the league’s most valuable players. It was a favourable platform for any new owner to start from and he owes all of that to Robins.
Well, not for Hamer and Gyokeres, no.Surely considerable credit goes to Dean Austin too.
Surely considerable credit goes to Dean Austin too.