Keogh or New signings (1 Viewer)

katzenjammer

New Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #1

I was having a debate with a mate last night about what scenario would we prefer - Keogh to stay or new signings. I said new signings, he said Keogh.

Obviously in an ideal world it would be both but what would you prefer if you had to choose?

 

skybluebeduff

Well-Known Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #2

Can I choose new owners instead of the other options?

 

S

SkyBlueJohnso

New Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #3

i guess it depends on who the new signings are! with the other defenders we have, i'd swap for a decent striker and either a creative midfielder who can pass the ball about, or a tough tackling, controlling midfielder to keep things together.

so keogh for 2 decent players i'd be happy with, other than that we have to try and keep him

 

D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #4

New signings everytime, love Keogh but it is no good having the four best players in this league and a shit squad. We have had that before.

 

D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #5

Only problem is, our owners get money for Keogh would it go on New signings.

 

hill83

Well-Known Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #6

New signings without a doubt. 1 player doesn't make a team, but 4 or 5 signings could.

 

S

skyblue1523

New Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #7

Only problem is, our owners get money for keogh would it go on new siginings.

That would be a NO then,seeing the accounts we wont sign anyone more chance of going bust.

GET SISU OUT :jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit:

 

sky_blue_up_north

Well-Known Member

• Jun 27, 2012

• #8

Remember Keogh is still under contract, so does not cost us anything, so he may end up staying because we don't sign anyone.