As a customer of CCFC
How do you think the owners and board are doing this season
Rating and reasons please
Joy - 4 lots of rhetoric that we will see more if her and she is far more hands on. Yet she still has never met and spoken to the fans her main customers.
TF - 6 moved from a 4 to 6 solely due to been part of the interview process that culminated in MR running the show.
Dies face the fans but not often enough
Wag - 4 far to self inflated, his article on the amazing community work he did at Charlton was so self obsessed. Yet Charlton asked him to leave.
MR - 8 away form amazing. Comes across very well in interviews seems very straight forward. Made 5-6 loan signings. 3 of whom are excellent players. Acted quickly regarding lose of DMC. Sorts out home form and he will be a 9-10.
This thread has been invaded by the WUM army.
You missed out Clark and the Mysterious Labovitch ,just what does this bloke do.:thinking about:Think thats over generous for TF tbh.
5-6 loans 3 excellent - yet the rest were EXCEPTIONALLY POOR
That alone should not a bare minimum of 4/10 off robins mark!
Completely unconvinced by robin's turnaround myth.
So we are still in the bottom 4?
Sheffers - is woeful, Jennings (apart from being vaguely linked to Rooney is useless). Barton, Ball Fleck hopeless. Cody who carried the weight of the expectation pre-season cannot even get in the side. Elliott score 3 goals in 2 games (hardly what you would call prolific). Baker had a short decent spell, but still not conviced by him. Moussa blows hot and cold (far too incosistent).
Do you go to games? If you do go do you bother watching?
There are several occassions where you can look at glaringly obvious poor decisions by Robins. Saturday they played satisfactory 2nd half which makes the extremely poor first half even worse!
I suppose we should have done what most Prem and top european players can't do and stopped Bale from playing :facepalm:
He claimed on arrival the team had quality throughout, yet in the first week brought in 4 loans! (kind of undermined his very first comment!)
So you would have been happier for him not to strengthen the squad?
Indeed had it not been for McGoldricks run of blinding form, cov would have lost a further 5 games (which would have put coventry on 22 points (out of the relegation zone on goal difference). I just find the cult of robins worship quite frankly laughable.
So we would have played with 10 players and not had another striker on instead of him.....like Elliot that came in and scored 2 when McG was banned for one game
He hasn't even managed to improve the fitness (as shown by being unable to play 90 mins) - and that ANYONE can achieve.
So we are still losing games in the last 10 mins? Not getting wins after going behind?
Robins I'll grant has been extremely fortunate to have received the benefit of DM's form of his career. Far too many games dominated by one man to claim that the TEAM has improved.
So McG did it all by himself? He did well at MK Franchise when we won there didn't he :claping hands:
Shrewsbury beating city not just once but twice exposed the true poor current state of the team. And he has put all his eggs in 1 basket with the signing of Clarke (the guy who had a strop because he was told to have more training by DiCanio). He hasn't scored now since 20 Nov - Pretty clear his rich run of form has dried up!
Clarke played better than McG. How was he supposed to score when not playing? 11 goals in 15 games for a club that is now in the bottom 4 after he left them. This shows he as useless as yourself
MR 3 at MOST. Turned the team around? Rode on the coat-tails of DM's form more like!
<br />What an absolute knob jockey we have on this thread.
5-6 loans 3 excellent - yet the rest were EXCEPTIONALLY POOR.
Indeed one was so bad he had to get a loanee for the loanee!
That alone should not a bare minimum of 4/10 off robins mark!
Completely unconvinced by robin's turnaround myth. If he has indeed turned the team around, then surely the entire team will have improved. Certainly the defence is still extremely fragile. And what has happened to Jordan? He was fantastic for the latter part of last season, yet under Robins has if anything gone backwards. Blair adams is only "GREAT" when you compare him to the players plying for his spot.
Sheffers - is woeful, Jennings (apart from being vaguely linked to Rooney is useless). Barton, Ball Fleck hopeless. Cody who carried the weight of the expectation pre-season cannot even get in the side. Elliott score 3 goals in 2 games (hardly what you would call prolific). Baker had a short decent spell, but still not conviced by him. Moussa blows hot and cold (far too incosistent).
There are several occassions where you can look at glaringly obvious poor decisions by Robins. Saturday they played satisfactory 2nd half which makes the extremely poor first half even worse!
He claimed on arrival the team had quality throughout, yet in the first week brought in 4 loans! (kind of undermined his very first comment!)
Indeed had it not been for McGoldricks run of blinding form, cov would have lost a further 5 games (which would have put coventry on 22 points (out of the relegation zone on goal difference). I just find the cult of robins worship quite frankly laughable.
He hasn't even managed to improve the fitness (as shown by being unable to play 90 mins) - and that ANYONE can achieve.
Robins I'll grant has been extremely fortunate to have received the benefit of DM's form of his career. Far too many games dominated by one man to claim that the TEAM has improved.
Shrewsbury beating city not just once but twice exposed the true poor current state of the team. And he has put all his eggs in 1 basket with the signing of Clarke (the guy who had a strop because he was told to have more training by DiCanio). He hasn't scored now since 20 Nov - Pretty clear his rich run of form has dried up!
MR 3 at MOST. Turned the team around? Rode on the coat-tails of DM's form more like!
5-6 loans 3 excellent - yet the rest were EXCEPTIONALLY POOR.
Indeed one was so bad he had to get a loanee for the loanee!
That alone should not a bare minimum of 4/10 off robins mark!
Completely unconvinced by robin's turnaround myth. If he has indeed turned the team around, then surely the entire team will have improved. Certainly the defence is still extremely fragile. And what has happened to Jordan? He was fantastic for the latter part of last season, yet under Robins has if anything gone backwards. Blair adams is only "GREAT" when you compare him to the players plying for his spot.
Sheffers - is woeful, Jennings (apart from being vaguely linked to Rooney is useless). Barton, Ball Fleck hopeless. Cody who carried the weight of the expectation pre-season cannot even get in the side. Elliott score 3 goals in 2 games (hardly what you would call prolific). Baker had a short decent spell, but still not conviced by him. Moussa blows hot and cold (far too incosistent).
There are several occassions where you can look at glaringly obvious poor decisions by Robins. Saturday they played satisfactory 2nd half which makes the extremely poor first half even worse!
He claimed on arrival the team had quality throughout, yet in the first week brought in 4 loans! (kind of undermined his very first comment!)
Indeed had it not been for McGoldricks run of blinding form, cov would have lost a further 5 games (which would have put coventry on 22 points (out of the relegation zone on goal difference). I just find the cult of robins worship quite frankly laughable.
He hasn't even managed to improve the fitness (as shown by being unable to play 90 mins) - and that ANYONE can achieve.
Robins I'll grant has been extremely fortunate to have received the benefit of DM's form of his career. Far too many games dominated by one man to claim that the TEAM has improved.
Shrewsbury beating city not just once but twice exposed the true poor current state of the team. And he has put all his eggs in 1 basket with the signing of Clarke (the guy who had a strop because he was told to have more training by DiCanio). He hasn't scored now since 20 Nov - Pretty clear his rich run of form has dried up!
MR 3 at MOST. Turned the team around? Rode on the coat-tails of DM's form more like!
5-6 loans 3 excellent - yet the rest were EXCEPTIONALLY POOR.
Indeed one was so bad he had to get a loanee for the loanee!
That alone should not a bare minimum of 4/10 off robins mark!
Completely unconvinced by robin's turnaround myth. If he has indeed turned the team around, then surely the entire team will have improved. Certainly the defence is still extremely fragile. And what has happened to Jordan? He was fantastic for the latter part of last season, yet under Robins has if anything gone backwards. Blair adams is only "GREAT" when you compare him to the players plying for his spot.
Sheffers - is woeful, Jennings (apart from being vaguely linked to Rooney is useless). Barton, Ball Fleck hopeless. Cody who carried the weight of the expectation pre-season cannot even get in the side. Elliott score 3 goals in 2 games (hardly what you would call prolific). Baker had a short decent spell, but still not conviced by him. Moussa blows hot and cold (far too incosistent).
There are several occassions where you can look at glaringly obvious poor decisions by Robins. Saturday they played satisfactory 2nd half which makes the extremely poor first half even worse!
He claimed on arrival the team had quality throughout, yet in the first week brought in 4 loans! (kind of undermined his very first comment!)
Indeed had it not been for McGoldricks run of blinding form, cov would have lost a further 5 games (which would have put coventry on 22 points (out of the relegation zone on goal difference). I just find the cult of robins worship quite frankly laughable.
He hasn't even managed to improve the fitness (as shown by being unable to play 90 mins) - and that ANYONE can achieve.
Robins I'll grant has been extremely fortunate to have received the benefit of DM's form of his career. Far too many games dominated by one man to claim that the TEAM has improved.
Shrewsbury beating city not just once but twice exposed the true poor current state of the team. And he has put all his eggs in 1 basket with the signing of Clarke (the guy who had a strop because he was told to have more training by DiCanio). He hasn't scored now since 20 Nov - Pretty clear his rich run of form has dried up!
MR 3 at MOST. Turned the team around? Rode on the coat-tails of DM's form more like!
Now pretty much everybody on here can see the nonsense you have posted, however would you like to research how many games Clarke has played in since his last goal on the 20th November? Let me help you, his final game for Sc-unithorpe was on the the 24th Nov, granted he did not score. Their next game was on Dec 8th, Clarke did not play due to his loan expiring. He has since made a subs appearance and a start against Tottenham for us....
psgm1 gave himself away when he wrote: "Elliott score 3 goals in 2 games (hardly what you would call prolific)."
TBF, PSGM is an absolute FC. TTFN
You talk some shite in this post, so tell me WHO U think would do a better job. You state elliot has 3 goals in 2 games and stupidly say thats Hardly prolific, and Your slating robins for having to make loans. This is the worst post ive ever read on here hands down
<br />
<br />
The same one posting on the Cov Telegraph boards.
Have you not read any of his previous posts?
Don't let MMM in on any discussion about Waggot for fucks sake!
I'll abstain; as I think my views are well-documented, and I'd hate to be a bore.
Perhaps someone could just tel me what he does?!? Is he the David Bell of the board?
Isn't it the same post rolled out in every single thread? Seems like it! I've stopped paying attention now. There is obviously some sort of personal grudge he has against Robins.
There is obviously some sort of personal grudge he has against Robins.
Surely that is Labvitch ,just what is his role.
I would call you an idiot, but I know a few idiots that you make look highly intelligent :laugh:
i will do it for you
astute your an idiot
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?