John fleck ...did he mean it (2 Viewers)

[Deleted member 7943]

After last week's shocking red for West ham , do you think they got this right ...looks a bit of intent there tbh ...but I'm not sure , fleck wasn't sent off

 

---

[Tommo1993]

Definite red.

 

[Sky_Blue_Dreamer]

I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he does seem to have a quick look down before planting his foot. His foot does slide down onto his head so I'll say that wasn't intentional but standing on the arm may well have been.

I'd have given it a red

 

[Tommo1993]

Think the way he’s travelling, the course his right leg takes just seems to move in an odd direction. Might’ve been an instinctive accident, but I don’t think so.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Put it this way it was easier for him to get his foot out of the way than to rake the player's head.

 

[SkyBlue_Bear83]

Definite red, his reaction tells it all. If it was genuine accident he would have checked the welfare of his opponent, instead he pretends like he didn't do anything and that he is innocent

 

[Wyken Sky Blue]

Fleck could've got out of the way I think, it's a stamp on a players head. Red card all day long

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk

 

[stupot07]

Red card all day long


Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

 

[Moff]

He meant it.
Nasty and sly, definite red card.

 

[Otis]

Yup. No doubt about it.

 

[wingy]

Well I don't know what gets into their heads to do something like that.

 

[no_loyalty]

Definite red, could he still receive a retrospective ban by the FA? or is that only if the ref hasn’t seen it during the game?

 

[Sky_Blue_Dreamer]

Definite red, I think he will receive a retrospective ban by the FA.

Would make a mockery of VAR if they do that.

 

[wingy]

Would make a mockery of VAR if they do that.

Which it has turned out to be .

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

It’s not a stamp but it’s a red