Latibeaudere and Sakamoto, Oggy and Eakin what can go wrong!!!!!
Lati-beaudiere-sakamot-oware
Lati-beaudiere-sakamot-oware
Good loans tend to come towards the end of the window when the parent club have brought a few players in
Did I say that? No, so why you trying to put words into my mouth?
Hamer is the best player we've had for years, we should be pushing the boat out to get him to sign a new contract, if he won't, then we need to replace him with like for like (or as near as) not taking 2 players that someone doesn't want and some cash.
And although Mcnally is good enough I wouldn't want to lose Gus as part of that deal.
With Hamer in the side we have a chance of a playoff finish again. Without him we've got to hope and prey a replacement will be as successful.
loans that compliment a strong permanent backbone would be ideal, not like seasons passed when they had to cover glaring holes in the first xi
We would be using cash to sign a defender so why not mcnally? 2 good young centre halves, 1 with experience of our club and you are dismissing them as unwanted. Do you think with any money we wouldn't replace hamer?
I don't understand your logic at all
Its simple, I'd buy Mcnally for cash, but I wouldn't want to lose Hamer as part of a deal.
If (as we're led to believe, ) Hamer is holding out for more money, the club should pay that money to keep him. Hamer is vital to the way we play, and the best midfielder in the championship (imo)
Our desperate need for defenders isn't a good enough reason to lose Hamer.
(Unless it's 15+million and 2 CH and Scott Twine)
FFS we have signed a player with no legs. DOUG OUT
Your figures for hamer are unrealistic. 1 year on his contract and he isnt getting to anywhere near a deal you propose. If he doesn't sign a deal we sell simple as that. Our best chance of getting mcnally permanently is in this deal.
I'd look elsewhere if they won't sell Mcnally.
Sooner miss out on him than lose Gus
Total speculation, we've no idea what Hamers demands are or what the club has offered.
Yea let's not have any defenders who we know are good enough just to keep gus and lose out on millions. Good call.
Wtf is the matter with you, are you on your period or something?
.
Well, we know Gus is good enough too. Why not invest in him?
Looks like the club share my view!
Sources: Burnley bid rejected for outstanding midfielder as Coventry thwart Gustavo Hamer plan
Coventry City have rejected Burnley's player-plus-cash deal for midfielder Gustavo Hamer, TEAMtalk understands.
www.teamtalk.com
Using that account to back up an opinion is particularly weak. More fantasy than Harry Potter that accountLooks like the club share my view!
Sources: Burnley bid rejected for outstanding midfielder as Coventry thwart Gustavo Hamer plan
Coventry City have rejected Burnley's player-plus-cash deal for midfielder Gustavo Hamer, TEAMtalk understands.
Give it up mate, your entire argument has been proved wrong by the clubs response to Burnley's bid. If you have anger management problems you should get professional help. I'm going to ignore you from now on, so I'd suggest you save your breath
If reports were to be believed, he isn't asking for that kind of silly money. In fact, you've said we don't know his demands or the clubs offer.
Swap deals and Gus asside, how much do you think we should pay for McNally? Just for him, a ball park figure?
Sorry this is taking the topic off track ... welcome to Latibeaudiere, hope he fits in, and nice to see we're getting some defenders in.
Why would Burnley sell him for less than they paid last summer?
What did Burney pay 2M is that structured on add ons?
The only development he got was here for which they've obviously been compensated £2.5M Max.
Is he worth more now ? He hasn’t featured for them hence the lower valuation , with add ons . Possibly up to £3 million in total
