Isn't there a suggestion Rangers may be in for him? It will be an easier move for him if that is the case.
The CT today spoke about 3 possible new signings... the German Mindfielder; the Brazilian Striker and one more striker. Are we to presume therefore that Jennings will not be signing for us? surely if we were going to sign him we
would have done it by now!!!
Is he even still training with us?
was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him
Perhaps Jennings just didn't fancy joining us? I think you are overestimating the appeal of Andy Thorn.
I may be wrong here but I suspect jennings omission from the CT article this morning might just be an oversight. What does worry me slightly about jennings is that he seems to sound like a possible replacement for thomas (this may just be me being paranoid).
Smooth moves gents. So when Fleck joins and states its primarily due to Thorn and his playing style, it's dismissed as platitudes. But when a player doesn't join - for whatever reason - its because Thorn's not a big enough lure?!?
And you wonder why people use the term Thorn-hater?
'was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him'
I was questioning the belief that any player Thorn wants, he gets. Of course he was the player Thorn wanted. Maybe Jennings was here and wasn't all that impressed and has decided he would rather play for Rangers.
'was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him'
I was questioning the belief that any player Thorn wants, he gets. Of course he was the player Thorn wanted. Maybe Jennings was here and wasn't all that impressed and has decided he would rather play for Rangers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?