Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Jennings not signing? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter skybluegg
  • Start date Jul 23, 2012
Forums New posts
S

skybluegg

New Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #1
The CT today spoke about 3 possible new signings... the German Mindfielder; the Brazilian Striker and one more striker. Are we to presume therefore that Jennings will not be signing for us? surely if we were going to sign him we would have done it by now!!!
Is he even still training with us?
 
A

aodea

New Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #2
Be dissapointed by it, was hoping he would come in have only heard good things about the lad.
 

Greggs

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #3
Maybe he feels wages will be better off spent elsewhere? With potentially another 3 coming in, the pot must nearly be empty for sure?
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #4
You may feel annoyed, but if he was good enough I'm sure thorn would have noticed in his trial and signed him up like the other lads!
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #5
I wonder if there's injury issues with his mysterious 'knock' that kept him out the pre-season games.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #6
Isn't there a suggestion Rangers may be in for him? It will be an easier move for him if that is the case.
 

Greggs

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #7
Grendel said:
Isn't there a suggestion Rangers may be in for him? It will be an easier move for him if that is the case.
Click to expand...

I believe he fancied moving back to English football mate
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #8
was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him
 
S

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #9
Yep looks as though he is not in contention, perhaps he didnt fit in, perhaps he has a better offer elsewhere.... Dont see why so many are disappointed in him not signing as many will not have seen him play and at this level there are an abundance of players we could potentially sign.
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #10
skybluegg said:
The CT today spoke about 3 possible new signings... the German Mindfielder; the Brazilian Striker and one more striker. Are we to presume therefore that Jennings will not be signing for us? surely if we were going to sign him we
would have done it by now!!!
Is he even still training with us?
Click to expand...

is the mindfielder uri geller ?
 

BigadamL

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #11
maybe he was in just incase we got rid of Deagan. now that he is back with no problems no need for him.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #12
blueflint said:
was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him
Click to expand...

Perhaps Jennings just didn't fancy joining us? I think you are overestimating the appeal of Andy Thorn.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #13
Sick Boy said:
Perhaps Jennings just didn't fancy joining us? I think you are overestimating the appeal of Andy Thorn.
Click to expand...

Surprising I thought even Messi would saviour the opportunity.
 
A

AndyCov96

New Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #14
They might just be sorting out the deal still, look how long it took to sign marlin king up when he was training with us
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #15
Smooth moves gents. So when Fleck joins and states its primarily due to Thorn and his playing style, it's dismissed as platitudes. But when a player doesn't join - for whatever reason - its because Thorn's not a big enough lure?!?

And you wonder why people use the term Thorn-hater?
 

junglej13

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #16
I may be wrong here but I suspect jennings omission from the CT article this morning might just be an oversight. What does worry me slightly about jennings is that he seems to sound like a possible replacement for thomas (this may just be me being paranoid).
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #17
Sounds a bit fishy to me...

AndyCov96 said:
marlin king
Click to expand...
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #18
junglej13 said:
I may be wrong here but I suspect jennings omission from the CT article this morning might just be an oversight. What does worry me slightly about jennings is that he seems to sound like a possible replacement for thomas (this may just be me being paranoid).
Click to expand...

potential captain Thomas ?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #19
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Smooth moves gents. So when Fleck joins and states its primarily due to Thorn and his playing style, it's dismissed as platitudes. But when a player doesn't join - for whatever reason - its because Thorn's not a big enough lure?!?

And you wonder why people use the term Thorn-hater?
Click to expand...

'was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him'

I was questioning the belief that any player Thorn wants, he gets. Of course he was the player Thorn wanted. Maybe Jennings was here and wasn't all that impressed and has decided he would rather play for Rangers.
 

DazzleTommyDazzle

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #20
Sick Boy said:
'was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him'

I was questioning the belief that any player Thorn wants, he gets. Of course he was the player Thorn wanted. Maybe Jennings was here and wasn't all that impressed and has decided he would rather play for Rangers.
Click to expand...

If a player comes on trial, it seems a reasonable assumption that there is some interest on both sides, but one (or both) party isn't sure - otherwise, why bother with a trial?

I very much doubt that the manager is the deciding influence in many transfers (particularly at this level) - call me a cynic, but my guess is that cash is the driver.

Do I think it likely that if we make Jennings the most lucrative offer, he'd turn us down because he's so unimpressed with Thorn - no (apologies to Grendel, CBourton and Sick Boy).

Do I think that if Rangers make him the best offer, he'd sign for us because he couldn't pass up the chance of playing for Thorn - no.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #21
Sick Boy said:
'was he ever the player thorn wanted if so he would of got him'

I was questioning the belief that any player Thorn wants, he gets. Of course he was the player Thorn wanted. Maybe Jennings was here and wasn't all that impressed and has decided he would rather play for Rangers.
Click to expand...

Or maybe Thorn decided he wasn't in good in reality as he looked on paper? But why does your default position - as above - always have to be Thorn or the club not measuring up to expectation?

Or maybe he's stil on trial and you, like I, know nothing?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #22
He probably will end up staying in Scotland.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?