He was the player exchange plus money for Keogh,, so maybe some truth in this one....
The clue is in the "signed a new contract last year". What makes anyone (including Sky Sports) think we can afford a transfer fee?
I also think that the general football public aren't fully aware of our financial constraints. They just assume that the club doesn't spend money out of choice, I remember previews for last season where some seemed perplexed that we hadn't attempted to strengthen our squad.The clue is in the "signed a new contract last year". What makes anyone (including Sky Sports) think we can afford a transfer fee?
Wilson would be a good signing but he signed a 3 year contract last year. So he would cost money.
Only way he would come is with Keogh going to the other way, but I can't see Keogh signing for Bristol City anyway.
It makes sense as a part-ex for Keogh, but would much rather keep Keogh and risk losing him for free. Although relocating back to Bristol would suit him, as a playing move, it would be a step back to a place where he has mostly bad memories. If he moves again now or next Summer, he should be looking to a side who has serious promotion ambitions from The Championship. Bristol don'him to stayt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?