Point provenAbsolute waste of budget the reason we will have to sell one of the big 3 to balance books is due to wasting money on the likes of Bidwell,Kane,Walker,Waghorn
He's a good player you daft twat,BORING
Not a day goes by when someone lists how many games he’s played who gives a shit he’s pants
Oh fuck off mate and your new troll account.Doesn’t suit our system,I thought the manager would of known that before giving him a silly contract
Tayo will be ahead of him
BORING
Not a day goes by when someone lists how many games he’s played who gives a shit he’s pants
He is a better lb than lwb. We switched today, so having flexibility is useful.Decent LB but not a LWB.
Squad player at best.
Hi BooshI ain’t your mate Drivel
One of the main reasons he was ineffective in the first half is that Panzo, McFadzean and the midfield kept passing behind him, meaning he was having to control it facing his own goal making him go backwards. He is never going to take lots of players on but if we put it into space he gets in decent positions. His crossing was gash today though, although he was the only cov player that managed a single accurate cross all game, he did have 7 attempts.Think it still could be, the track record with him is good.
Pretty much this, there were worse players todayOne of the main reasons he was ineffective in the first half is that Panzo, McFadzean and the midfield kept passing behind him, meaning he was having to control it facing his own goal making him go backwards. He is never going to take lots of players on but if we put it into space he gets in decent positions. His crossing was gash today though, although he was the only cov player that managed a single accurate cross all game, he did have 7 attempts.
I think you have to give the winger credit to managing to create that space against him.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
One of the main reasons he was ineffective in the first half is that Panzo, McFadzean and the midfield kept passing behind him, meaning he was having to control it facing his own goal making him go backwards. He is never going to take lots of players on but if we put it into space he gets in decent positions. His crossing was gash today though, although he was the only cov player that managed a single accurate cross all game, he did have 7 attempts.
I think you have to give the winger credit to managing to create that space against him.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
He was the wing back in a good Swansea team though??
Meaningless that now though, is it not? Waghorn was a top player once, Gyokeres couldn't get in the Swansea team once...
Well it took Gyo a fair bit of time to look the part too.
I'll listen to the argument that he doesn't fit our style, but it's the ones saying he's not a wing back that need it pointed out that he is a wing back, as he's been a very successful one in the Championship over a number of seasons.Meaningless that now though, is it not? Waghorn was a top player once, Gyokeres couldn't get in the Swansea team once...
No, it shows he can play LWB at a good level.Meaningless that now though, is it not? Waghorn was a top player once, Gyokeres couldn't get in the Swansea team once...
This, he can play wingback well.I'll listen to the argument that he doesn't fit our style, but it's the ones saying he's not a wing back that need it pointed out that he is a wing back, as he's been a very successful one in the Championship over a number of seasons.
Anyway, one game does not make a summer.
This, he can play wingback well.
Is he the wingback we need is a different conversation.
Massive overreaction today. He wasn't great, but he wasn't awful. Got in to some good positions but fluffed two really good chances to set someone up. If he has five games like that to start the season, fine, criticism will be deserved but seeing him getting slated after today just shows how much people want to find scapegoats and moan.
Decent wage with decent tenure.
But now we have a) 'potentially' a monster LWB; and b) with Panzo & Doyle, the left side of a back 3 is covered.
Was this a good use of our very limited resources?
If I did, would my question not be valid?Did you have this typed up before the game?
We've yet to see it though.No, it shows he can play LWB at a good level.
He's not a player in decline Waghorn and the fact Cooper didnt fancy Vik has no baring on anything,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?