Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Transfer Rumour Jahnoah Markelo (44 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Winny the Bish
  • Start date Jan 27, 2026
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
First Prev 19 of 19

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 5:59 PM
  • #631
ovduk78 said:
Didn't you rate Panzo and thought we should sign him a couple of years before we unfortunately did?
Click to expand...

Yeah believe it or not I’m not actually applying for the Head of Transfers position. I’d just like us to find someone better than Austin.

I don’t think Nick wants to play left back Saturday either, probably just wants a different professional from Dasilva.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 6:07 PM
  • #632
shmmeee said:
Don’t rate him never have and never will. I think the fact he’s had more to spend than anyone in charge of transfers in our history is skewing your perception of him. I know we’re at the point where people are just farming likes but for those that aren’t trolls and are genuinely curious:

View attachment 48989

That’s championship spend last three seasons. Divide the total spend (red) by the number of players bought. Only Leicester are close in per player spend to us really and they were in the PL for some of those seasons. The others with huge spends are mostly teams in the PL at some point.

We really haven’t over performed our spend massively and it backs up Doug’s feeling that we should be up the top of the league. In terms of absolute spend only Boro are close and they got 50% more players for their cash (and are also up the top).
Click to expand...

OMG you have used transfer market

Not only are the values nonsense - as I already showed the other day - you do realise “arrivals” include players like Ryan Howley and Kai Andrews when their loan period expires

This literally is comedy gold
 
Reactions: hill83, covcity4life, TomRad85 and 1 other person

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 6:18 PM
  • #633
shmmeee said:
Don’t rate him never have and never will. I think the fact he’s had more to spend than anyone in charge of transfers in our history is skewing your perception of him. I know we’re at the point where people are just farming likes but for those that aren’t trolls and are genuinely curious:

View attachment 48989

That’s championship spend last three seasons. Divide the total spend (red) by the number of players bought. Only Leicester are close in per player spend to us really and they were in the PL for some of those seasons. The others with huge spends are mostly teams in the PL at some point.

We really haven’t over performed our spend massively and it backs up Doug’s feeling that we should be up the top of the league. In terms of absolute spend only Boro are close and they got 50% more players for their cash (and are also up the top).
Click to expand...

Though those figures are questionable given the source, even if they are not, I’m not sure how you interpret that as anything other than; we’ve done pretty well with our transfer business?
 
Reactions: CovRes, covcity4life, TomRad85 and 1 other person

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 6:19 PM
  • #634
ovduk78 said:
Didn't you rate Panzo and thought we should sign him a couple of years before we unfortunately did?
Click to expand...

Tbf I also thought (and still do, kind of) think Panzo was a technically proficient footballer. He was just a really terrible defender!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 6:28 PM
  • #635
Ryan Howley actually featured three times as arrivals in the period quoted
 
Reactions: TomRad85

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 7:20 PM
  • #636
shmmeee said:
We really haven’t over performed our spend massively and it backs up Doug’s feeling that we should be up the top of the league. In terms of absolute spend only Boro are close and they got 50% more players for their cash (and are also up the top).
Click to expand...

Isn't the story of football clubs in this country that most of them consistently under perform vs. what they spend on transfers? so if we're doing as well as we should and getting value from players, that's a good job being done.

I think you're missing a big thing. It's known we don't pay the wages lots of clubs do, parachute clubs or not. All data shows that wages paid is the biggest driver of performance in football. In that respect, I think we over perform.

Last season I was of the opinion that Lampard achieved par with the squad, albeit he had to recover from a poor start. He's exceeded that until Xmas. Final chunk of the season will decide if he's over performing spend and wages.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 7:48 PM
  • #637
Out of interest @shmmeee, you were very vocally anti-Lampard before he joined, and for a fair bit after, essentially throwing all toys out of the pram in the online sense (we all deal with stuff in different ways, it’s kool!).

But in essence you are also suggesting that the players we have recruited are not very good, which is an opinion of course.

So either you must think Lampard is doing / has done a blinding job for about a year (second half of last season, first half of this one) with poor quality players. Or maybe the opposite? It’s a genuine question, I’m not sure exactly where you stand.

I personally think Lampard has done a little bit of a better job than the actual ability of our players so far.
 
Reactions: nicksar and CovRes

eyesee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 7:55 PM
  • #638
Jamesimus said:
Out of interest @shmmeee, you were very vocally anti-Lampard before he joined, and for a fair bit after, essentially throwing all toys out of the pram in the online sense (we all deal with stuff in different ways, it’s kool!).

But in essence you are also suggesting that the players we have recruited are not very good, which is an opinion of course.

So either you must think Lampard is doing / has done a blinding job for about a year (second half of last season, first half of this one) with poor quality players. Or maybe the opposite? It’s a genuine question, I’m not sure exactly where you stand.

I personally think Lampard has done a little bit of a better job than the actual ability of our players so far.
Click to expand...
the reset button has been hit. we are top, but our lead has pretty much gone.
so now we find out who's good, and who's not. players and staff alike.
we have as close to a fully fit team as it practically possible at this time of year. (inc rudi carrying his shoulder, and others still not quite 100% match fit. but that's the norm for teams, right?)

so, come on guys, shit or get off the pot.
 
Reactions: Winny the Bish

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:16 PM
  • #639
Jamesimus said:
Out of interest @shmmeee, you were very vocally anti-Lampard before he joined, and for a fair bit after, essentially throwing all toys out of the pram in the online sense (we all deal with stuff in different ways, it’s kool!).

But in essence you are also suggesting that the players we have recruited are not very good, which is an opinion of course.

So either you must think Lampard is doing / has done a blinding job for about a year (second half of last season, first half of this one) with poor quality players. Or maybe the opposite? It’s a genuine question, I’m not sure exactly where you stand.

I personally think Lampard has done a little bit of a better job than the actual ability of our players so far.
Click to expand...

Check my avatar for around a year and the thread that goes with it. I think despite me not thinking the football is great his results speak for themselves and he’s probably doing the right tactics for the squad and level we are at.

I am worried he’s lost his head a bit recently, but I’d say that about everyone involved with the club. These are head losing times.
 
Reactions: mmttww, Sky Blue Pete, Grendel and 1 other person

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:22 PM
  • #640
shmmeee said:
Check my avatar for around a year and the thread that goes with it. I think despite me not thinking the football is great his results speak for themselves and he’s probably doing the right tactics for the squad and level we are at.

I am worried he’s lost his head a bit recently, but I’d say that about everyone involved with the club. These are head losing times.
Click to expand...

The appointment concerned me at first - I wanted Kim Hellberg! But I was willing to give him time.

I think he came in and looked to solidify us and waited for a few players to come in / come back, assessed the squad eventually opting for his preferred formation.

I think his formation matches what our personnel do “well” and plays to our strengths. Unfortunately, probably like you, I think we need to be a little less footballing in away games and just more horrible. I don’t think that is something we particularly know how to do / plays to our strengths though.

I think we probably have a “top 6 deck” but hopefully Lampard can keep us in the top 2.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:31 PM
  • #641
Jamesimus said:
The appointment concerned me at first - I wanted Kim Hellberg! But I was willing to give him time.

I think he came in and looked to solidify us and waited for a few players to come in / come back, assessed the squad eventually opting for his preferred formation.

I think his formation matches what our personnel do “well” and plays to our strengths. Unfortunately, probably like you, I think we need to be a little less footballing in away games and just more horrible. I don’t think that is something we particularly know how to do / plays to our strengths though.

I think we probably have a “top 6 deck” but hopefully Lampard can keep us in the top 2.
Click to expand...

I mean most seasons let’s be honest we’d be about third or fourth right now. We’re lucky the parachute clubs are all underperforming but we’re the best of the rest which is what we should hope for and he’s delivering.

What I don’t get is that our flexibility was our strength earlier on in the season and recently it seems we are too inflexible. I think a big chunk of blame goes to the players who let’s face it have bottled things a few times over multiple managers now but Lampard has also never been here as a manager and we don’t know if he has that ability to get the group back on track. Though that’s not all on him.
 
Reactions: eyesee and Sky Blue Pete
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:43 PM
  • #642
shmmeee said:
I mean most seasons let’s be honest we’d be about third or fourth right now. We’re lucky the parachute clubs are all underperforming but we’re the best of the rest which is what we should hope for and he’s delivering.

What I don’t get is that our flexibility was our strength earlier on in the season and recently it seems we are too inflexible. I think a big chunk of blame goes to the players who let’s face it have bottled things a few times over multiple managers now but Lampard has also never been here as a manager and we don’t know if he has that ability to get the group back on track. Though that’s not all on him.
Click to expand...

If we were third or fourth right now we will still be out performing our playing cost budget. We are a lower half team based on playing budget.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:46 PM
  • #643
Deity said:
If we were third or fourth right now we will still be out performing our playing cost budget. We are a lower half team based on playing budget.
Click to expand...
Im not sure we are anymore really , we are outperforming our budget but i doubt very much we are a bottom half team in that regards
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:46 PM
  • #644
shmmeee said:
I mean most seasons let’s be honest we’d be about third or fourth right now. We’re lucky the parachute clubs are all underperforming but we’re the best of the rest which is what we should hope for and he’s delivering.

What I don’t get is that our flexibility was our strength earlier on in the season and recently it seems we are too inflexible. I think a big chunk of blame goes to the players who let’s face it have bottled things a few times over multiple managers now but Lampard has also never been here as a manager and we don’t know if he has that ability to get the group back on track. Though that’s not all on him.
Click to expand...
I think that’s right
Lampard should be more flexible but many players are making individual errors and others are way below their previous levels
 
Reactions: eyesee

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:50 PM
  • #645
shmmeee said:
These are head losing times.
Click to expand...

 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:56 PM
  • #646
mmttww said:
Isn't the story of football clubs in this country that most of them consistently under perform vs. what they spend on transfers? so if we're doing as well as we should and getting value from players, that's a good job being done.

I think you're missing a big thing. It's known we don't pay the wages lots of clubs do, parachute clubs or not. All data shows that wages paid is the biggest driver of performance in football. In that respect, I think we over perform.

Last season I was of the opinion that Lampard achieved par with the squad, albeit he had to recover from a poor start. He's exceeded that until Xmas. Final chunk of the season will decide if he's over performing spend and wages.
Click to expand...
Well it could be a factor in our recent drop off in form,who knows though.
 
Reactions: nicksar

nicksar

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:59 PM
  • #647
Jamesimus said:
I personally think Lampard has done a little bit of a better job than the actual ability of our players so far.
Click to expand...
I've said several times that Frank & his coaching team have done a remarkable job getting our squad to the top of the League.
Hopefully the new singings (particularly Esse &Onyeka) will have a similar effect to Matt Grimes last year.
 
Reactions: junglej13 and wingy

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • 59 minutes ago
  • #648
Deity said:
If we were third or fourth right now we will still be out performing our playing cost budget. We are a lower half team based on playing budget.
Click to expand...

Define budget. I have no idea what our wage budget is but rumours are multiple players on £20k+ a week, in terms of transfer spend absolutely not, we are top six.
 
D

Deity

Well-Known Member
  • 41 minutes ago
  • #649
shmmeee said:
Define budget. I have no idea what our wage budget is but rumours are multiple players on £20k+ a week, in terms of transfer spend absolutely not, we are top six.
Click to expand...

Playing Budget … a combination of incoming player costs and salaries plus existing player costs minus outgoing player transfer fees and salaries.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete
S

SkyBlueMatt

Well-Known Member
  • 25 minutes ago
  • #650
shmmeee said:
Define budget. I have no idea what our wage budget is but rumours are multiple players on £20k+ a week, in terms of transfer spend absolutely not, we are top six.
Click to expand...
I'd put our net spend on transfers around the top half.

As for wages, the 3 recent PL clubs, Sheffield United, Birmingham & Wrexham will be spending more. Then Norwich / Bristol City are known for inflated wage bills.

Not that any of that is a bad thing as I prefer us to keep within our limits.

Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • 12 minutes ago
  • #651
Grendel said:
OMG you have used transfer market

Not only are the values nonsense - as I already showed the other day - you do realise “arrivals” include players like Ryan Howley and Kai Andrews when their loan period expires

This literally is comedy gold
Click to expand...
Far be it from me to defend an argument based on Transfermarkt data, but surely over-counting the number of arrivals would mean the cost-per-player would in reality be even higher?

The biggest and most obvious argument against Austin’s signings being rubbish would be that we’re currently top of the league…
 

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
  • 4 minutes ago
  • #652
mmttww said:
View attachment 48993
Click to expand...
Does this explain our depp in form?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
First Prev 19 of 19
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • SBTA moment ago
  • Becksy3 minutes ago
  • SkyblueSC3 minutes ago
  • ovduk784 minutes ago
  • Winny the Bish4 minutes ago
  • TomRad854 minutes ago
  • JimmyHillsbeard4 minutes ago
  • Ccfc19794 minutes ago
  • Terry_dactyl5 minutes ago
  • Merseyskyblue5 minutes ago
  • montydon875 minutes ago
  • PUSB_1987_5 minutes ago
  • Cally Fedora6 minutes ago
  • Sky Blue since 929 minutes ago
  • AFCCOVENTRY11 minutes ago
  • colinc11 minutes ago
  • itsabuzzard11 minutes ago
  • Gynnsthetonic11 minutes ago
  • Ricketts12 minutes ago
  • speedie8712 minutes ago
  • HadjiChippo13 minutes ago
  • Pusb113 minutes ago
  • Skyblueabo111113 minutes ago
  • brez15 minutes ago
  • ... and 3 more.
  • Total: 42 (members: 27, guests: 15)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?