Sick Boy
Super Moderator
I agree 100% - it’s a really bizarre signing considering the position we’re in.
I agree 100% - it’s a really bizarre signing considering the position we’re in.It would have been better spent elsewhere
Dean Austin masterclassI agree 100% - it’s a really bizarre signing considering the position we’re in.
We currenlty have a keeper with an ACL injury registered, a terrible overseas signing LB and a player whos not even fit for the bench.I agree 100% - it’s a really bizarre signing considering the position we’re in.
Well yup. I just assumed he was a player we brought in now because he could help us right now.I agree 100% - it’s a really bizarre signing considering the position we’re in.
Well yup. I just assumed he was a player we brought in now because he could help us right now.
Very odd really.
There is literally no point. Should just not register him.He will, it’s just the Swiss league was on a winter break. Hopefully start seeing him soon on the bench.
There is literally no point. Should just not register him.
He says it in the interview
Well, if Saddles is right (not saying he is), he is saying we won't see Markelo this season..He will, it’s just the Swiss league was on a winter break. Hopefully start seeing him soon on the bench.
Well, if Saddles is right (not saying he is), he is saying we won't see Markelo this season..
Whether that's from insider information or just a guess, I don't know.
Frank wasn't that definitive. He just said he was rusty, unfit and bought as one permanent for the future amongst the loanees.There’s no inside info. Frank said he’s been on a break so we need to get his fitness up and he will have a part to play this season.
Yes but now we signed 2 more wingers it means we wont have to play Asante behind the striker as much.One of the reason clubs don’t just leave transfers to managers is that they would always focus on now, they would never plan for the future. Managers are judged on now, they will never forward plan.
I wasn’t too bothered that Doug vetoed Bamford because I thought it was because he felt we could do better in January.
It looks now like we won’t sign a striker this window which leaves us just 3 strikers which is fine when all 3 are fit ( given we start with only 1 ) but when we play BTS in the 10, or one is out injured / suspended, 3 is not sufficient …..
One of the reason clubs don’t just leave transfers to managers is that they would always focus on now, they would never plan for the future. Managers are judged on now, they will never forward plan.
I wasn’t too bothered that Doug vetoed Bamford because I thought it was because he felt we could do better in January.
It looks now like we won’t sign a striker this window which leaves us just 3 strikers which is fine when all 3 are fit ( given we start with only 1 ) but when we play BTS in the 10, or one is out injured / suspended, 3 is not sufficient …..
He did say available to us now as wellFrank wasn't that definitive. He just said he was rusty, unfit and bought as one permanent for the future amongst the loanees.
Well why don't teams split the transfer budget? Set a percentage up for now, which the manager has a big say in, and part set aside for longer term projects? You can obviously change the split depending on a season (e.g. if you're looking strong for promotion and need some additions to bolster the current squad).One of the reason clubs don’t just leave transfers to managers is that they would always focus on now, they would never plan for the future. Managers are judged on now, they will never forward plan.
I wasn’t too bothered that Doug vetoed Bamford because I thought it was because he felt we could do better in January.
It looks now like we won’t sign a striker this window which leaves us just 3 strikers which is fine when all 3 are fit ( given we start with only 1 ) but when we play BTS in the 10, or one is out injured / suspended, 3 is not sufficient …..
Will remind you of this post in 6 weeks time.Dean Austin masterclass
Reckon he will have played a game in 6 weeks?Will remind you of this post in 6 weeks time.
And again in a years time.
This is what I could find, obviously in a written snippet it doesn’t have everything he says but I’d love to hear that he said this was the best target out of 25 we were looking at and he’s always been our No.1, that will give me some reassurance. You’d have to assume surely Manneh was No.1 target originally as it’s something we’ve been hearing about for months
Frank Lampard explains Coventry City's latest transfer Jahnoah Markelo
Coventry City transfer news from CoventryLive as Frank Lampard reveals the decision behind signing another right wingerwww.coventrytelegraph.net
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The owner having ‘the final say’ is true for most, if not every single club. From this excerpt, it seems pretty clear to me that Lampard was involved to signing off on the transfer.More weird quote that don’t really support the “manager has the final say” idea that’s vigorously defended on here.
View attachment 48931
The owner having ‘the final say’ is true for most, if not every single club. From this excerpt, it seems pretty clear to me that Lampard was involved to signing off on the transfer.
An interview markelo did in Dutch media said he had 2 teams calls with lampard prior to signing. Lampard even called him as he was about to sign elsewhere.Is it? What gives you that impression?
It’s more the “I trust Dean. I talk to Dean. My role as Head Coach is different”. To me seems more consistent with Robins quotes about signings and not being that involved in selection of players.
An interview markelo did in Dutch media said he had 2 teams calls with lampard prior to signing. Lampard even called him as he was about to sign elsewhere.
Not as much as promotion, but maybe that's untrue as it all gets soaked up in being there?To make money in the future.
An interview markelo did in Dutch media said he had 2 teams calls with lampard prior to signing. Lampard even called him as he was about to sign elsewhere.
Yep exactly. Like he did with Bamford.I think maybe people are misinterpreting what is meant by the owner having the final say,
I don't belief the owner will decide what positions need strengthening or which players are most suitable.
He will have the final say on value for money and what and when money can be spent
He may have taken the view that he wasn't prepared to pay an out of work football player more than anyone else at the club.Yep exactly. Like he did with Bamford.
I think maybe people are misinterpreting what is meant by the owner having the final say,
I don't belief the owner will decide what positions need strengthening or which players are most suitable.
He will have the final say on value for money and what and when money can be spent
Well it suggests Lampard is well involved in transfers which you initmated he wasnt
Well it suggests Lampard is well involved in transfers which you initmated he wasnt
Exactly. He presumably thought his money could be better spent.Yep exactly. Like he did with Bamford.
It doesn't work quite like that but it's fair to say Dean Austin and his scouts do the majority of the recruitment/identifying possible signings work.I’ve not claimed he has zero involvement. But everything from the club suggests it’s mostly about trusting Dean Austin and maybe the manager gives a once over at the end then Doug gives the final yes or no. Frank having a zoom chat doesn’t really change that opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?