Israel - Palestinian Conflict (6 Viewers)

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Its not that simple in reality because there's case law which applies.

That shows, as the Met have been repeatedly warned, that there is a near zero chance of successfully prosecuting someone merely for having a sign. You need to be able to demonstrate active support both for the proscribed group and that the offender is either directly taking part in terrorist activity or encouraging others to do so.

There's then the added complexity that yesterday there was an organised protest against the proscription of PA off the back of the government losing in court and PA being allowed to appeal the decision. You can legally protest against the act of proscription itself.

There's plenty of laws that get broken week in week out. We're repeatedly told there aren't the resources to deal with it. Try getting the police to come out if your car is stolen or someone tries to break in to your house. You are likely to be waiting days, if you ever see anyone at all.

So we know that the police have to take a decision over where to target their resources and the argument that some are making is that there is a disproportionate response being seen here and questions over who has instructed this to be the case around the country.

Yesterday the Met brought in officers from other forces and had to create a temporary holding facility as they don't have the facilities to hold the number of people they were hoping to arrest.

I'm not sure anyone can look at the footage of the protesters and think there was a grave threat if they were just allowed to sit there quietly for a few hours.
The met will have only been able to do that with permission from the home secretary and most likely extra funding.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator

Oh yeah, look at his lovely words about the massacre on October the 7th. Defend that then super moderator, should be embarrassed

parrot GIF
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member

Oh yeah, look at his lovely words about the massacre on October the 7th. Defend that then super moderator, should be embarrassed

Irrespective of what he has written, and if you agree with it or not, killing journalists is a war crime and the IDF have admitted that the journalists killed were deliberately targeted.
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Irrespective of what he has written, and if you agree with it or now, killing journalists is a war crime and the IDF have admitted that the journalists killed were deliberately targeted.

Its hardly irrespective - the comments made are not exactly those from a journalist
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Irrespective of what he has written, and if you agree with it or now, killing journalists is a war crime and the IDF have admitted that the journalists killed were deliberately targeted.
He was actively cheering them on killing women and men on October the 7th, even for you that is low
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
so catching up, we're now in the 'blowing up unarmed people is fine as long as someone can post a probs. unverified screenshot from one of them saying sh*t things on the internet' phase of trolling?
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
so catching up, we're now in the 'blowing up unarmed people is fine as long as someone can post a probs. unverified screenshot from one of them saying sh*t things on the internet' phase of trolling?
Here he is, making absolute bullshit up again to get a few likes by his internet forum friends

How obvious you’d find a way out of getting out criticising someone making a post calling for the slaughter of people
 
Last edited:

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Here he is, making absolute bullshit up again to get a few likes by his internet forum friends

How obvious you’d find a way out of getting out criticising someone making a post calling for the slaughter of people
1. Let’s verify the message first

2. Look on the first few pages on the thread, nobody supports the killing of civilians. Except for Hamas and Israel
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
How obvious you’d find a way out of getting out criticising someone making a post calling for the slaughter of people

is that how you think this works? You post something and everyone's obliged to rush to say what you want them to? a bit needy for someone who's on here telling folks how sad they are for how much time they spend on the forum.

Assuming the Telegram msg is legit and from the person who was killed, do you think it justifies them being blown up along with others? Half the forum would probably be due in front of a firing squad if that's the way you think it should be.

No clue why I'm spending my precious sh*tter time replying to you as you don't believe anything you type and you're here for attention and to 'fish for lefties' but there it is! You can reply to this, then I'll post a .GIF and you can hit 'poop' 💩
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

mmttww

Well-Known Member


assume the IDF is suddenly downing tools under all the heat from the latest round of condemnation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top