fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
The met will have only been able to do that with permission from the home secretary and most likely extra funding.
The met will have only been able to do that with permission from the home secretary and most likely extra funding.Its not that simple in reality because there's case law which applies.
That shows, as the Met have been repeatedly warned, that there is a near zero chance of successfully prosecuting someone merely for having a sign. You need to be able to demonstrate active support both for the proscribed group and that the offender is either directly taking part in terrorist activity or encouraging others to do so.
There's then the added complexity that yesterday there was an organised protest against the proscription of PA off the back of the government losing in court and PA being allowed to appeal the decision. You can legally protest against the act of proscription itself.
There's plenty of laws that get broken week in week out. We're repeatedly told there aren't the resources to deal with it. Try getting the police to come out if your car is stolen or someone tries to break in to your house. You are likely to be waiting days, if you ever see anyone at all.
So we know that the police have to take a decision over where to target their resources and the argument that some are making is that there is a disproportionate response being seen here and questions over who has instructed this to be the case around the country.
Yesterday the Met brought in officers from other forces and had to create a temporary holding facility as they don't have the facilities to hold the number of people they were hoping to arrest.
I'm not sure anyone can look at the footage of the protesters and think there was a grave threat if they were just allowed to sit there quietly for a few hours.
Anas al-Sharif, prominent Al Jazeera correspondent, among five journalists killed in Israeli airstrike on Gaza
Israel admits deliberate attack on the journalist, known for frontline coverage, in a strike on a tent outside al-Shifa hospitalwww.theguardian.com
Oh yeah, look at his lovely words about the massacre on October the 7th. Defend that then super moderator, should be embarrassed
Oh what so you actively support someone who was happy with hundreds of people being slaughtered and calling for it to continue, very very concerning
Oh what so you actively support someone who was happy with hundreds of people being slaughtered and calling for it to continue, very very concerning
Israel have now killed around 60,000 people. Your thoughts on that?Oh what so you actively support someone who was happy with hundreds of people being slaughtered and calling for it to continue, very very concerning
Irrespective of what he has written, and if you agree with it or not, killing journalists is a war crime and the IDF have admitted that the journalists killed were deliberately targeted.Oh yeah, look at his lovely words about the massacre on October the 7th. Defend that then super moderator, should be embarrassed
Irrespective of what he has written, and if you agree with it or now, killing journalists is a war crime and the IDF have admitted that the journalists killed were deliberately targeted.
He was actively cheering them on killing women and men on October the 7th, even for you that is lowIrrespective of what he has written, and if you agree with it or now, killing journalists is a war crime and the IDF have admitted that the journalists killed were deliberately targeted.
How so? I was just stating international law. If you think the law is incorrect moaning at me isn't going to do much to change it.He was actively cheering them on killing women men and children on October the 7th, even for you that is low
Do you condemn his posts? Let’s see if you can say yes without trying to spin itHow so? I was just stating international law. If you think the law is incorrect moaning at me isn't going to do much to change it.
I see that Mr ‘Breaking the law has consequences’ from the previous page has miraculously rediscovered the art of nuanceIts hardly irrespective - the comments made are not exactly those from a journalist
Why would I want or need to spin it? I don't think celebrating the killing of anyone is something you'd do anything other than condemn.Do you condemn his posts? Let’s see if you can say yes without trying to spin it
Here he is, making absolute bullshit up again to get a few likes by his internet forum friendsso catching up, we're now in the 'blowing up unarmed people is fine as long as someone can post a probs. unverified screenshot from one of them saying sh*t things on the internet' phase of trolling?
1. Let’s verify the message firstHere he is, making absolute bullshit up again to get a few likes by his internet forum friends
How obvious you’d find a way out of getting out criticising someone making a post calling for the slaughter of people
How obvious you’d find a way out of getting out criticising someone making a post calling for the slaughter of people
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?