Is today? - Retained List Thread (1 Viewer)

Chipfat · May 9, 2016

Are Lawton, Finch and Kelly Evans Twins contracts up now as well?, if so i would keep the twins see how they go with another 1st team pre season behind them and maybe give Lawton a season to get fit and push on.

As for the list above not much worth keeping in my opinion, Stokes, Martin are the ones that could play a part next season as Fleck and OB will be off i would of thought.

letsallsingtogether · May 9, 2016

steve82 said:
I'm hoping for Arron Martin and Phillips to extend there deals. Maybe Tudgay to but I can see him leaving for 1st team football at Chesterfield or someone in that area of the country.

Tudgay Off to China I believe.

Esoterica · May 9, 2016

fernandopartridge said:
Henderson I would dismiss on the basis of his weight, mobility and prospects of realistic short or long term success. That said, the one on one comedy against Peterborough is reason enough.

When the wind blows in the right direction you can still hear laughter from the direction of Scunthorpe!

Winny the Bish · May 9, 2016

Chipfat said:
Are Lawton, Finch and Kelly Evans Twins contracts up now as well?, if so i would keep the twins see how they go with another 1st team pre season behind them and maybe give Lawton a season to get fit and push on.

As for the list above not much worth keeping in my opinion, Stokes, Martin are the ones that could play a part next season as Fleck and OB will be off i would of thought.

I'd keep Lawton and the twins on for another year as well, no harm in that whatsoever. Lawton didn't get a chance this year because of the ACL injury and the twins are both very versatile and can play anywhere. The three of them together would probably earn less a week than a Ramage/Henderson/Hunt as well.

SkyBlueZack · May 9, 2016

Need shot of CT and Phillips. Wages can be put to better use. If Ricketts is a positive influence in dressing room, can't he just be a coach? Would rather give the young lads a go or maybe try and pick up another Stokes.

Nick · May 9, 2016

Forgot about Conor Thomas, if he is one of the highest earners then let him go.

I wonder if he would go to another L1 club or lower.

Oz Howie · May 9, 2016

He would have to agree to his contract being cancelled. Not likely in my opinion.

Nick · May 9, 2016

Oz Howie said:
He would have to agree to his contract being cancelled. Not likely in my opinion.

Isn't it up?

http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/thomas-new-contract-1170240.aspx

Oz Howie · May 9, 2016

Looks as though it is, so the question should be do we offer to resign him or not?

Nick · May 9, 2016

Oz Howie said:
Looks as though it is, so the question should be do we offer to resign him or not?

It doesn't look like he is anywhere near the first team, I doubt we will.

covcity4life · May 9, 2016

ccfc92 said:
Those who are out of contract, from CET site:

Jim O'Brien
Conor Thomas
Martin Lorentzson
Aaron Phillips
Aaron Martin
Peter Ramage
Marc-Antoine Fortune
Stephen Hunt
Darius Henderson
John Fleck
Marcus Tudgay
Chris Stokes
Reda Johnson
Sam Ricketts

bold=keep
underlines=maybe
rest get rid

exciting summer ahead

Oz Howie · May 9, 2016

From memory and at my age that's dangerous, wasn't TM impressed with his technical ability?

Covbaker96 · May 9, 2016

Retained list now expected later today
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/coventry-city-live-find-out-11305694

steve82 · May 9, 2016

With regards to Connor Thomas his contract is deffinatly up and its really irrelevant what he was earning. If TM should offer him new terms it would be exactly that, a offer reflective of his impact and value to to club.
In all honesty I think it's time he left for pastures new...

steve82 · May 9, 2016

Covbaker96 said:
Retained list now expected later today
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/coventry-city-live-find-out-11305694

Around 5 pm telegraph quoting.

ccfc92 · May 9, 2016

When they say retained, is it who they will offer new contracts to?

It's not the players agreeing to stay/sign a new contract, so we could still lose players we want to keep?

AFCCOVENTRY · May 9, 2016

In a sadistic kind of way this is exciting. It will also show if Mogga has learned from the lessons this season on who he keeps.

tom88 · May 9, 2016

When they say retained, is it who they will offer new contracts to?

It's not the players agreeing to stay/sign a new contract, so we could still lose players we want to keep?

This is the exact question I have

I would assume its the players he wishes to keep and offered a new contact too.

ccfc92 · May 9, 2016

AFCCOVENTRY said:
In a sadistic kind of way this is exciting. It will also show if Mogga has learned from the lessons this season on who he keeps.

I know was you mean AFC. Cutting all the deadwood will be a big boost for the club and the wage bill, and hopefully allow us to use our limited funds to build a decent squad.

AFCCOVENTRY · May 9, 2016

tom88 said:
This is the exact question I have

I would assume its the players he wishes to keep and offered a new contact too.

Form what I understand it's who is being released and who will be offered new contracts.

New contracts subject to negotiation and agreement of course.

We will know for sure which players are being released.

ccfc92 · May 9, 2016

tom88 said:
This is the exact question I have

I would assume its the players he wishes to keep and offered a new contact too.

Yeah, the agents will have to drag things out first and get themselves a nice cut :jerkit:

ajsccfc · May 9, 2016

ccfc92 said:
When they say retained, is it who they will offer new contracts to?

It's not the players agreeing to stay/sign a new contract, so we could still lose players we want to keep?

I think so. It's really a list players who are definitely going and a list of who might not.

Gazolba · May 9, 2016

I bet he keeps Fortune.

AFCCOVENTRY · May 9, 2016

Gazolba said:
I bet he keeps Fortune.

Fortune and Ricketts. I can see it now...

Chipfat · May 9, 2016

Says Ricketts maybe offered a deal to stay and Reda in talks while, Martin will be released. That surely doesn't sound right Keep the crock with and Sam "no legs" Ricketts while getting rid of a player who has been very good this season and is the right age and experience.

ajsccfc · May 9, 2016

If Martin's not on the retained list it surely has to be that he wants to go elsewhere rather than Mowbray not wanting to keep him. Makes little sense the other way.

covcity4life · May 9, 2016

martins not the physical beast TM wants i dont think, he improved loads 2nd half of season but would he have even got into the team at all if cargill had not got injured? who knows

Chipfat · May 9, 2016

Yeah sort of see that TM wants a more physical CB which is why i suppose Willis plays wide as he prefers his athleticism more than physicality. But would of thought Martin pushing for a place is better than Ricketts and Reda in the stand watching on. Or in Reda's case someone else's stand!!!!!!!!!!!

sw88 · May 9, 2016

Would keep Martin, Stokes and Lorentzen.

Would add Fleck to that but think he's already gone!

Been a decent servant and is clearly better than league one though so wouldn't dislike him if he went

Always be a legend to me

covcity4life · May 9, 2016

dunno bout legend but yeh i like him

ccfc92 · May 9, 2016

covcity4life said:
martins not the physical beast TM wants i dont think, he improved loads 2nd half of season but would he have even got into the team at all if cargill had not got injured? who knows

Martin was doing well at the start of the season too, before getting injured

ajsccfc · May 9, 2016

Do Rangers fans like Fleck still? I could see him going back there.

ccfc92 · May 9, 2016

ajsccfc said:
Do Rangers fans like Fleck still? I could see him going back there.

Why wouldn't they?

Nick · May 9, 2016

ccfc92 said:
Why wouldn't they?

Because of how he left

ajsccfc · May 9, 2016

He wasn't the player they'd hoped and then left when they had the unpleasantness, I'm sure I read that he wasn't exactly a local hero.

Is today? - Retained List Thread (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Member

Administrator

Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Chief Commentator!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency