Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Is CCFC England's latest franchise club? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Neutral Fan
  • Start date Jul 30, 2014
Forums New posts

Neutral Fan

Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #1
I fear it is. SISU are a hedge fund. Their sole purpose is to make money. They know nothing about football (as is clear).

For those who don't know, down the road from here, a fella called Winkie owned some land in Milton Keynes. He got Asda to agree to build a whole stadium for him for free if they could also build a supermarket. The council gave permission with a Section 106 requiring a league team to play at the stadium.

Winkie persuaded the FL appeals committee to allow WFC to be franchised to MK. His property deal was sealed and a free stadium was his.

Sound a bit familiar? SISU want a stadium for a song and are happy to mess the FC around and use the GS/franchise to achieve it.

I've always thought SISU have been using MK Dons as their business model. Todays reports convince me even more.

Where will CCFC end up? The FL in London would consider anywhere in the WM as "the Coventry area" as what would they know? Or maybe SISU have more radical ideas...who knows? The club could end up anywhere or the GS/franchise just sold on to anyone?
 

skybluebeduff

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #2
No! We're not another MK Dons. Simple really.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #3
A nice simple no. You could have saved yourself 10 minutes really.
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #4
Neutral Fan said:
I fear it is. SISU are a hedge fund. Their sole purpose is to make money. They know nothing about football (as is clear).

For those who don't know, down the road from here, a fella called Winkie owned some land in Milton Keynes. He got Asda to agree to build a whole stadium for him for free if they could also build a supermarket. The council gave permission with a Section 106 requiring a league team to play at the stadium.

Winkie persuaded the FL appeals committee to allow WFC to be franchised to MK. His property deal was sealed and a free stadium was his.

Sound a bit familiar? SISU want a stadium for a song and are happy to mess the FC around and use the GS/franchise to achieve it.

I've always thought SISU have been using MK Dons as their business model. Todays reports convince me even more.

Where will CCFC end up? The FL in London would consider anywhere in the WM as "the Coventry area" as what would they know? Or maybe SISU have more radical ideas...who knows? The club could end up anywhere or the GS/franchise just sold on to anyone?
Click to expand...


Very easy to stir it and start potentially false rumours but what you've posted about CCFC is purely speculation completely without foundation.

If we don't return to the Ricoh on a temporary basis then I anticipate a new stadium will be built within 6 miles of the City centre.

You can believe whatever you like but how far from the City centre is the Ricoh?
 
L

Limey

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #5
I initially feared this a year or more back. However, I now believe that SISU do not have the minerals to pull off such a manoeuvre. More likely they will continue the demise of CCFC until we have to start up a new club (at the Ricoh).
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #6
What's the crack with OP? Goes out of his way to say he's "neutral" which is suspicious enough, but 90% of his posts are about us being a "franchise".

Curious.

Edit: For the sake of clarity, can I explain why this is such a monumentally stupid idea? We are the biggest city without a football team, if someone was going to create a new franchise Coventry is the obvious choice for a location. MK was a special situation as a new town with no history.

Let's say we entertain this idea for a second, where exactly do you think the club would move to? Or are you seriously suggesting that Northampton can support two league sides?
 
Last edited: Jul 30, 2014

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #7
shmmeee said:
We are the biggest city without a football team, if someone was going to create a new franchise Coventry is the obvious choice for a location. MK was a special situation as a new town with no history.

Let's say we entertain this idea for a second, where exactly do you think the club would move to? Or are you seriously suggesting that Northampton can support two league sides?
Click to expand...

This is the biggest reason the franchise idea is nonsense. Look at the most populated areas in the country and work your way down the list until you find somewhere without a professional football team. At one point with Northampton in trouble and ground upgrades on the way at Sixfields I did wonder about some sort of takeover / merger but I highly doubt that would happen.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #8
It isn't hard, Wakefield has a bigger population and no league football team.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #9
Nick said:
It isn't hard, Wakefield has a bigger population and no league football team.
Click to expand...

Wakefield has a population of 78,000 - and i think you know that.
 

Neutral Fan

Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #10
Guys I'm just a footie supporter who hates the way crap businessmen are damaging the game. Live in Northampton, though Cobblers not my team...watch them sometimes though.

Hate to see CCFC here for the reasons above. And tbh disappointed some Cov fans gave money to Winkie given what I see as similarities with their own team.

Think the Hedge fund is using your club to help secure some cheap real estate. That's it really.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #11
Grendel said:
Wakefield has a population of 78,000 - and i think you know that.
Click to expand...

Ay? I checked here http://www.ukcities.co.uk/populations/ and Wikipedia. Both put Wakefield above Coventry!
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #12
Nick said:
Ay? I checked here http://www.ukcities.co.uk/populations/ and Wikipedia. Both put Wakefield above Coventry!
Click to expand...

'Wakefield' has been expanded for administrative purposes, but Wakefield is smaller than Rugby.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #13
Nick said:
Ay? I checked here http://www.ukcities.co.uk/populations/ and Wikipedia. Both put Wakefield above Coventry!
Click to expand...

Both are wrong. I hope our Wikipedia worshiping teacher doesn't teach geography.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #14
Deleted member 5849 said:
'Wakefield' has been expanded for administrative purposes, but Wakefield is smaller than Rugby.
Click to expand...

Ah, in which case I take it back.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #15
Here you go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Wakefield

Of course we could now start discussing what constitutes the 'Coventry Area' but...
 
P

play_in_skyblue_stripes

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #16
Nick said:
Ay? I checked here http://www.ukcities.co.uk/populations/ and Wikipedia. Both put Wakefield above Coventry!
Click to expand...

Wakefield is not bigger than Coventry. Wakefield is staunch RL anyway and most football people support Leeds.

The real worry I've always had is some kind of arrangement with Celtic or Rangers to gain access to English football.

However since SISU are so deeply unpopular on a national level now and lost all credibility. This wont happen now.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #17
Deleted member 5849 said:
Here you go:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Wakefield

Of course we could now start discussing what constitutes the 'Coventry Area' but...
Click to expand...

Still says:

Population (2011 est.)
• Total326,400


Coventry says:

Population (2011 ONS mid-year estimates)
• Total316,900 (Ranked 22nd)
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #18
So you're going to ignore the bit about it being combined for administrative purposes from a number of separate, distinct towns?

Which is, after all, what I said!
 
P

play_in_skyblue_stripes

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #19
Please can we stop this Wakefield nonsense.

What is currently still called Coventry City will NOT be moved to Wakefield. Its complete nonsense.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #20
Deleted member 5849 said:
So you're going to ignore the bit about it being combined for administrative purposes from a number of separate, distinct towns?

Which is, after all, what I said!
Click to expand...

Ah stop being correct. I just looked on the right! It is quite late you know!
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #21
play_in_skyblue_stripes said:
Please can we stop this Wakefield nonsense.

What is currently still called Coventry City will NOT be moved to Wakefield. Its complete nonsense.
Click to expand...


Who said it was? It was me trying to be clever and failing, badly!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?