You used the term "behavourial traits of the guest population"
That's not about having a different opinion. It's about you using terminology which is at best xenophobic.
If you want to be taken seriously and not called racist then stop using the language of racists. It's not hard.
Again, you've decided that my pointing out the differing societal attitudes that
can be part of the make up of elements of a non indigenous faction (See examples of 'Brits abroad', not necessarily the TV programme but personal experience) is based purely on racist views or at best, owing to a brief bout of fair mindedness on your part, the lesser charge of 'xenophobia'.
It's almost like you're imposing a form of censorship on the debate with your use of lazy labelling.
The reactions of some locals, in their extremity, was shocking. The need for some foreigners to indicate their nationalities by means of stickers on their doors/windows was genuinely saddening albeit probably a smart move in the short term.
The point I initially attempted to raise was concerning the volume of incidents (if at all) perpetrated by the communities of Non Northern Irish.
Was the alleged sexual assault the first incidence or had there been other issues prior and the latest was just a case of the straw breaking the camels back? I don't know. Maybe in the days to come more will be revealed.
It's fair to say that whilst rioting has been a 'go to' reaction in N.I. for nigh on sixty years, unless we're all happy to explain away the violence as being the result of a meth fuelled racist youth, there may just be the need for a little further inquiry?