Which will last til when? We won't have a team capable of getting back up and our crowds will drop to 10k, then how much do we start losing every month?
To be honest that statement form Hoff was a bit of anger and him letting off steam.
SISU have rumbled the hoff camp and the investors are not a happy bunch.
What have they rumbled exactly? I don't get it. The fact that Allardyce was part of the original company looking to buy the club and yet Hoffman has already clearly explained this and that he would have simply resigned his position?
Sounds more like Sisu or whoever throwing mud and hoping it will stick. In their best interests to make any bid look foolish to make them look the more viable option!
What have they rumbled exactly? I don't get it. The fact that Allardyce was part of the original company looking to buy the club and yet Hoffman has already clearly explained this and that he would have simply resigned his position?
Sounds more like Sisu or whoever throwing mud and hoping it will stick. In their best interests to make any bid look foolish to make them look the more viable option!
Think if anybody using the Allardyce link as an excuse then it is the Hoffman camp.
If Allardyce not a problem, then why have all his alleged investors pulled out?
If it's the privacy thing, we still don't know who they are about from Ken Bruce, so not much of an issue, and what do they have to hide anyway?
Anyway Hoffman and his backers will not deal directly with SISU or the current board now so the deal is dead.
I would not trade admin for Hoffman coming in.
Doesn't appear that way to me, Lord. Why would Hoffman's lot use the Allardyce link as an excuse? The suggestion is that Sisu or agents of Sisu (good name for a band) started to leak info of names involved when they agreed not to and to keep to a confidentiality agreement.
As I've said a dozen times or so, the Channel 4 documentary suggested that many, many football club owners were not known or clear and many were being kept secretive behind company names and groups that were hard to identify. Could well be there is some dodgy money involved in this and these people didn't wish their names splashed all over the press. The Ken Bruce thing was probably just the thin end of the wedge and who knows how much more would have been leaked and how many names would have been named.
Not good of course if some of them are a bit dodgy, but you have to ask the question, just who isn't dodgy in football these days?
Just had my fill with dodgy owners(past and present), would be nice to have some transparency for once, and not just to close our eyes and hope for the best Otis.
Not good of course if some of them are a bit dodgy, but you have to ask the question, just who isn't dodgy in football these days?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?