torchomatic
Well-Known Member
LOL. the irony in that post goes off the scale.
He's just a prick mate, would never have the bollocks to say anything towards fans other than on a keyboard, calling them twats e.c.t.
and that's why people need to use their loaves a little bit because this had deflected attention from a well organised, peaceful, legitimate protest that went on after the game.
Whether it affected the game or not it's proved divisive and has caused friction among the support, as if we needed any more reasons to be at each others throats.
sisu will be loving this.
I have no idea if you knew or not. You can't say things like that though Nick.
I have no idea about anything apart from you mentioning a knee op once I think?
I said "must having a hearing problem" for not hearing the whistle along with a wink as it was meant as in people strangely didn't hear it, the same as people say refs need glasses, the same as when people say "are you blind" when the ref misses something.
Are you really trying to play that card?
Still if we get people blaming fans for all our demises, it's all good, you'll get some likes and high fives....
Cock.
If it's the Sky Sports highlights, the footage of the second goal starts after the incident so it's not on the video.Even the highlights disprove your bollocks, so on that note..
Said it before on here and will say it again, I have no problem confronting anyone on here to discuss personally the stances I make by sticking up for fellow supporters. I've been to all protests, I've been to all meetings, it's funny that no-one calls each other names at these yet people do so on here, now that's fucking ironic Torch!LOL. the irony in that post goes off the scale.
No, it isn't a conspiracy theory. It is saying that most of the people in and around the protests didn't hear it or are straight up denying it happened.
Who has mentioned a conspiracy apart from you?
No not at all. Just asking for you to think before you post!
No not at all. Just asking for you to think before you post!
I have no idea about anything apart from you mentioning a knee op once I think?
I said "must having a hearing problem" for not hearing the whistle along with a wink as it was meant as in people strangely didn't hear it, the same as people say refs need glasses, the same as when people say "are you blind" when the ref misses something.
Are you really trying to play that card?
Oh dear, you of all people...Like skybluebeduff you mean?
Said it before on here and will say it again, I have no problem confronting anyone on here to discuss personally the stances I make by sticking up for fellow supporters. I've been to all protests, I've been to all meetings, it's funny that no-one calls each other names at these yet people do so on here, now that's fucking ironic Torch!
Fuck off u numpty! A hearing problem isn't a disability!! My hearing is fucked, doesn't mean I can park outside the door at tescos! I also heard the whistleWell isn't that nice. I have a disability and you choose to use it against me and say it's embarrassing. What is your policy on members of this forum who discriminate against other members in this way?
Whatever happened with the goal the whistles need to stop, it's just making other clubs turn on us and is doing nothing to help with the issues at hand
Wanderers boss Parkinson slams 'idiotic' Coventry City fans for whistle antics
That is fair enough Nick a lot of people may have heard a whistle (and it should not be happening and it is no form of protest with any value). But that in itself is not proof it affected the players.. The only ones who can say that are the players. It looked to me like they switched off and were wrong footed when the ball came back in. But again only the players can really tell us.
The important thing for me is the time for protest is before the game, half time and after the game. During the game support the players. I would ask all fans lets put the whistles to bed. It has been done, move on to something else. Why because it divides fans, not just Coventry fans but potentially turns other clubs against us. The protests are meant to increase awareness not loose us sympathy and support.
So instead of reading it like a chance to have real discussions without keyboards, you've taken it like it has to be a violent type of confrontation? are you for real?You know what, I have always had the feeling you'd be quite happy to confront people. You're obviously well 'ard.
I'm all for sticking up for fellow supporters but when their actions mean we lose points then I think they should be condemned by everyone. But no, it doesn't work that way apparently.
So instead of reading it like a chance to have real discussions without keyboards, you've taken it like it has to be a violent type of confrontation? are you for real?
I think he is. I reckon CJ knows yesterday was a bit of a fuck up. The whistles that led to their goal have taken the spotlight away from the sit-in, which should be the main focus. The protests (whether part of an official organisation or not) are starting to lose us points. A lot of fans aren't going to be happy with that.
Did you read the article? it clearly says the entire game, even mentioning the Sheff Utd game. But of course you never read it, the headline suits your agenda.I'm sure Beduff will let him know he was wrong.
If you think a keyboard and an anonymous ego is 'real', then good luck with that...I think I'm about as real as you are.
Did you read the article? it clearly says the entire game, even mentioning the Sheff Utd game. But of course you never read it, the headline suits your agenda.
I don't blame CJ for whistling, what is annoying is that it is somehow justified, played down or straight out ignored and denied.
The game before people were encouraged to whistle through the game, so it was carried on.
All it takes is to clearly condemn it, try their best to make sure fans don't act the same. I understand that if an individual does it it's down to them, but they also need to see they encouraged it last game and are now trying to make out as if nothing happened.
Did it say it affected his players that much that they conceded goals because of it and scored an equalizer because of it too?Yes, I did. It clearly states the whistles proved a distraction on the pitch. You've been saying it didn't affect what was happening on the pitch.
Did it say it affected his players that much that they conceded goals because of it and scored an equalizer because of it too?
No I asked you a question to see if Parkinson had said that. But you won't answer it. End of.Oh I see. So you've gone from it didn't affect the players to it might of but it didn't contribute to the goal. You're right obviously. Enough said.
No I asked you a question to see if Parkinson had said that. But you won't answer it. End of.
No I asked you a question to see if Parkinson had said that. But you won't answer it. End of.
Like skybluebeduff you mean?
If it happened, wouldn't he of mentioned it? He's already had a go about it, why not mention the effect it had? Because it never effected the result...So, Parkinson didn't mention it, so it didn't happen?
EDIT: Nick beat me to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?