Its corruption and lack of integrity. I knew we would get a penalty against us today and i will bet that was down to the fact we have embarrassed the FA on Sunday.I was just watching then, their defender all over Wright with the lino in line. As soon as wright grabbed his shirt back the lino was talking to the ref on his ear piece.
Something has to be done about the inconsistency.
Anyone got videos? All happened down the other end today
That was the first contact by lati
The law changed its serious injury not head injuryI’m more annoyed about the head injury, even if it wasn’t, if a player goes down with potential head injury these days the game should be stopped immediately.
When?The law changed its serious injury not head injury
You can, it wasn't a penAh then it’s probably a pen. Bugger. Thought I could continue my rants against officials.
I’m more annoyed about the head injury, even if it wasn’t, if a player goes down with potential head injury these days the game should be stopped immediately.
He invented a foul so their lad could get treated in the second half and there was clearly fk all wrong with him.The law changed its serious injury not head injury
Why should the ref think that? If the ref thinks that then he needs to be banned from reffing.The problem was Thomas put his hands to his head ran a bit then went down. I think ref thought he was just doing it to stop an attack. He ignored a few Hull players that lay on pitch like they had been shot.
Ref on Sunday ignored a few instances when Manchester United players lay on the pitch.
I'm all for it play on. It wasn't like he had been knocked out. I was pretty close to it and there didn't seem much in it to me.
Yeah i checked that and that is the FA guidance as wellNot the case. Serious injury or head injury.
In fact, it's gone more the other way with all the studies into head injuries. They are supposed to stop the game immediately.
View attachment 35351
No, where does it ay it has to be a serious head injury?We should have took Thomas off for a head injury assessment then?
So our medical staff are just as bad.
Thanks mateNot the case. Serious injury or head injury.
In fact, it's gone more the other way with all the studies into head injuries. They are supposed to stop the game immediately.
View attachment 35351
Who was their player who put that challenge on Kelly?It's the red card that's the issue.
You can argue the toss of the penalty but that foot is high and his stoods are showing. It's a very poor tackle. We need to wise up. If that was Kelly against a Hull player, they'd be on the floor rolling all over the place.
Wasn't it morton?Who was their player who put that challenge on Kelly?
I just saw the highlights it looks like for our 2 Nd goal the ball was out of play just before we scored .Thought the ref was OK last night. Let a lot of robust challenges go from us, which I like to see, even with Hull players rolling about on the deck milking it. Penalty was probably correct decision, if not borderline - still better than VAR spending 2 minutes deciding if the challenge was a cm one way or the other. Carded the Hull players for the unnecessary celebrations. We pretty much shot ourselves in the foot with 2 completely avoidable mistakes, and a poor attempt at a challenge on the edge of the area. We had to work a lot harder for our goals.
not all head injuries put you flat on your back, also where does it say in the laws that as well?tbf to the ref - Thomas didnt commit to going down, he was on his knee for a bit, then stood up, then saw them breaking and went back down again...
however annoying, it wasnt an injury that the game needed stopping for
Having said that, the ref was more than happy to stop the game for their antics more than once when none of them were remotely head injuries
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?