Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Hinckley Confirm Coventry Discussions (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Sub
  • Start date Dec 13, 2012
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 13, 2012
  • #36
Quality when i think the sisu muppets can't drag us any lower, they manage a corker !!!!
 

deanocity3

New Member
  • Dec 13, 2012
  • #37
Are u saying Joy Seppela is Ms Piggy
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Dec 13, 2012
  • #38
How much are the pitch fees at the Memorial Park?
 

BurbageSkyBlues

New Member
  • Dec 13, 2012
  • #39
Pathetic!

Nothing else to say
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 13, 2012
  • #40
covmartin said:
I've just listened to the Hinckley Chairman being interviewed on Radio Leicester. I'll try to give a summary of what was said.
At the end of last week the Hinckley Chairman invited Fisher to a reserve game. He asked Fisher how our reserve team were getting on (in terms of where they are playing) and Fisher's response was "We're not doing too good on the first team front".
The Hinckley chairman said he saw an opportunity to raise the ground share subject after this comment.
He said that Hinckley have made an offer to ground share with Coventry. He claims league rules only require them to appease season ticket holders (6,500) and they could do that easily by putting in temporary stands to bring seated capacity up to the required number.
He was really trying to sell the idea of this and said they would be a better option than Nene Park. It would also be a lifeline for Hinckley football club.
There was no clue given as to Coventry's response but my feeling from the interview is that this story seems to be coming from the Hinckley end. They would love this to happen to solve their own financial problems.
Click to expand...

sky blue john said:
Quality when i think the sisu muppets can't drag us any lower, they manage a corker !!!!
Click to expand...

BurbageSkyBlues said:
Pathetic!

Nothing else to say
Click to expand...

This one you can't blame on Fisher or sisu ...
 
G

glamour76

Active Member
  • Dec 13, 2012
  • #41
I completely agree. What would you have sisu do? Carry on paying £1million a year, with no concessions? Our club will die. Agree to £400,000 rent a year with half of the concessions? Our club will die. We need a fair rent with full concessions. Lets not kid ourselves, CCFC will come through this, with or without the help of ACL. As proved with talks with rushden & also Hinckley.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 13, 2012
  • #42
Godiva said:
This one you can't blame on Fisher or sisu ...
Click to expand...

Will not stop the one eyed ones from doing so though.

Probably his fault the M6 was shut yesterday and all of Coventry became gridlocked.
 
P

procdoc

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #43
glamour76 said:
I completely agree. What would you have sisu do? Carry on paying £1million a year, with no concessions? Our club will die. Agree to £400,000 rent a year with half of the concessions? Our club will die. We need a fair rent with full concessions. Lets not kid ourselves, CCFC will come through this, with or without the help of ACL. As proved with talks with rushden & also Hinckley.
Click to expand...

They offered full concessions on match day. Anyone who thinks sisu is being hard done by is an idiot
 
G

glamour76

Active Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #44
procdoc said:
They offered full concessions on match day. Anyone who thinks sisu is being hard done by is an idiot
Click to expand...
Anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot. Brilliant
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #45
If SISU move CCFC to Hinckley/Rushden/Northampton, All of you ST holders should demand your money back, because none of these grounds will have the capacity to take you all AND pay at the gate supporters, both home and away. Glamour76, what makes your post more substantiated than that of Procdoc? We've all got opinions. Remember, by lack of investment is the reason we are where we are, and we have SISU and nobody else to thank for that. :facepalm:
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #46
Sky Blue Kid said:
If SISU move CCFC to Hinckley/Rushden/Northampton, All of you ST holders should demand your money back, because none of these grounds will have the capacity to take you all AND pay at the gate supporters, both home and away. Glamour76, what makes your post more substantiated than that of Procdoc? We've all got opinions. Remember, by lack of investment is the reason we are where we are, and we have SISU and nobody else to thank for that. :facepalm:
Click to expand...

We have all the owners of the club since relegation to thank for no investment.
 

@richh87

Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #47
Grendel said:
We have all the owners of the club since relegation to thank for no investment.
Click to expand...

True, but SISU haven't exactly made things better - and it's their fault we were relegated to this league.

I say we take Hinckley up on the offer. It would be great financially - and playing in a packed, tight ground would be better for the team than the empty expensive Ricoh.
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #48
@ Gendel..

All the old "Chestnuts" coming out now. Think back to the raping of Cov City fc. by SISU on take over by said company. "We are going to invest £20m straight away and take this football club forward back to the Premier league" (Famous last words of Ray Ranson):facepalm:
The magic words spoken...(invest £20m straight away and take this football club forward)...No, no SISU...Thats reverse gear!:thinking about:
 
S

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #49
Hinckley is a tight little ground, have good facilities and the pitch looks in good condition. If they built a temp stand over the open end above the all weather pitches they could get capacity up to around 7k.
They were in financial trouble but thats getting sorted out by a chairman who actually cares about his football club.
The Ground share would save two clubs even if only on a temp basis, we could even use there first team as a feeder for our club.

I think the whole idea is only if ACL lock the City out which I do not think will actually happen.
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #50
Sky Blue Kid said:
@ Gendel..

All the old "Chestnuts" coming out now. Think back to the raping of Cov City fc. by SISU on take over by said company. "We are going to invest £20m straight away and take this football club forward back to the Premier league" (Famous last words of Ray Ranson):facepalm:
The magic words spoken...(invest £20m straight away and take this football club forward)...No, no SISU...Thats reverse gear!:thinking about:
Click to expand...

They have so far injected £40m+ into the club. How much more is needed to call it 'investment'?

You should read this piece (although more than a year old it is kept as 'sticky' for a reason): http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/11316-FAQ-2-Money-Talks
 

DazzleTommyDazzle

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #51
Godiva said:
They have so far injected £40m+ into the club. How much more is needed to call it 'investment'?
Click to expand...

In my view for it to be called "investment", money has not only to be put in - but has to be used in an intelligent way.

They "invested" money last year to plug losses. They tried to reduce these losses by arbitrarily cutting costs, with the result that we were relegated, so cutting our revenue by much more than they had "saved".

On your measure they "invested" last year. On mine they didn't.
 
D

Deleted member 4232

Guest
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #52
DazzleTommyDazzle said:
In my view for it to be called "investment", money has not only to be put in - but has to be used in an intelligent way.

They "invested" money last year to plug losses. They tried to reduce these losses by arbitrarily cutting costs, with the result that we were relegated, so cutting our revenue by much more than they had "saved".

On your measure they "invested" last year. On mine they didn't.
Click to expand...

By definition, they invested. They've just not invested intelligently. But let's not squabble over words. Point is, we're in a mess.
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #53
@ Godiva...

Please read carefully the first"Quote".. "We are going to invest £20m straight away and take this football club forward back to the Premier league" (Famous last words of Ray Ranson)
That quote was made on takeover of Cov.....What was the first thing SISU did?.....Sell Scott Dann, and Danny Fox?!?!?
A "No Brainer" from where I'm sitting.
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #54
Sky Blue Kid said:
@ Godiva...

Please read carefully the first"Quote".. "We are going to invest £20m straight away and take this football club forward back to the Premier league" (Famous last words of Ray Ranson)
That quote was made on takeover of Cov.....What was the first thing SISU did?.....Sell Scott Dann, and Danny Fox?!?!?
A "No Brainer" from where I'm sitting.
Click to expand...

Well, that is not an accurate quote. Read here: http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/11334-FAQ-3-The-End

Selling Dann and Fox happened in June and July 2009 ... 2½ years after sisu took over the club.

Did you say 'no brainer'?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #55
Sky Blue Kid said:
@ Godiva...

Please read carefully the first"Quote".. "We are going to invest £20m straight away and take this football club forward back to the Premier league" (Famous last words of Ray Ranson)
That quote was made on takeover of Cov.....What was the first thing SISU did?.....Sell Scott Dann, and Danny Fox?!?!?
A "No Brainer" from where I'm sitting.
Click to expand...

They were in fact signed within months of SISU's arrival.
 
C

cyril

New Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #56
Brighton Sky Blue said:
They were in fact signed within months of SISU's arrival.
Click to expand...

Days even lol
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #57
cyril said:
Days even lol
Click to expand...

Hmmm SISU arrived in November, those players in January
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #58
SISU arrived in DECEMBER and Dann and Fox arrived in January for "peanuts" Between this happening and Them being sold....."On 11 February 2008, Dowie was released from his contract as Coventry manager,[18] which was officially cited as being due to significant differences of opinion between the management team and the Board as to how the club should be going forward.[19]"
This screams out to me that SISU were NOT going to invest in playing staff. What do you all think?:facepalm:
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #59
I've got to get this in quickly....Grendel are you there?......Dann and Fox were bought for an "undisclosed" amount (Some thought around 100k each) although Grendel may say with his "estimated guess" that it was millions(Joke)
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #60
Sky Blue Kid said:
I've got to get this in quickly....Grendel are you there?......Dann and Fox were bought for an "undisclosed" amount (Some thought around 100k each) although Grendel may say with his "estimated guess" that it was millions(Joke)
Click to expand...

Google and wikipeedia are your friends:

Scott Dann (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Dann)
undisclosed fee, suggested in the media to be "in excess of £1,000,000
 
Last edited: Dec 14, 2012

skyblueman

New Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #61
Sorry if I being a bit thick here but what's the point of all this anyway?

Surely CCFC are committed to renting the Ricoh anyway so why bother saying you'll go somewhere else - ACL can still come after the club for the future rent

Any idea when the contract ends or is there a get-out clause in it somewhere????
 
Last edited: Dec 14, 2012
C

chem90

New Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #62
FAO any poster who sees moving to a smaller ground i.e. Rushden and Diamonds, Hinckley, etc as a feasible alternative are simply narrow minded. Have you thought of the bigger picture - promotion. The bandwagon fans will be back plus others pushing attendances into 13,000-15,000. So where these grounds are efficient for 1st round JPT games and midweek matches against Hartlepool, they will deprive us of gate money in bigger games. IMO the solitary route to take in all this is stay at the Ricoh and get the deal done. Moving is not an option.
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #63
Everybody hears different stories, the one I heard was £100k each, but then it was "Undisclosed" as is ALL SISU dealings
 
A

Ashdown1

New Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #64
Steve.B50 said:
Hinckley is a tight little ground, have good facilities and the pitch looks in good condition. If they built a temp stand over the open end above the all weather pitches they could get capacity up to around 7k.
They were in financial trouble but thats getting sorted out by a chairman who actually cares about his football club.
The Ground share would save two clubs even if only on a temp basis, we could even use there first team as a feeder for our club.

I think the whole idea is only if ACL lock the City out which I do not think will actually happen.
Click to expand...

Their first team as a feeder club...............their first team have been hammered in all but about one game all season, take a look at their league stats. This is all pie in the sky, the local Hinckley Leicester fans are laughing their tits off at us over this. SISU are dragging us through yet more shame and ridicule.
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #65
skyblueman said:
Sorry if I being a bit thick here but what's the point of all this anyway?

Surely CCFC are committed to renting the Ricoh anyway so why bother saying you'll go somewhere else - ACL can still come after the club for the future rent

Any idea when the contract ends????
Click to expand...

If no agreement is made with ACL, then the only option for the club is to declare insolvency, go into administration, reconstruct and move to another stadium. As sisu via ARVO has secured all assets, ACL will have nowhere to turn to regain the outstanding rent - neither the already owed nor the future (remaining of the contract). ACL will also face considerable loss going forward, and the possibility Yorkshire bank call in their loans.

The club will be deducted at least 10 points and relegation to league 2 is not unthinkable. The fan base will decrease even more and at the end of the transition, even Hinckly Park may look oversized for CCFC ver 2.0.

As nobody win anything in that situation, I can't imagine it will ever come to that.
 
H

Hugh Jarse

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #66
I was born and bred in Coventry, I'm f*cked if I'm going to support CCFC playing in Hinckley, Nuneaton or anywhere else that isn't in Coventry.

Tin hat ready for any flak, bring it on.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #67
Godiva said:
If no agreement is made with ACL, then the only option for the club is to declare insolvency, go into administration, reconstruct and move to another stadium. As sisu via ARVO has secured all assets, ACL will have nowhere to turn to regain the outstanding rent - neither the already owed nor the future (remaining of the contract). ACL will also face considerable loss going forward, and the possibility Yorkshire bank call in their loans.

The club will be deducted at least 10 points and relegation to league 2 is not unthinkable. The fan base will decrease even more and at the end of the transition, even Hinckly Park may look oversized for CCFC ver 2.0.

See where you're coming from Godiva ,but surely if they declare insolvent ,go to Admin they may get rid of the lease in CCFC ,but will lose player registration ,League registration and the name Coventry City.
Click to expand...
 

Diehard Si

New Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #68
Through my line of work I met someone today that was consulted regarding the legal action ACL filed against City. He wouldn't give any details away, but when I suggested it was just a posturing gesture he just replied " I wouldn't be too sure about that, they hate each other".
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #69
Diehard Si said:
Through my line of work I met someone today that was consulted regarding the legal action ACL filed against City. He wouldn't give any details away, but when I suggested it was just a posturing gesture he just replied " I wouldn't be too sure about that, they hate each other".
Click to expand...

Of course they do ... they're each putting the other out of business.
But in reality it was always going to be. ACL's business model rely heavily on the £1m+ rent from the football club. They simply have to come up with an improved model and stay profitable even without ccfc as tenant.
Oh, and if they do .... there's the key to keep both alive (if ACL can live without ccfc, then surely they can live with ccfc paying £200k/yr rent).

But if they can't - and that is probably being investigated by Yorkshire bank/Deloitte - then the sensible thing will be to make sure ccfc doesn't have to go down with them.
 

TheParsonsHose

Member
  • Dec 14, 2012
  • #70
Jack Griffin said:


Ha ha what a joke..
Click to expand...

People have been going on about bringing back standing for a while though.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?