What fantastically warped logic!Hillary is opposed to gay marriage as well. And, Trump's banning muslim migration policy is the best thing possible for gays.
Hillary is opposed to gay marriage as well. And, Trump's banning muslim migration policy is the best thing possible for gays.
And the French National Front.
Seems the right are very happy to have someone with racist views and intolerance to gays in charge.
what's that go to do with it? Hilary wasn't elected so has no relevance to your point.
On the flip, the left are happy to have a warmongering, lying, cheating, killer who also undermines the rights of minorities and vulnerable people just as long as what they're saying is not offensive.
Come on Otis, you're better than that.
On the flip, the left are happy to have a warmongering, lying, cheating, killer who also undermines the rights of minorities and vulnerable people just as long as what they're saying is not offensive.
Come on Otis, you're better than that.
Try reading your own post. You tried to make out that Trumps victory and Brexit were nothing to do with the far left or right. The KKKs endorsement of Trump contradicts that.No, you tried to infer that it was indeed right wingers (such as the kkk) that had a generous influence on the election.
I pointed out Hillary was also endorsed by the KKK and now you're back tracking.
You're showing your true colours now. Why didn't you get straight to it without going through the charade of trying to make a constructive point in post 194. You'd have saved yourself a lot of time.
I think both Brexit and the Trump victory have signalled that people are fed up with mainstream politics... Or at least what they perceive it is.
I don't know how many of you have even lived and worked in America? I've spent 15 years in the States in business and know the country well. I suffered at having 'illegals' working in my kitchens on false documentation. I've raised my kids through school there and been 'an American'. You have to live there as one of them before you can truly appreciate what being American is with it's heavily protected constitution, the religious diversity, race and history. Most of you here are pretty ignorant that is clear. There were two candidates neither perfect. The Republicans won the house and senate majorities thanks to Trump.
The negative sensationalism on here regarding Trump is not the feeling over there. Both candidates are viewed with equal skepticism. Sure there is division but that is always the case. Change to the long held establishment has been the driving force to Trump's win. This guy is very bright and has played a brilliant election strategy.
I'd say it's different nowadays.
I'd imagine all you would know years ago was what you read in the newspaper you got. Nowadays with social media kids are mad for it, when I was at school if somebody mentioned politics and took the conversation away from football or pogs they would probably be disowned.
Try reading your own post. You tried to make out that Trumps victory and Brexit were nothing to do with the far left or right. The KKKs endorsement of Trump contradicts that.
Whoever endorsed remain in the EU vote or Clinton is irrelevant to your point because they didn't win. Your point concerned the winners of those two particular votes.
I think both Brexit and the Trump victory have signalled that people are fed up with mainstream politics... Or at least what they perceive it is.
On the flip, the left are happy to have a warmongering, lying, cheating, killer who also undermines the rights of minorities and vulnerable people just as long as what they're saying is not offensive.
I think both Brexit and the Trump victory have signalled that people are fed up with mainstream politics... Or at least what they perceive it is.
I've really hit a nerve with you haven't I?
The extreme right and left picked their sides from day one. For example in Brexit the hateful racists wanted leave and he wet blanket liberals wanted remain. The people in the middle were ultimately the ones that swayed the swayed the votes.
The extreme right KKK may well have primarily endorsed Trump, but there was just as many intolerant left wing social justice warriors pulling the votes the other way. The middle 50% were the ones that made it count, and they're the ones people like you cannot accept. I mean, how dare they disagree with you?
Someone is showing their true colours.
The only person you've hit a nerve with is yourself you mad fucker.
You've just pretty much contradicted your original post, I told you, go and have a lie down.
As for me not accepting the middle 50%, I have no idea what you're on about, though to be fair I don't think you do.
Trump spent over a billion dollars. So how much did Clinton spend if he only spent a fraction of it?If it wasn't rigged, he'd have won by an even bigger margin. The Clintons spent untold millions on their campaign, Trump spent just a fraction of that.
Not always. It's left to individual states to decide if all the votes go to one candidate.Also the fact that a states votes all go to the winner even if the percentage vote is almost identical. You would think some proportional distribution would be the sensible thing.
I haven't presented an opinion to challenge me on, I merely contradicted something you said in your original post.No, you are trying to mud the waters because you've had someone actually challenge you and you don't like it.
The middle 50% is the bit in between the far right and far left, but you already knew that. Believe it or not, some normal people did vote to leave the EU, and also did vote for Trump.
Apparently Clinton spent $1.4bn and Trump spent around half that. That was the consensus last night on the BBC panel.Trump spent over a billion dollars. So how much did Clinton spend if he only spent a fraction of it?
$1.4bn, Jesus.
I haven't presented an opinion to challenge me on, I merely contradicted something you said in your original post.
I didn't even say you were wrong I said it contradicted you slightly.
What can't you grasp about that?
Not always. It's left to individual states to decide if all the votes go to one candidate.
we could get into the top half of the championship with that budget!
And spend the rest on JR4 JR5 JR6 JR7 AND JR8.Unlikely, sisu would buy Messi's sister by accident and then blow the rest of the budget on an ice rink at the Butts.
I just get the impression from you that you're extremely one sided on this (as per brexit) and unable to really take others points on board without shooting them down. It does just seem excessive overall, but reading your last comment, I don't think you really realise you're doing it.
If that's not your intention then fair enough.
Forgive my ignorance but how does that work with a vote so close?
Trump was just over 1 billion and Clinton 2 billion overall.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?