Nick
Administrator
It does sound like he has a good idea already doesn't it?
That insinuates it could be thrown out. Is that how I should be reading this?
Surely what we should all want is for the truth to come out? I don't get all this wanting Higgs to win or sisu to win nonsense. I want to know what has been happening at my football club.
My problem is that everyone states that if Sisu win this will be the case. Not necessarily so. Would much rather see the evidence before forming an opinion.
Its all about motives.
That statement doesn't say their motive for lending the money was to force a club sale, it just says what might be an outcome of it.
For the council to lend the money with the intention of getting rid of sisu is illegal.
For the council to lend money that might have a knock on effect to sisu isn't illegal.
For the council to have a preferred owner of the football club isn't illegal.
Can a decision be made without all of the evidence? What happens if one side has a deal breaking bit of evidence?
Can a decision be made without all of the evidence? What happens if one side has a deal breaking bit of evidence?
Then they probably shouldn't have mentioned that before now!
In a perfect world we'd all love that. In the real world it would depend how you went about it. Guess that is what the JR is to decide.
What if they haven't had chance? I'm not saying they have,.just asking how it works
@TheSimonGilbert: Sisu QC agrees there's a 'tit for tat element' to this case. Judge points out Higgs is limited at £29k but "sky is the limit" for Sisu
Can a decision be made without all of the evidence? What happens if one side has a deal breaking bit of evidence?
@TheSimonGilbert: Sisu QC agrees there's a 'tit for tat element' to this case. Judge points out Higgs is limited at £29k but "sky is the limit" for Sisu
Both sides have had to lay out the basis of their arguement over the last few hours. If you had something that was going to blow the whole case out of the water you'd mention it as early as possible so you could get it all over and done with.
@TheSimonGilbert: Sisu QC agrees there's a 'tit for tat element' to this case. Judge points out Higgs is limited at £29k but "sky is the limit" for Sisu
@TheSimonGilbert: Sisu QC agrees there's a 'tit for tat element' to this case. Judge points out Higgs is limited at £29k but "sky is the limit" for Sisu
All about implied terms of an agreement in contract law. Very deep legal stuff ATM
They keep referring to a case called Belize. The Breaking Bad fan in me finds this amusing
They keep referring to a case called Belize. The Breaking Bad fan in me finds this amusing
Btw, case won't be thrown out. Judge ruling on if he can decide now based on preliminary arguments only with no witnesses
We find out if it ends today or goes on all week
Precedent from a previous case.
Are we just talking about the Sisu counter case, or the primary Higgs case- or both?
Yes. Lots of legal people passing things around and rummaging thru files.
I can see the mythical 4000+ pages of emails
If they win the sky we could be in business with the new stadium location confirmation......Is that the most Higgs can win is 29k or lose? Same for SISU, they can win "the sky" or lose "the sky"?
Are we just talking about the Sisu counter case, or the primary Higgs case- or both?
I can see the mythical 4000+ pages of emails
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?