Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
There is over 65 concessions.
There is over 65 concessions.Yes he did. Abolished the over 60’s concession…B’stard. It was flagged up on here by his foot soldiers. Only asking for opinions of course.
Why the poo emoji then? Explain yourself . Just because you can ?I am 27 and own a house on my own.
Im a chartered accountant on a good wage. I'm doing alright thanks Chris
And precisely where have I done that ? Will be interested to see your non existent evidence .He's another who just completely vilifies anyone with youth still. Perhaps hes jealous some still have theirs.
The condescending language calling Samuel Sunshine.And precisely where have I done that ? Will be interested to see your non existent evidence .
Is that it ? Some deep inference there Sparkes to attempt a tenuous defence of your argument. Now find some proper evidence.The condescending language calling Samuel Sunshine.
I'd say the fact you instantly assumed that I 1) had no money and 2) hadn't worked hard is also proof.Is that it ? Some deep inference there Sparkes to attempt a tenuous defence of your argument. Now find some proper evidence.
I'd say the fact you instantly assumed that I 1) had no money and 2) hadn't worked hard is also proof.
A reaction to the ridiculous poo emoji and you know it. Why else would you reply in that manner to my original point ?I'd say the fact you instantly assumed that I 1) had no money and 2) hadn't worked hard is also proof.
Yes Grendel I'm sure you have never used the laughing or poo emoji towards a comment aimed towards you.He was referencing your childish use of an emoji to a comment that wasn't even aimed at you
The idea that young people don't work hard or want to save is nonsense.
Young at heart clint.Can't believe us youngsters get so vilified
Hahaha, for a second I still think i'm included but then remember I've probably now entered my middle-aged years.Can't believe us youngsters get so vilified
Hahaha, for a second I still think i'm included but then remember I've probably now entered my middle-aged years.
Careful using the word childish in this context. Goodness knows what he may infer from that.He was referencing your childish use of an emoji to a comment that wasn't even aimed at you
You weren’t here when they increased it from 60-65 a couple of years ago?There is over 65 concessions.
Great answer full of factsWrong.
Really ?Facts have a well know left wing bias it’s true.
Really ?
more like jealousy and envy if you cant have it then neither should I you mean. Wait until you are all over 60 is all I will say because thats guaranteed
It's not jealousy when it's trueOh yeah the good old left wing jealousy politics that the elderly are wealthy
Have you considered people in their early 60's still working on low incomes in your analysis ?Again I'll add I have no issue with discount for people at retirement age living off a pension that's fine.
People in their early 60s still working really don't need it.
Nothing to be jealous about if you are using yourself as a fine example of the younger generationHe's another who just completely vilifies anyone with youth still. Perhaps hes jealous some still have theirs.
Going back to an old post, after the conversation has died down to make a personal attack. No wonder you come across as a little jealous.Nothing to be jealous about if you are using yourself as a fine example of the younger generation
Only following your fine lead. Yet again your comment is an inference made by yourself with no factual basisGoing back to an old post, after the conversation has died down to make a personal attack. No wonder you come across as a little jealous.
You came back to reply again to a post you'd already replied to 3 hours ago. Im living in your head rent free.Only following your fine lead. Yet again your comment is an inference made by yourself with no factual basis
It it makes you feel better to have that opinion then I'm very pleased for you. Must be difficult trying to manage an ego of that enormity. Well done.You came back to reply again to a post you'd already replied to 3 hours ago. Im living in your head rent free.
Again I'll add I have no issue with discount for people at retirement age living off a pension that's fine.
People in their early 60s still working really don't need it.
Would that not apply to anyone of working age on a low income? Not sure the ticket office is going to be able to cope with a sliding scale of ticket prices and having to means test everyone!Have you considered people in their early 60's still working on low incomes in your analysis ?
I highlighted this because the original comment made by this poster was aimed purely at those over 60 but under retirement age.Would that not apply to anyone of working age on a low income? Not sure the ticket office is going to be able to cope with a sliding scale of ticket prices and having to means test everyone!
Check my comment history, I am not normally a histrionics or reactionary type of poster. The title of the thread was on the proviso that he was indeed abandoning consession pricing for 16yos, which in my view would have been a shambles.
Are there people under 60 on a low a wage as well?No one working in their early 60’s is on a low wage?
Does that include those that have retired early, just for argument's sake at 63?I think pensioner's should get in for free.
After all most have paid to watch shit for 50 years.
AbsolutelyDoes that include those that have retired early, just for argument's sake at 63?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?