D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I find i slightly odd that it's automatically assumed a conclusion of talks that sees SISU obtaining ownership of the stadium in some way, shape or form is seen as bad.
Surely that suggests a lack of confidence in Ann Lucas?
Why can't a successful conclusion to talks be because both 'sides' have seen a way to resolution?
And if we accept that at least one of the 'sides' is taking a stand for the benefit of the football club, wouldn't resolution be because it's of benefit to the football club?
Surely that suggests a lack of confidence in Ann Lucas?
Why can't a successful conclusion to talks be because both 'sides' have seen a way to resolution?
And if we accept that at least one of the 'sides' is taking a stand for the benefit of the football club, wouldn't resolution be because it's of benefit to the football club?