8-10If Gus did go… how much do you think we’d get for him?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Eleventy billion.If Gus did go… how much do you think we’d get for him?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
7ish at a guess. His red cards at the start of the season will still weigh on his price a bit. Next year easily double.If Gus did go… how much do you think we’d get for him?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If Gus did go… how much do you think we’d get for him?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A year to go on his contract? £5-6 million.
I suspect some clubs are put off by his temperament
Nonsense. The cards will have no effect on his price whatsoever. Name another player whose transfer fee has been determined by his disciplinary record.7ish at a guess. His red cards at the start of the season will still weigh on his price a bit. Next year easily double.
I fear it won’t work that way. Look at Gyokeres. Cov allegedly demanded £25 million for him but that price is dropping, possibly to under £20 million.A lot is made of us allowing a £20m player to leave on a free in Vik but if we had a bid of £5/6m for Hamer, I'd happily allow him to leave for free next season.
I'd want £10m before allowing Hamer to go. We'd need to spend millions for replace him and wouldn't likely get a player that good.
David SpeedieNonsense. The cards will have no effect on his price whatsoever. Name another player whose transfer fee has been determined by his disciplinary record.
You’re just naming a player who didn’t have a great disciplinary record. Where’s the evidence that he would have cost us more than £780,000 if he hardly got booked?David Speedie
You only get £25m for proper players like Alex Scott IMO. Agreed?I fear it won’t work that way. Look at Gyokeres. Cov allegedly demanded £25 million for him but that price is dropping, possibly to under £20 million.
Hanging on to players for their last season runs the risk of them not fully committing to the cause. There is no way Cov will try to hang on to Gyokeres. The club just can’t afford to miss out on that sort of money. I think the same applies to any bid for Hamer.
No, I am naming a player who Liverpool signed from Cov at a reduced fee because of his disciplinary record and relative age.You’re just naming a player who didn’t have a great disciplinary record. Where’s the evidence that he would have cost us more than £780,000 if he hardly got booked?
You really think the price was affected by his disciplinary record? More than that, you are stating it as a fact.No, I am naming a player who Liverpool signed from Cov at a reduced fee because of his disciplinary record and relative age.
Mark DennisNonsense. The cards will have no effect on his price whatsoever. Name another player whose transfer fee has been determined by his disciplinary record.
I probably wouldn’t state it, unless I was certain it was a factYou really think the price was affected by his disciplinary record? More than that, you are stating it as a fact.
I fear it won’t work that way. Look at Gyokeres. Cov allegedly demanded £25 million for him but that price is dropping, possibly to under £20 million.
Hanging on to players for their last season runs the risk of them not fully committing to the cause. There is no way Cov will try to hang on to Gyokeres. The club just can’t afford to miss out on that sort of money. I think the same applies to any bid for Hamer.
Oh yes and one thing I am certain of, is that Rangers FC decided not to bid for Hamer because they decided his discipline wasnt suited to the Scottish league, particularly against Celtic.You really think the price was affected by his disciplinary record? More than that, you are stating it as a fact.
Yeah that’s a good point. But Diaz was content to stay. Gyokeres wants to leave. Doug King just made it slightly more complex with an ill-advised criticism of the player in the open pressThe big comparison is Brereton Diaz. Arguably he declined last season but nearly pushed Blackburn to the play offs and had 18 goals/assist. They could have had £20m last season and let him go for free.
Yeah that’s a good point. But Diaz was content to stay. Gyokeres wants to leave. Doug King just made it slightly more complex with an ill-advised criticism of the player in the open press
He is clearly very aspirational, but that's what the talks are supposedly. Doug will be telling him we've sold more season tickets than ever and want the play offs.
The big comparison is Brereton Diaz. Arguably he declined last season but nearly pushed Blackburn to the play offs and had 18 goals/assist. They could have had £20m last season and let him go for free.
A year to go on his contract? £5-6 million.
I suspect some clubs are put off by his temperament
There is zero point me naming another player because unless someone has specifically said it in the media (why would they...) it would be a consideration behind closed doors. Disciplinary record is something that would be taken in to account. Obviously he has done a fantastic job over the 2nd half of the season stopping the cards. I think another half a season those question marks dissappear. The reason I said next season double goes way beyond that if he continues ripping up the championship as he did 2nd half of the season it will prove he can maintain that level of performance as well as have a great Disciplinary record. Do you disagree with the 7m BTW?Nonsense. The cards will have no effect on his price whatsoever. Name another player whose transfer fee has been determined by his disciplinary record.
We did have Strachan in charge though.
Don't get me wrong, it's a massive task to replace them, but we are a level lower, and our money would in theory go further in this division, along with having a half-competent manager!
What we're never going to do is be consistently successful as long as we rely on a couple of players maintaining top form with a cast of loanees who then bog off elsewhere the next season.
I think £7m is cheap for Hamer when Bristol City want £25m for Scott.There is zero point me naming another player because unless someone has specifically said it in the media (why would they...) it would be a consideration behind closed doors. Disciplinary record is something that would be taken in to account. Obviously he has done a fantastic job over the 2nd half of the season stopping the cards. I think another half a season those question marks dissappear. The reason I said next season double goes way beyond that if he continues ripping up the championship as he did 2nd half of the season it will prove he can maintain that level of performance as well as have a great Disciplinary record. Do you disagree with the 7m BTW?
I agree contract length is a part so is consistency etc etc. I'd love £25m for Hamer but if we are considering if Gyok is worth that or not and strikers generally go for more cash I just can't see it getting above £10m.I think £7m is cheap for Hamer when Bristol City want £25m for Scott.
I agree however that Hamer stepped up another level when he was pushed further forward in the second half of the season.
Central midfield players who can be as impactful as Hamer in the final third normally command a premium.
I believe his contract length will impact his price far more than his early season cards.
Cov?I fear it won’t work that way. Look at Gyokeres. Cov allegedly demanded £25 million for him but that price is dropping, possibly to under £20 million.
Hanging on to players for their last season runs the risk of them not fully committing to the cause. There is no way Cov will try to hang on to Gyokeres. The club just can’t afford to miss out on that sort of money. I think the same applies to any bid for Hamer.
I think the key difference here, and I could be completely wrong, but there seems to be at least a desire from Hamer to stay, Vik not so much.
Ahhh yes if he leaves it’ll all be the club’s fault. Weren’t you claiming a couple of days ago that he’d already signed a 2 year deal with us?Yes that’s it. Hamer wants to stay and play for us. It will be pretty gutting if Hamer moves just because we couldn’t agree a new contract with him. He’s one of the best in this league and should be compensated fairly for that.
Didn’t seem to do Morelos any harm in his 6 years with them!Oh yes and one thing I am certain of, is that Rangers FC decided not to bid for Hamer because they decided his discipline wasnt suited to the Scottish league, particularly against Celtic.
Sometimes I use Cov as an abbreviation for Coventry, it’s pretty random of me but that’s the way I rockCov?
Perhaps reinforces the point. Rangers couldn’t have Morelos and Hamer in the starting XI…….because it would be a finishing IXDidn’t seem to do Morelos any harm in his 6 years with them!
nice tryLooks like you are badly wrong. And not for the first time, methinks
Successful trynice try
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?