Hamer deal details (3 Viewers)

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
Couple of things…

Have Sheff U paid us the full £15m transfer fee for Gus?

Also, any idea on his sell on fee?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
10 percent saddlebrains said

Of overall fee

So let's hope a prem club oi is him up for at least same amount we sold him for.

1.5m could come on very handy indeed
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
Couple of things…

Have Sheff U paid us the full £15m transfer fee for Gus?

Also, any idea on his sell on fee?
Seen lots of people say it was nowhere near 15mil
Also seen people claim they haven't paid all of money to date (payment in installments which is common in transfers I believe?)
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
They must be wedged up?

They got promoted, spent fuck all. They have now just been, or will be paid handsomely for failure? And they'll probably sell him for at least what they bought him for!

Gimme the money you red and white stripey slags!
Remember, they are starting on -2 as they still haven't paid for a load of players that they signed on their promotion winning season last year!
Cheated their way the the millions of the Premier League.
Nowhere near on the scale of Leicester though!!
 

blunted

Well-Known Member
Is it 10% of the fee or 10% of any money above what we sold him for, like Vik apparently?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
The whole thing about instalments is not really relevant as any players we sign will also be paid for in instalments
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
The whole thing about instalments is not really relevant as any players we sign will also be paid for in instalments
I don’t like the idea of someone paying instalments for a player who is no longer contracted to them. Sounds really iffy.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
I don’t like the idea of someone paying instalments for a player who is no longer contracted to them. Sounds really iffy.

Common practice and they are regulated by the football authorities. So if a team defaults they can be stopped from signing players in the future until it is rectified.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Common practice and they are regulated by the football authorities. So if a team defaults they can be stopped from signing players in the future until it is rectified.
That may be the case, but stopping, say, Sheffield Utd from signing players doesn‘t get us the money owed.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
That may be the case, but stopping, say, Sheffield Utd from signing players doesn‘t get us the money owed.
Oh it does because they can't sign anyone until they do. Unless of course they go bump but that's the case with any business.

As I said it is common practice (amongst all clubs world wide).
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Oh it does because they can't sign anyone until they do. Unless of course they go bump but that's the case with any business.

As I said it is common practice (amongst all clubs world wide).
What if they don’t want to sign anyone?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
What if they don’t want to sign anyone?

What forever? How would that work?
Look at Cardiff, refused to pay for their record signing who died in the plane crash. Ordered to pay. Contested it, put on a transfer embargo. Contested it, lost in court and ordered that they have to pay as transfer was completed.

A club could not exist at a professional level without being part of the transfer system. Also remember they will have transfer fees coming in from other clubs in installments that they can be prevented from receiving and the money diverted to the club owed.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
g What forever? How would that work?
Look at Cardiff, refused to pay for their record signing who died in the plane crash. Ordered to pay. Contested it, put on a transfer embargo. Contested it, lost in court and ordered that they have to pay as transfer was completed.

A club could not exist at a professional level without being part of the transfer system. Also remember they will have transfer fees coming in from other clubs in installments that they can be prevented from receiving and the money diverted to the club owed.
Ah, the last bit makes more sense - assuming they are owed any transfer fees. I’m just a very cynical person when it comes to money owed, especially by organisations with a track record.
 

skyblueelephant76

Well-Known Member
Remember, they are starting on -2 as they still haven't paid for a load of players that they signed on their promotion winning season last year!
Cheated their way the the millions of the Premier League.
Nowhere near on the scale of Leicester though!!
They are up to date with their payments and have a further suspended points deduction if they do it again.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
He's just had a new set of teeth done at a Leamington dentist.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top