We had this debate earlier. You couldn't state anything that has been missed out or misquoted or was not factual in his article. All you did was mention his boycott and his aledged social media status, which I couldn't give a monkeys about. Maybe he has an angle or an agenda. Who knows and who cares. However, don't criticise a well written peice that is factual. We should all want the same thing on here. Unfortunately it will not happen without the court case being dropped or enormous goodwill from Wasps.