Sick Boy
Super Moderator
How is his bid any different to the others? Do you believe he genuinely cares about the club and the fans? He also did all the photos and everything else with the other clubs he was looking at investing in.
PH4 is the only one who has shown a real genuine interest in the club, stadium and the fans.
Much will depend on who gets CCFC Ltd and the GS. Then it will be down to what "deal" is on offer.
In SISU's world, everything is for sale at the right price, despite what Fisher says. If the Far East consortium get a foot in the door, it will depend on how determined they are to get the Club as part of their stated strategy to invest £1.3bn in the West Midlands. One of the Corporations made $12.7bn profit in 2012, so they could blow SISU away financially, if they chose to. SISU could not guarantee success in a legal battle, so I guess they would accept the right offer and walk away. (I hope !)
How is his bid any different to the others? Do you believe he genuinely cares about the club and the fans? He also did all the photos and everything else with the other clubs he was looking at investing in.
Correct. He cared a lot about Leeds at the time. Great pictures of him and bates if you google them.
We are all aware that any new owner would be in for business reasons, we'd just prefer competant owners. Wouldn't you? What is your point?
Well I didn't complete the survey, so if he invites me then that'll be on my list.
Of course everyone wants owners who will make the football club a success. Why do you assume that he would be competent? Is it because our mate Joe is trying to get him in?
We are all aware that any new owner would be in for business reasons, we'd just prefer competant owners. Wouldn't you? What is your point?
We don't know and with any new owner you never really can. But we do know that those we currently have are. I Still don't see the point in your agrument. It appears to be: New owners might be shit so let's stick with our shit owners.
It is responding to a comment that Haskell caress about the club and the fans. He doesn't not that this is a big issue. No one here though can really make a judgement as to the best bid.
It is more of a case of trying not to repeat mistakes of the past.
I would welcome a takeover of the club by someone who has no previous connections to the club. Why would you blindly back a takeover instrumented by someone who played a major part in bringing sisu into the club?
Notice how Psgm and Linnel are never available at the same time, they are clearly the same person
When did I state that I do back it? Bottom line is... I would welcome any new owner, I may prefer some bids over others but would rather any than what we have. I realise of course that it's a roll of the dice but when you're out of options you roll the dice!
It does not appear to be invite only- see here http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/fans-forums-2013-836931.aspx
It wasn't directed at you, but in general.
This sounds all a bit too familiar to last time we were in this situation. Personally I would rather us have a fresh start and have people involved who have no previous connections to the club.
Very interesting read. I hope that the Football League, Companies House, Administrator and others all all sent copies. THIS CANNOT BE IGNORED!!!!
If anyone wants to send this link to Company House the email address is:
enquiries@companies-house.gov.uk ask them to pass it on ! (I haven't sent it, sent enough emails and letters to date - let someone else have a go. Whose up for sending it ?)
As I understand it, approx £30-million was dealing with debt inherited when Sisu took over in the first place. That leaves £40-million, or whatever the precise number is, which when you consider ALL the outgoings of running the business is probably not far from the mark. Bear in mind, so far as we know, no one is owed a penny by CCFC, apart from the infamous Ricoh rent. So far as we know, all wages (not just players) paid, no debt to HMRC - in fact none of the issues that have caused problems at other clubs.
if they had paid all their bills we wouldnt be in administration!I disagree about the issue of impartiality. My question for you - a genuine question - is why does the precise amount matter? I'm not saying it doesn't matter, but whatever it is, Sisu and its investors have paid the bills. Stating that does not imply support for them or otherwise. It is a statement of fact, isn't it?
done!!!!If anyone wants to send this link to Company House the email address is:
enquiries@companies-house.gov.uk ask them to pass it on ! (I haven't sent it, sent enough emails and letters to date - let someone else have a go. Whose up for sending it ?)
Are you saying you have no influence on the content of a programme you present?
done!!!!
Hi Stuart
Have you heard a rumour that PHIV has signed a deal with the Higgs lot and it will be announced early this week?
Presumably that's what you've heard then SC? Where did you hear that?
The silence says enough.
It's amazing how many people can be so disrespectful to someone like SL who comes on here to answer questions as best as he can. He's like us, he doesn't know all the answers.
It's easy to be like that sat in your pants typing on a pube covered keyboard.
I've no issue with getting abuse myself on here, as I'm not strictly posting as me, only a couple of people on here know who I am. But when someone comes on in good faith, as themselves, the abuse isn't needed.
It's easy to be like that sat in your pants typing on a pube covered keyboard.
I've no issue with getting abuse myself on here, as I'm not strictly posting as me, only a couple of people on here know who I am. But when someone comes on in good faith, as themselves, the abuse isn't needed.
I agree sometimes people get a thrill trying to get 'bites' from people and throwing in subtle abuse it is a bit sad really
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?