I don't think any bidding party would be as naive as to believe they will go for nothing.
That makes sense to me, but seeing that sisu were prepared to lose £30-40m in the KPMG case - and if you accept what a lot of people say ie sisu want to distress acl - then maybe there is a different logic sisu are following?
Maybe, but I strongly suspect they will not be prepared to part with millions either.
I strongly suspect that SISU will end up buying Ltd back, and by regaining full control of the club it then gives them more options. They can either try to manage to club back to success (highly unlikely), or they put the club up for sale themselves, but with full control and on their own terms. Or they could liquidate the whole thing. Either way, they stand to recoup more of their money that way than they would through any sale of Ltd to a third party via the administrator.
Maybe, but I strongly suspect they will not be prepared to part with millions either.
I strongly suspect that SISU will end up buying Ltd back, and by regaining full control of the club it then gives them more options. They can either try to manage to club back to success (highly unlikely), or they put the club up for sale themselves, but with full control and on their own terms. Or they could liquidate the whole thing. Either way, they stand to recoup more of their money that way than they would through any sale of Ltd to a third party via the administrator.
If this is the case I don't understand why the hell it wasn't done sooner.
Indeed, if only they had. The situation has deteriorated very quickly though, and although I could be wrong, I am sure SISU will be looking for the least painful way out now and that is surely regaining full control and selling the club on their own terms.
Unless of course, they still have long term ambitions and delusions of success on the pitch and regaining everyone's trust - but I am sure they are not that naive.
They had the ability to do this in the first place. Absolutely baffling.
If sisu want to exit they just have to sell to preston h. I'd come back to the point that there is a rational explanation of sisu's action but only on the basis that they are not interested in on the pitch success or selling ccfc any time soon and their real aim is distressing acl. Hanging on to ccfc for as lon as possible is then not baffling at all
But they will never allow the sale of ltd to a third party via the administrator - they will want full control of the club and that involves buying back Ltd which I suspect is what will happen.
That then gives them time and options. Time to further distress ACL if they wish - but surely we all realise they will have to sell at some point because there is no coming back from here (in terms of regaining trust), but again, they will do this on their terms and it will not happen via the administrator - they will make sure of that.
I think your analysis is spot on. I've done scenario planning through work and what I'm trying to get at is that I desperately hope this mess gets sorted out asap, but is all sisu's talk of long term commitment and associated manouvering just a means of control and getting the best price they can, or is there potentially a very different scenario?
Why are SISU making plans for next season???
Could the "GS in CCFC ltd" be a red herring created by SISU???
If PH4 buys the CCFC ltd and the half share in the Ricoh and the GS isn't in there, it would give SISU the credence to move the Club out of Coventry.
I beleive Appleton knows where the GS is. My "Gut Feeling" tells me we're stuck with SISU....Hope I'm wrong!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?