What a boring thread this is turning into! I, and I guess many others on here, really couldn't give two fucks about politics, left, right, centre, labour, tory, commie or monster fucking raving looney! If you want to discuss boring politics, start a fucking new thread!
What a boring thread this is turning into! I, and I guess many others on here, really couldn't give two fucks about politics, left, right, centre, labour, tory, commie or monster fucking raving looney! If you want to discuss boring politics, start a fucking new thread!
It was. At first. Now veered right off, as does nearly ever thread that gets political.I though it was really good.
...you probably have the most political avatar on the forum.What a boring thread this is turning into! I, and I guess many others on here, really couldn't give two fucks about politics, left, right, centre, labour, tory, commie or monster fucking raving looney! If you want to discuss boring politics, start a fucking new thread!
...you probably have the most political avatar on the forum.
Not sure why that makes it ok for a group to stamp all over one person?So basically this guys big hard mates legged it when the numbers didn’t favour them like the cowards they are throwing their mate to the lions. Nice.
Thank god for Good Samaritans. Meanwhile one of his mates was pissing on a memorial to a fallen hero.
'We stopped somebody from being killed'
It doesn’t. Hence these guys stepped in after his mates legged it. The point is should the shoe have been on the other foot how many of the right wing protesters would have done the same for a BLM protester? Given these are the people we saw set about an innocent white couple just trying to have a picnic in the park minding their own business.Not sure why that makes it ok for a group to stamp all over one person?
Just the same as the c**t walking through a park giving it loads.
I agree, fair play to the bloke and his mates for sticking up for him.It doesn’t. Hence these guys stepped in after his mates legged it. The point is should the shoe have been on the other foot how many of the right wing protesters would have done the same for a BLM protester? Given these are the people we saw set about an innocent white couple just trying to have a picnic in the park minding their own business.
It was. At first. Now veered right off, as does nearly ever thread that gets political.
I am expecting it to turn to Brexit soon.
I'd like to thank the Spurs fan pissing on the policeman's memorial (sorry Julia, NEXT TO it) for everybody completely forgetting Cov fans in an instant.
Maybe so, but I don't spout my beliefs and ideals on this forum. I thought it was a football forum? (Although I might post something on 22nd July!)...you probably have the most political avatar on the forum.
Start of the grouse season?Maybe so, but I don't spout my beliefs and ideals on this forum. I thought it was a football forum? (Although I might post something on 22nd July!)
That's the "Glorious 12th" - of August, Otis! Mind you, it wasn't so glorious for my oldest brother. That was the date he kicked the bucket! :emoji_grin:Start of the grouse season?
12th AugustStart of the grouse season?
Sorry22nd of July is the date of the Anders Brevik attacks. Although it seems his likest fan on here has been banned
Lineker doing like he did with the stuff about our fans, jumping on and pushing something he doesn't realise isn't real.
It's dangerous.
It's as if they see things that fit the view they are trying to portray and just push it and retweet it over and over.Some might say slanderous. Get the feeling Lineker thinks he’s untouchable with the things he posts.
So basically this guys big hard mates legged it when the numbers didn’t favour them like the cowards they are throwing their mate to the lions. Nice.
Thank god for Good Samaritans. Meanwhile one of his mates was pissing on a memorial to a fallen hero.
'We stopped somebody from being killed'
Never been booked, thinks he's an angel.Some might say slanderous. Get the feeling Lineker thinks he’s untouchable with the things he posts.
Got to feel for the staff and management of the restaurant, why the hell they've been targetted for doing the right thing about some drunk blocking their drive through is really unfair.Fair play to the man, although with his statement of saving someone from being killed doesn't look good for the BLM - he's basically insinuated they'd have murdered him.
As for the new shooting case (Brooks) from the video he most definitely resists arrest and runs. Which gives the police every right to go after him. Of course the questions are did it require deadly force (he was running away so not a threat to the policeman) and would the same have happened if they were white? One of the reasons I don't like normal police having firearms - far too easy for them to just grab the gun and shoot.
I think that's been missed. There are a fair few cases of groups of blm people crowding around stamping on other people.Fair play to the man, although with his statement of saving someone from being killed doesn't look good for the BLM - he's basically insinuated they'd have murdered him.
As for the new shooting case (Brooks) from the video he most definitely resists arrest and runs. Which gives the police every right to go after him. Of course the questions are did it require deadly force (he was running away so not a threat to the policeman) and would the same have happened if they were white? One of the reasons I don't like normal police having firearms - far too easy for them to just grab the gun and shoot.
Fair play to the man, although with his statement of saving someone from being killed doesn't look good for the BLM - he's basically insinuated they'd have murdered him.
As for the new shooting case (Brooks) from the video he most definitely resists arrest and runs. Which gives the police every right to go after him. Of course the questions are did it require deadly force (he was running away so not a threat to the policeman) and would the same have happened if they were white? One of the reasons I don't like normal police having firearms - far too easy for them to just grab the gun and shoot.
Most of them are freelancers or work for a 3rd party production company, but if that's a rule then it needs chaning. Don't want to silence free speech of course, but he is a prominant face on the BBC and if he told people to vote Tory, dare say some would. Can't see how that would sit OK with the Governers.Lineker is a freelancer and as per the BBC rules unless you are employed in a news or current affairs capacity you can have and post whatever you want.
Never been booked, thinks he's an angel.
On a serious note, he should be removed from the BBC's payroll if he's pushing opinion or only one side of a story.
The guy caught pissing has been jailed.
Scandalous in my opinion. Hes a fucking idiot no doubt but jail for that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?