Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Gary Madine released (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter SlowerThanPlatt
  • Start date May 5, 2015
Forums New posts

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #1
...anyone?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #2
No thank you
 
M

malkitccfc

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #3
no thank you
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #4
Must be on parole.......
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #5
only stupot wants him

hes ok,nothign special. prefer a fresh face spearing attack for mowbray.

think tudgay wil stay anyway as squad member
 
C

ConnorDevine

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #6
wouldnt mind Joe Mattock though
 
A

Andy69

New Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #7
He's in talks at the moment at Blackpool,but I doubt he will want to join them with all the trouble going on.
 

ccfc_Tom

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #8
If it comes to a choice of madine or pros, madine every day. Didn't like how we played when he was in team but watching pros made me appreciate him
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #9
i still think pros had alot of bad luck and probably not that much worse than madine.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #10
ccfc_Tom said:
If it comes to a choice of madine or pros, madine every day. Didn't like how we played when he was in team but watching pros made me appreciate him
Click to expand...

I'm better than Pros and I'm crap, so Madine is better than Pros by virtue of the fact that he's not as crap as me.
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #11
ConnorDevine said:
wouldnt mind Joe Mattock though
Click to expand...

Ex Leicester and West Brom? Didn't he get sent down for ABH or GBH... Something like that?
 

skyblueheaven

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #12
No thanks, go all out to get Samuel's back.
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #13
To be fair, I've just gone back through it, and he was like 18-19 at the time, not sent down and seems to have kept his nose clean since. From what I remember, he was getting grief about leaving Leicester. I'm guessing he'd had a bit to drink, young and impetuous, and saw red. Not to condone it, just might be a little different to others we've been linked with that are constantly in trouble.
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • May 5, 2015
  • #14
Again, not sure he's what we're after. Ideally we will look to sign someone to play alongside Tudgay, but is a little more prolific than Tudgay
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #15
Wasn't really impressed him when on loan although have to consider the Pressley factor. Tudgay is better imo.
 

skybluepm2

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #16
Andy69 said:
He's in talks at the moment at Blackpool,but I doubt he will want to join them with all the trouble going on.
Click to expand...

Have their fans left the pitch yet?
 

skybluepm2

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #17
skyblueheaven said:
No thanks, go all out to get Samuel's back.
Click to expand...

Would love Samuel back, he would get 20 goals easily next season. I do believe that he will flourish for Reading next year. Steve Clarke is a decent manager and surely knows what a talent he has in his ranks.

On another note, I'm now gllad Orient went down just for the fact that the swine who broke his ankle (and didn't get booked) will now be suffering in a different manner. Karma!
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #18
No way. He hadn't improved since he was here before which says a lot.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #19
skybluepm2 said:
Would love Samuel back, he would get 20 goals easily next season. I do believe that he will flourish for Reading next year. Steve Clarke is a decent manager and surely knows what a talent he has in his ranks.

On another note, I'm now gllad Orient went down just for the fact that the swine who broke his ankle (and didn't get booked) will now be suffering in a different manner. Karma!
Click to expand...

Agreed massively affected our run in, not to forget the Impact on Samuels both in a sporting and personal sense
 
P

PTA

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #20
He's better than all of our current strikers, so yes.
 
S

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #21
No thanks. Does not work hard enough, showed a stinking attitude when asked to play up front on his own.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #22
Madine No!
 

LJC_CCFC

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #23
Under Pressley he was constantly isolated and yet still scored a few goals. Has ability, wouldn't be adverse to him signing on a short term deal if TM is here.
 

eastwoodsdustman

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #24
The whole Madine situation made me realise that Pressley had to go. He played Madine without any wingers and usually on his own up front. Madine Leaves and we get two smaller men in and he puts out 2 wingers! With a bit of service he'd do well for us I think.
 

SBS

Active Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #25
I rated Madine. His first touch, chest control and heading were better than any other striker we've had this season.

The personnel and tactics when he was here were shite.

Maybe the money would be better spent elsewhere though.
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #26
PTA said:
He's better than all of our current strikers, so yes.
Click to expand...

In that case we could also sign an onion and stick that up front.
 
P

PTA

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #27
CJ_covblaze said:
In that case we could also sign an onion and stick that up front.
Click to expand...
Very, very funny... well done.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • May 5, 2015
  • #28
I would sign him but not for longer than one season. I see him as being a good solid striker who will get a few goals for us. Let's not forget everyone thought Tudgay was useless in the beginning. Of course if we can find someone more prolific, that we can afford, on a permanent basis (no loans please), go for it.
 
T

TasmanSeaSkyBlue

Member
  • May 6, 2015
  • #29
Andy69 said:
He's in talks at the moment at Blackpool,but I doubt he will want to join them with all the trouble going on.
Click to expand...

Blackpool FC couldn't attract a busload of pensioners right now let alone any footballers with any brains ........I'll leave that one open.
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2015
  • #30
We want a gem bringing in...not easy as we know but I dont think that gem is Madine
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2015
  • #31
Yes...as long as you play to his strengths.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2015
  • #32
no, just no.....
 
W

Woodster

Well-Known Member
  • May 6, 2015
  • #33
Depends on how Mowbray or whoever wants to play - if TM stays and wants to play the same formation as he dd to start with, getting loads of balls into the box with a front 3 then he could be a good focal point. Not sure his attitude is up to scratch though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?