(Former) Academy Kit Man Charged with Sex Offences!! (8 Viewers)

Nick

Administrator
I thought that, but then he was in the academy when he came out by the looks of it and was sacked because of it so at the time he wasn't former :)
 

Nick

Administrator
Picking up on "supposed" biased reporting from the telegraph, against the club and
for the council.

Probably doesn't help when the Council's Head of PR advises to take advantage of rubbish local journalist and putting pressure on them.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I've just re-read the Feb article and hes right.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

True, but also if you follow links back there are 5 articles on this story dating back to April 2014, where finally there is a mention of Council ownership.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/pensioners-arrested-sex-abuse-probe-6906500
There is no good reason not to restate the ownership in the 4 later articles, utterly misguided to protect managers guilty of incompetence or neglect of their duty of care, cause that must have happened.
 

Nick

Administrator
Could be Philosoraptor.
TBF I don't get the comment as the Wisteria Lodge story Was well covered over a long period, you'd have to be blind and deaf not to know the two employees abused children in care at the Council run home.

But again:

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/wisteria-lodge-jury-hears-alleged-10761892

I am sure it is easy enough to figure it out it was council run, but it isn't made obvious like the Coventry City Sex Offender ex Sky Blues used to work at Coventry City Academy article.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
FFS this is borderline obsession, he probably is on here, he's fucking mental on there.
Fuck off, blame the person who commented on the CT. I had read the Wisteria Feb article, so wasnt aware of the disparity in reporting. I generally dont read the comments on thr CT as they're all a bunch of nutters but he makes a valid point, as back up by:

True, but also if you follow links back there are 5 articles on this story dating back to April 2014, where finally there is a mention of Council ownership.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/pensioners-arrested-sex-abuse-probe-6906500
There is no good reason not to restate the ownership in the 4 later articles, utterly misguided to protect managers guilty of incompetence or neglect of their duty of care, cause that must have happened.


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

dutchman

Well-Known Member

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Is a bit odd looking back on those articles that CCC barely get a mention yet in the article yesterday CCFC are referred to several times.

You hope that it isn't a deliberate thing but after last time, when we had Simon on here assuring us nothing was going on only for it to come out in court it was, it does make me wonder.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top