J
Unfortunately not at the home of rugby
http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/league-one/2014-2015/form-table/home
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I thought the home of rugby was Rugby,
I thought the home of rugby was Rugby,
That was before we became the first city of rugby.....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Isn't Leicester a city? And don't they have a rugby team?
I see what I did there......dared to have a did at wasps. More fool me
Must. Never. Criticise. Or. Have. A. Dig. At. Wasps
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
That's SISU you're thinking off.
I see what I did there......dared to have a dig at wasps. More fool me
Must. Never. Criticise. Or. Have. A. Dig. At. Wasps
Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
No, we can have a dig at our shite owners whenever we want.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
The home form is a problem though isn't it?
Form at the Ricoh is atrocious.
It is and I think that is for a number of reasons. Lack of fans, resulting in lack of atmosphere, poor pitch, opposition teams raising their games.
The home form is a problem though isn't it?
Form at the Ricoh is atrocious.
Err, to be quite honest stu, I think you must now be up to about eleventy billions digs at Wasps.Not wise to be bitter for eternity, mate. Life's too short.
Next to no-one wants Wasps here, but here they are and constant moaning about it ain't going to do any good whatsoever is it.
And must be a (the?) major factor in the poor attendances.
We're in April on Wednesday and we've had one home win since October - and that was a bit like a footballing re-enactment of the Alamo.
I wouldn't call 5 months an eternity Otis. I'm sure I'll become less bitter as time goes on, I didn't think it's unreasonable to be still pissed off about it 5 months into a 250 year agreement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I don't see the opposition raising their game argument at all.
Also all the other factors applied to six fields but the results there were better.
Yep, just 2 league wins in 15 since the wasps deal. I'm sure there is absolutely no coincidence.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Yep, just 2 league wins in 15 since the wasps deal. I'm sure there is absolutely no coincidence.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Next to no-one wants Wasps here, but here they are and constant moaning about it ain't going to do any good whatsoever is it.
And to think I get labled a mad capped conspiracy theorist on here :facepalm:
Unless the deal gave Wasps the authority to tell SP what tactics to play and which players to sign, I think you may be reading a little too much into that.
I don't see the opposition raising their game argument at all.
Also all the other factors applied to six fields but the results there were better.
I don't see the opposition raising their game argument at all.
Also all the other factors applied to six fields but the results there were better.
It's bound to if had an effect. It's all about marginal gains, 1-2% here and there can make a big difference, this is one of the reasons for british and team sky's success.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/19174302
http://jamesclear.com/marginal-gains
You could argue TM's vision of more club memorabilia at the training ground is seeking to bring in a marginal gain.
So in the same instance, there are things that have marginal negative effects - the wasps deal, wasps churning up the pitch, getting turfed out the home dressing room, wasps memorabilia all around the place, no access to the internal warm area, is all going to have negative effects, especially after the euphoria of returning.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
It's bound to if had an effect. It's all about marginal gains, 1-2% here and there can make a big difference, this is one of the reasons for british and team sky's success.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/19174302
http://jamesclear.com/marginal-gains
You could argue TM's vision of more club memorabilia at the training ground is seeking to bring in a marginal gain.
So in the same instance, there are things that have marginal negative effects - the wasps deal, wasps churning up the pitch, getting turfed out the home dressing room, wasps memorabilia all around the place, no access to the internal warm area, is all going to have negative effects, especially after the euphoria of returning.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I seem to recall posts last year, denying that moving to Sixfields would have/had any negative impact on performances.
Maybe we all just fit the facts to reinforce whatever views we already hold.
Although you are talking sense all these marginal gains are eclipsed massively by the major negative of the people "running" our club.
Its akin to the imbalance in how many times the money is spent chasing the individuals that have dodged a few hundred pounds in tax as against the many times fewer people and corporations who dodge millions in tax individually.
I thought the home of rugby was Rugby,
And vice versa.......
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
It is and I think that is for a number of reasons. Lack of fans, resulting in lack of atmosphere, poor pitch, opposition teams raising their games.
Why would the opposition raise their game?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?