I'd love to know how a select few know this fact.
Edit: I don't agree with all the shit that went on after it. People attacking police for doing their job, as the majority of them were, are scum.
And I can't believe some people are judging someone on what they look like!
Who seriously gives a feck about what you think?
So this bloke missed the rubbish served up last season and he wants to sue?
Didn't judge him on what he looks like.
If an officer is on his way to deal with a disorder if you were a genuine concerned citizen, would you be challenging him about his numbers.
I genuine concerned citizen would think that that would not possibly be the right time.
I am interested in what dongonzalos says, as I am about what you say...well until you write complete crap like the above.
Its a forum everyone has different opinions otherwise it would be fekking boring, so get over yourself and accept people dont all think like you do.
WS That's the most sensible and fair post so far. The bloke was in the wrong to start with and got involved in something he had no reason to other than to have a pop at the police. The one officer got a bit heavy handed which was again wrong and then all the chavs who look for any opportunity to have a pop at the old bill then caused the problems afterwards. They have the cheek to complain when they got a bit back having assaulted police and stewards. These are the same idiots who shout threats and abuse at the away fans but run off when they get a bit back
At the end of the day mr Winn went to watch a football match and for reasons only known to him forget this concerned citizen crap he obviously dislikes the law and wanted a confrontation.
Any reasonable law abiding citizen would have not even spoken to a police officer about his uniform after all does mr Winn challenge his postman for not wearing his correct uniform or a taxi driver for not displaying his badge or anyone els at work for discrepancies in their uniform or identification ?. I'm sure we have all gone to work at some stage and forgot our I'd card or part of a work clothing.
The officer was wrong not to be displaying his numbers which incidentally he had on under his fluorescent jacket and he will be advised about this I'm sure but mr Winn was only motivated by two things a dislike for authority and a smart lawyer who has now shown him the pound signs.
As for the idiots who then turned it into a mass brawl in front of children and elderly they should be banned from the ground for life
Yes I would challenge, only reason a copper will remove his numbers is so he doesn't get caught when he does something wrong.
I'm not a steward, police officer or anyone connected to the same or club. Unfortunately some people can't see the wood for the trees and don't like the truth from a non chav, non criminal , law abiding sensible football fan who goes to support my team and not look for a confrontation at any opportunity with authority.
Unfortunately this country is going to the dogs as the minority are now becoming the majority
Or hypothetically speaking he forgot his fluorescent jacket and borrowed someone else's.
He forgot his numbers.
Either way he should have been wearing his numbers. He is going to be disciplined for that.
I believe he was in his way to a disorder situation.
Do you in your heart of heart think that chap thought.
I am worried why that police officer is not wearing his numbers.
I am need to confront him about that whilst he is in route to resolve some disorder.
Or do you think he thought here us a chance to have a pop at a bobby?
It's all about risk and assessment of that risk. In regards to throwing people out for sitting in the wrong end, you have to look at the risk involved. If there are fans in the wrong end and they are behaving, keeping quiet and, if found out, are respectful of those they sit amongst, surely the risk is minimal. If there are fans sat in the wrong end who jump and cheer a goal, are abusive towards those they sit with or their team, they are putting themselves and those around them at risk. Its the job of the Police to assess that risk, what the potential implications are, and reduce that risk.
It's the same in this instance. From where I sat (i the next block and the same side) the Police were walking up the stairs to retrieve a banner (rightly or wrongly... thats another discussion). The tension was already ripe in the air. This fella had already shown signs of drink and was obviously hyped up with the atmosphere. He literally clocked the Policeman without his numbers and started screaming over at them. The officer who came to speak to him eventually calmed him down (reducing risk) which is where the cameras start to pick it up. Now from then on in, the Police became very heavy handed, particularly the one who put a forearm around the fella's neck. That is quite simply not on. The fan himself though, is not completely blameless though, as he essentially created that situation by displaying aggressive behaviour over something that was trivial. He was being anti-social and abusive towards the officers and around minors, again, putting himself and those around him at risk.
The riot that ensued afterwards was just pure stupidity. Was it the fault of the police that someone fell down the stairs in an effort to attack them? Of course not. Was it his own ridiculous decision to come rampaging down steep concrete football stadium steps to get involved in something that, in any other game, under any other circumstances, wouldn't have blown completely out of proportion.
There is no blame, so there can't be a claim. It's just a series of bad decisions and unnacceptable behaviour.
Have you even watched the incident on you tube?
Or hypothetically speaking he forgot his fluorescent jacket and borrowed someone else's.
He forgot his numbers.
Either way he should have been wearing his numbers. He is going to be disciplined for that.
I believe he was in his way to a disorder situation.
Do you in your heart of heart think that chap thought.
I am worried why that police officer is not wearing his numbers.
I am need to confront him about that whilst he is in route to resolve some disorder.
Or do you think he thought here us a chance to have a pop at a bobby?
Yes, but I am not sure why you are asking me.
Who gives a fuck what I think.
You don't fecking know what he was thinking.
He was harshly treated by the police as proven by the CPS withdrawing their case.
Why do you feel the need to slander the man?
Plum
I would prefer my taxes to not be spent on him.
Personally I feel if he had complained about the numbers in a reasonable calm manner.
If he was a genuine concerned citizen. Non of that ahold incident would have kicked off.
You can see by the video his complaint was nog made in a calm reasonable manner.
The ensuing police response was over the top.
The thugs who ran down knocking people over causing serious danger were wrong.
I personally would prefer that tax payers money does not go to this man.
I would prefer my taxes to not be spent on him.
Personally I feel if he had complained about the numbers in a reasonable calm manner.
If he was a genuine concerned citizen. Non of that ahold incident would have kicked off.
You can see by the video his complaint was nog made in a calm reasonable manner.
The ensuing police response was over the top.
The thugs who ran down knocking people over causing serious danger were wrong.
I personally would prefer that tax payers money does not go to this man.
The thugs you mention (the fans) acted in a 'thuggish' manner because of the police brutality, fact.
I'm asking a question about facts, not thoughts. You've either watched it or you haven't. I am not asking for your opinion, don't flatter yourself.
Taylor two wrongs don't make a right.
It still thuggish behaviour. You can class a reasonable fan behaviour if you want.
If I see someone getting arrested and I think excessive force was used.
I would report the matter. I would not charge down 10 rows knocking people over to attempt to attack the police.
So, are you telling me it's ok if the police act in a brutal manner? But a ordinary person resists, he's scum!?
Can you tell me where I have condoned the actions of the police. Or where I have called those people scum.?
No I haven't
Now can you honestly tell me if you were in that stand you would have knocked people over to try and attack the police.
If not why not?
You haven't criticised the police really...
You called them idiots, but scum has been used by a fair few posters, although the post was in reply to yours, my post was asking a more wider question. I see it as some of the people defending a fellow fan who is another victim of police brutality.
Well it depends what the context is, if I felt I was being wronged b the police, genuinely so, not the "what have I done!?" When it's blatent you did it, and I was being manhandled etc. I would defend myself, people have this misconception that an officer can do no wrong because he's in a uniform 'doing his job', the fact the police were at fault here, their disgraceful handling of the situation provoked the fans doing what they did.
Then I wouldn't have stampeded, but if I was near, and it was clear the police were in the wrong, 'I'd have a go' and defend my fellow CCFC fan.
You don't fucking know what he was thinking.
He was harshly treated by the police as proven by the CPS withdrawing their case.
Why do you feel the need to slander the man?
Plum
Why should this bloke get money that's what I don t get? Surely an apology, his name cleared and an assurance that the police will always wear numbers would suffice. After all that's what's he was losing sleep over in the first place
No win no fee and Jeremy Kyle have a lot to answer for.
At the end of the day the officer should have been displaying his collar numbers but he was only doing his job when he was approached by mr Winn who had his own agenda and wouldn't take a reasonable explanation. Instead he thought lets have a pop at the old bill because I don't like them and the rest is history
Basically the bloke got off on a technicality.
Basically the bloke got off on a technicality.
Some people on here seem to be comparing him to the Tolpuddle Martyrs. Oh dear.
Don quote Either way he should have been wearing his numbers. He is going to be disciplined for that.
You must be the only person to know that 'fact'
WS quoteThis fella had already shown signs of drink and was obviously hyped up , according to evidence given he hadn't had any drink,
so Rubbish
Torch quote Basically the bloke got off on a technicality ,are you serious or are you on about the officer who made the assault
As for police not wearing their id numbers it is well documented that police have previously and consistantly done this in volotile situations where they have been proven to act violently and against the law, so they can not be identified( not at the Ricoh)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?