CDK
Well-Known Member
That sums up my thoughts,also do sisu now move out again, negotiate,wait for kings takeover.All sorts of scenarios there in the meantime the staff,players and us fans have to deal with the fallout.Hate all this off field shit.
That sums up my thoughts,also do sisu now move out again, negotiate,wait for kings takeover.All sorts of scenarios there in the meantime the staff,players and us fans have to deal with the fallout.Hate all this off field shit.You really couldn’t rule that possibility out.
No one is applauding that possibility, it’s just let’s face it our current owners have form for being a bunch of lying cunts. I’d just like to know the truth because I’m not sure those statements are clear enough.Don't care about all that. It's done. Bottom line is there was no way that agreement was being signed pre-completion. To suggest otherwise is batshit.
You have Ashley and his cronies threatening to evict us with just days notice and there are clowns applauding this because the last 15 years blah blah
they'll be played at the current stadium, we have no interest in moving and they have not interest in evicting usChristmas? We've got a home game in 12 days and another a few days after that.
As things stand we don't know where they'll be played.
That ordinarily makes sense but this is Cov Citythey'll be played at the current stadium, we have no interest in moving and they have not interest in evicting us
okThat ordinarily makes sense but this is Cov City
This remind sme of the final scene in Zulu , where Michael Cane is shouting at the Zulus " what are you waiting for , COME ON !!!! " and the South African Boer says " Haven't you had enough, It's over were dead "
City fans to sisu
They had a choice and the power to.I cannot believe the council did not get in place a covenant of sorts on the sale of the new lease to protect CCFC but then we know what a shambles those morons are too.
Nor you Mr G !Sappala need to give up flogging a dead horse. Bad press never bothered her.
Nor you Mr G !Sappala need to give up flogging a dead horse. Bad press never bothered her.
But it's not a sublease, apparently, it's a license. If we'd all noticed that earlier, it seems we'd have all been having very different conversations!They had a choice and the power to.
As freeholders they could have seen the sublease transferred "as is"
Looks like they chose not to
Whatever it is, the council had the power to ensure it was transferred....But it's not a sublease, apparently, it's a license. If we'd all noticed that earlier, it seems we'd have all been having very different conversations!
Did they? I don't know the answer to that, I suspect you don't either as you're confusing sub-lease and license...Whatever it is, the council had the power to ensure it was transferred....
Yeah, but at least it seems the frothing at the mouth has subsided mostly now…But it's not a sublease, apparently, it's a license. If we'd all noticed that earlier, it seems we'd have all been having very different conversations!
The designs on owning it are no reason not to have signed the deal, it's amateurish to put your eggs in one basket like thatThis place is making less sense by the day. Apparently, SISU are now to blame for not signing an agreement with a 3rd party before it even owned the place, when they had designs on owning it themselves and while a takeover of the club was being negotiated? Who the fuck does that?
You think?!?Yeah, but at least it seems the frothing at the mouth has subsided mostly now…
They could have called in headlease for WASPs defaultDid they? I don't know the answer to that, I suspect you don't either as you're confusing sub-lease and license...
They couldn’t force SISU to sign the “mirrored” arrangement at gunpoint though. If SISU did decline that opportunity it’s on them.Whatever it is, the council had the power to ensure it was transferred....
And then it turns out that we'd have had nowhere to play anyway, until the mess that made was sorted out (You'd hope that could be done quickly, but I suspect otherwise!), and the poor bondholders would have lost more cash, and the local authority would undoubtedly have had to engage in more court cases, with the need to set aside precious funds during a cost of living crisis.They could have called in headlease for WASPs default
They could have called in headlease for WASPs default
The worrying thing is if he was even entertained as a prospective owner, then we really are financially in the shit.I maintain this is Storey’s fault, or Joys for ever entertaining the guy. If we had a serious owner in before November we could have tried to buy the ground.
The worrying thing is if he was even entertained as a prospective owner, then we really are financially in the shit.
Which raises some big questions about Big MikeThe worrying thing is if he was even entertained as a prospective owner, then we really are financially in the shit.
How long was this "mirrored arrangement" for? Guessing it was just until the end of the season?They couldn’t force SISU to sign the “mirrored” arrangement at gunpoint though. If SISU did decline that opportunity it’s on them.
No they didn't. And tbf to the club / SISU(!) despite my flippant comment earlier, most things have been done behind closed doors until others have broken cover recently.Did the club ever confirm if the exclusivity deal was real? IIRC their statement didn’t deny it, just said they didn’t break it.
Out of interest, has the current shitshow modified your enthusiasm for him as prospective owner...?Which raises some big questions about Big Mike
fuck em, they're dead
Our former slum landlords soon dropped their ‘Think about the potential job losses’ attitude soon enough…
The Sky Blue song would be ok seeing as Rorkes Drift was defended by the Warwickshire Regiment of foot.So, if we break out in a rousing rendition of "Men of Harlech", it'll all be fine???
No they didn't. And tbf to the club / SISU(!) despite my flippant comment earlier, most things have been done behind closed doors until others have broken cover recently.
I mean, I wouldn't put it past Storey to have decided he'd been in an exclusivity period just by sending an email saying he wanted to buy us!
They were in default the moment they did not pay the debt, they then defaulted again by not paying interest and again when they gave the NOICould they? Word at the time was it wasn’t until ACL went into admin that they could and even that would open them up to legal action from the bondholders.
When haven’t we been? I think it’s more a statement of SISU’s professionalism if they really did entertain Storey as a serious contender. Surely any half arsed due diligence on Storey would have dismissed him at the first instance, if they really did give him an exclusivity period they need their heads testing.The worrying thing is if he was even entertained as a prospective owner, then we really are financially in the shit.
Unfortunately soAnd Joy does have previous for treating nutters like serious people.
I always thought that council hater on Twitter clearly was ITK?
Hopefully he is right to tell us to be calm and duggins fucking off
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?