Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (38 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 951
  • 952
  • 953
  • 954
  • 955
  • …
  • 1494
Next
First Prev 953 of 1494 Next Last
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 9, 2024
  • #33,321
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm, CCFCSteve, shmmeee and 1 other person
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 9, 2024
  • #33,322
skybluetony176 said:
Did they ever?
Click to expand...
Pretty sure they did until the Miliband era
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 9, 2024
  • #33,323
Deleted member 5849 said:
Click to expand...
Is it me or is he giving off some Rolf Harris vibes in that photo. The picture on the board is clearly his equivalent of a Rolfaroo. A Sunakaroo.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 9, 2024
  • #33,324
CCFCSteve said:
100% agree that capital gains above a certain amount should be taxed at a higher rate. I think that’s coming as well. But equally you start putting it at silly rates and people will move, especially if their CGT is generated from shares, investments etc

My point was that even with additional tweaks etc to generate more from the rich, the lions share for improved public services will still be paid by higher (but not super rich) and middle income earners. so let’s not kid ourselves and have a proper debate about what we want and are all collectively willing to pay


ps if you’re blended tax rate is 40% you’re doing well for yourself ! ; )
Click to expand...

Not as well as Rishi!!

To be clear I’ve said I could and should pay more to sort the country out, but the feeling that once you got beyond normal PAYE type salaries the same rules don’t apply seems valid.
 

Nuskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 9, 2024
  • #33,325
Brighton Sky Blue said:
If the pay and conditions are so good why are we struggling to recruit and retain?
Click to expand...
Because they are perhaps maybe not
 

Nuskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 9, 2024
  • #33,326
Grendel said:
Raging
Click to expand...
To borrow a line from O'Day
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,327
PVA said:
I agree, I hope Labour will do exactly that.

All I'm saying is that literally everything is utterly broken and I think it will take a long time to fix.

Things might improve by 1% and the anti-Starmer crowd will say that's not enough, the Starmer backers will say it's a good start and we'll be back here arguing about it!
Click to expand...

I'm honestly baffled how anyone can see a small percentage improvement as a win for Starmer.

Going back to your smashed laptop analogy.
If I smashed your laptop it would take a long time to repair.
But if you made me pay for a replacement because I was the one that broke it then you'd have a working laptop much sooner.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,328
CCFCSteve said:
100% agree that capital gains above a certain amount should be taxed at a higher rate. I think that’s coming as well. But equally you start putting it at silly rates and people will move, especially if their CGT is generated from shares, investments etc

My point was that even with additional tweaks etc to generate more from the rich, the lions share for improved public services will still be paid by higher (but not super rich) and middle income earners. so let’s not kid ourselves and have a proper debate about what we want and are all collectively willing to pay


ps if you’re blended tax rate is 40% you’re doing well for yourself ! ; )
Click to expand...
Taxes do not pay for spending for the millionth time

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,329
fernandopartridge said:
Taxes do not pay for spending for the millionth time

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Ok, to balance out government spending, to take money out the system, help control inflation….however you want to class it, tax is still deciding what individual people or companies contribute towards whatever monetary process you believe in
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,330
CCFCSteve said:
Ok, to balance out government spending, to take money out the system, help control inflation….however you want to class it, tax is still deciding what individual people or companies contribute towards whatever monetary process you believe in
Click to expand...
That's better.


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,331
clint van damme said:
I'm honestly baffled how anyone can see a small percentage improvement as a win for Starmer.

Going back to your smashed laptop analogy.
If I smashed your laptop it would take a long time to repair.
But if you made me pay for a replacement because I was the one that broke it then you'd have a working laptop much sooner.
Click to expand...

Who said anything about a “win for Starmer” if child poverty decreases 1% that’s a win for children.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and Deleted member 9744

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,332
shmmeee said:
Who said anything about a “win for Starmer” if child poverty decreases 1% that’s a win for children.
Click to expand...

After the last 14 years being happy with that is fucking pitiful to be honest.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,333
clint van damme said:
After the last 14 years being happy with that is fucking pitiful to be honest.
Click to expand...

I mean I won’t be sad if fewer children grow up in poverty, no.

As I said before I think the disconnect is seeing voting in a GE as either a statement of your values, or a binary choice in direction. There is no magical third option where everything is gumdrops and rainbows. And when there was it was a) questionably viable and b) fronted by, quite frankly, a weird crank, which even if a wasn’t true made it seem like it was.

This is a bit like that poll the Tory back benchers put out that was widely ridiculed that asked something like “Who would you rather vote for? Sunak, Starmer, a hypothetical new Conservative Prime Minister that focused on your priorities”

Surprisingly the imaginary candidate won by a landslide.

There’s a couple of related phrases from tech startup culture that are appropriate here: “vapourware” - a product that only ever appears in PR campaigns and never releases because it’s impossible. “Get in the arena” - never mind saying what you are going to build, put it into the marketplace and prove it.

The left never ships. Always promising something better is possible but never delivering it.

Left wing politicians need to get out there and win elections and put in place working policy. That trumps all the Oxford debates and protests and working groups put together.
 
Reactions: Northants Sky Blue, Deleted member 9744 and SBT

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,334
shmmeee said:
I mean I won’t be sad if fewer children grow up in poverty, no.

As I said before I think the disconnect is seeing voting in a GE as either a statement of your values, or a binary choice in direction. There is no magical third option where everything is gumdrops and rainbows. And when there was it was a) questionably viable and b) fronted by, quite frankly, a weird crank, which even if a wasn’t true made it seem like it was.

This is a bit like that poll the Tory back benchers put out that was widely ridiculed that asked something like “Who would you rather vote for? Sunak, Starmer, a hypothetical new Conservative Prime Minister that focused on your priorities”

Surprisingly the imaginary candidate won by a landslide.

There’s a couple of related phrases from tech startup culture that are appropriate here: “vapourware” - a product that only ever appears in PR campaigns and never releases because it’s impossible. “Get in the arena” - never mind saying what you are going to build, put it into the marketplace and prove it.

The left never ships. Always promising something better is possible but never delivering it.

Left wing politicians need to get out there and win elections and put in place working policy. That trumps all the Oxford debates and protests and working groups put together.
Click to expand...

This is nothing to do with left or right, it's to do with the fact that after the last 14 years people see minor improvements as some sort of victory, I find it staggering to be honest.
And when I say people, I mean people like you who are clearly empathetic, they'll always be those who don't give a fuck about others, but people whose heart is in the right place but think that slight improvement is progress, its baffling.

You probably won't agree and I'm not going to say anymore but I hope as a country we wake the fuck up.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,335
clint van damme said:
This is nothing to do with left or right, it's to do with the fact that after the last 14 years people see minor improvements as some sort of victory, I find it staggering to be honest.
And when I say people, I mean people like you who are clearly empathetic, they'll always be those who don't give a fuck about others, but people whose heart is in the right place but think that slight improvement is progress, its baffling.

You probably won't agree and I'm not going to say anymore but I hope as a country we wake the fuck up.
Click to expand...

Yes. When things have been consistently getting worse for 14 years, then getting even a bit better is good. I really really don’t get this. You’d rather they got worse so that they might get even better in the future maybe?

This is a sequencing issue for me. You want to change politics voting in a GE ain’t it. The left lost that battle in 2020, the energy for a left wing alternative that should be put into making sure next time round we have a class A candidate, policy platform, and campaigning infrastructure is instead spent on making up “Kid Starver” and chuckling with Tories over “Beer Korma”.

At a GE, in the UK, you have two choices. To choose Tory of the two, whether passively or actively seems let’s say counterproductive. Unless you’re an accellerationist, which seems a shaky platform considering recent history.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,336
I wouldn't rather things got worse, I'd rather we set about undoing the harm of the last 14 years with the same vigour the tories went about siphoning the public purse to line the pockets of them and their mates.
I'd rather the public bought in to the above and got behind it.
 
Reactions: duffer and chiefdave

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,337
clint van damme said:
I wouldn't rather things got worse, I'd rather we set about undoing the harm of the last 14 years with the same vigour the tories went about siphoning the public purse to line the pockets of them and their mates.
I'd rather the public bought in to the above and got behind it.
Click to expand...

OK break it down for me. Walk through your ideal scenario. You don’t vote Labour because Starmer isn’t doing as much as you’d like. Let’s say you’re so convincing everyone who feels Starmer isn’t doing as much as they’d like joined you and also didn’t vote Labour.

What do you think happens next?

Or are you relying on people like me voting Labour so you can feel good about yourself without risking a Tory govt?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,338
clint van damme said:
This is nothing to do with left or right, it's to do with the fact that after the last 14 years people see minor improvements as some sort of victory, I find it staggering to be honest.
And when I say people, I mean people like you who are clearly empathetic, they'll always be those who don't give a fuck about others, but people whose heart is in the right place but think that slight improvement is progress, its baffling.

You probably won't agree and I'm not going to say anymore but I hope as a country we wake the fuck up.
Click to expand...
Things have gotten that bad it’s hard to not to see even a stagnation of trends as an improvement. This is going to be Labours biggest problem. There’s been 14 years of investment in getting NHS waiting times up, child poverty up, schools in such a bad state of repair, mental health services this decimated etc etc etc. Labours first task is stopping those trends before they can start improving them. That’s not to say that they can’t or shouldn’t be capable of getting some new manager bounce. A fairer tax system will have an immediate effect on making the majority feel a little better. It’s hard to believe that industry isn’t looking at the state of the Tories and thinking you can’t invest in the UK with them in charge, hopefully we can sort some industrial disputes out and get the NHS working to 100% of its available capacity at any time 100% of the time.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,339
shmmeee said:
OK break it down for me. Walk through your ideal scenario. You don’t vote Labour because Starmer isn’t doing as much as you’d like. Let’s say you’re so convincing everyone who feels Starmer isn’t doing as much as they’d like joined you and also didn’t vote Labour.

What do you think happens next?

Or are you relying on people like me voting Labour so you can feel good about yourself without risking a Tory govt?
Click to expand...

I'm simply not voting for a man or a shadow cabinet I have zero faith in, how you or others vote is your business.
I genuinely hope in 3 or 4 years you're on here giving it a fucking massive I told you so.
 
Reactions: duffer
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,340
clint van damme said:
I'm simply not voting for a man or a shadow cabinet I have zero faith in, how you or others vote is your business.
Click to expand...

...so after saying a 1% improvement in child poverty is not enough you're choosing it to go up rather than improve by that 1%?!!


 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,341
It's as if this brand of politics wasn't that finished by 2010 that it got a lower % share of the popular vote than even 2019.

2010 had the second lowest share of the popular vote in history behind 1983.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,342
fernandopartridge said:
It's as if this brand of politics wasn't that finished by 2010 that it got a lower % share of the popular vote than even 2019.

2010 had the second lowest share of the popular vote in history behind 1983.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Next Labour PM talks to only living Labour PM (who has won an election) really isn’t the scoop it’s being presented at here.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,343
shmmeee said:
Next Labour PM talks to only living Labour PM (who has won an election) really isn’t the scoop it’s being presented at here.
Click to expand...
One can only hope Starmer realises that Blair actually offered some messages of better times in 1997

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: duffer

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 10, 2024
  • #33,344
PVA said:
...so after saying a 1% improvement in child poverty is not enough you're choosing it to go up rather than improve by that 1%?!!


Click to expand...

What a ridiculous statement.
Given the current rates of poverty in this country anyone Patti g themselves on the back over a 1% decrease needs to give their head a wobble, and I doubt Starmer would consider that something to brag about.


We're one of the richest economies in the world FFS
 
Last edited: Feb 10, 2024

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 11, 2024
  • #33,345
shmmeee said:
I voted Street for WM Mayor. Cos the Labour guy was shite and Street is fairly apolitical for a politician. That’s the only time I think.
Click to expand...
He isn't.

He sends out a paper which is little more that propaganda for the Tories and himself.

Also a bloke I know met him at a function. Basically the first thing Street talked about was how great it was the Tories had provided investment. When this bloke said he was largely a Labour voter Street just walked off and ignored him.

Btw did anyone get involved in the 'consultation' on the mayor getting the PCC responsibilities? Not a fan personally.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 11, 2024
  • #33,346
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
He isn't.

He sends out a paper which is little more that propaganda for the Tories and himself.

Also a bloke I know met him at a function. Basically the first thing Street talked about was how great it was the Tories had provided investment. When this bloke said he was largely a Labour voter Street just walked off and ignored him.

Btw did anyone get involved in the 'consultation' on the mayor getting the PCC responsibilities? Not a fan personally.
Click to expand...

He’s a moderate conservative and champions investment for businesses very well. He’s working now with Burnham on rail infrastructure to link Birmingham and the NW after the HS2 debacle.
 
Reactions: StrettoBoy
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 11, 2024
  • #33,347
Grendel said:
He’s a moderate conservative and champions investment for businesses very well. He’s working now with Burnham on rail infrastructure to link Birmingham and the NW after the HS2 debacle.
Click to expand...
He's a Wealdstone fan who gets into fights at games, not sure how he has time for any of this
 
Reactions: clint van damme, Sky_Blue_Dreamer, wingy and 1 other person

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 11, 2024
  • #33,348
I think this is kind of what I've been trying to say on the problem with Starmer, except professionally written and referenced...

If disillusionment is all Keir Starmer delivers as prime minister, I fear Labour will shrivel and die | George Monbiot

It’s as if the leader is deleting all the reasons to vote for his party, and bowing to a destructive rightwing agenda, says Guardian columnist George Monbiot
www.theguardian.com
 
Reactions: clint van damme

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2024
  • #33,349
Thing is it’s all a bit Rorschach until Labour are in government. Maybe he’s a Tory, maybe he’s trying to win an election like Biden but like Biden will be more progressive than his PR, maybe he’s watering it down and will take the mask off and go full Blair. Until the election we just don’t know.

But to portray Labours campaign as right wing is just not true. It’s been massively over cautious and an exercise in refusal to commit to any spending or policy lest it fuck things up. I’m not sure it tells us anything.

We are gonna have to wait and see who is right.
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2024
  • #33,350
The electorate don't see Starmer's Labour as anywhere remotely close to the Tories


 
Reactions: Grendel

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2024
  • #33,351
PVA said:
The electorate don't see Starmer's Labour as anywhere remotely close to the Tories


Click to expand...
It is a bit worrying though if at this moment in time the public think the policies being suggested are left-wing. Especially as many of them just seem to be not changing anything, just being less incompetent
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2024
  • #33,352
PFI contract makes school pay thousands to cut grass

Disgraceful that this is still hampering schools.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 12, 2024
  • #33,353
Ian1779 said:
PFI contract makes school pay thousands to cut grass

Disgraceful that this is still hampering schools.
Click to expand...
Can't we just social media shame them into forfeiting/reducing fees?

Look at the c**** that want to take money out of educating kids for their own financial benefit.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2024
  • #33,354
Get synthetic, alternatively get the parents up there with their Suffolk's, good workout?
 
Reactions: dutchman
S

StrettoBoy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 13, 2024
  • #33,355
I despair for this country.

We have a choice between a Conservative government that seems to have run out of ideas and Labour led by a man with no principles who will say anything to get elected and who has done a U-turn on just about every major policy.

 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 951
  • 952
  • 953
  • 954
  • 955
  • …
  • 1494
Next
First Prev 953 of 1494 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • MartyA moment ago
  • fatso1 minute ago
  • shmmeee1 minute ago
  • CCFCSteve2 minutes ago
  • tisza3 minutes ago
  • fernandopartridge8 minutes ago
  • oscillatewildly10 minutes ago
  • wingy10 minutes ago
  • TomRad8512 minutes ago
  • RedSalmon12 minutes ago
  • ... and 2 more.
  • Total: 30 (members: 12, guests: 18)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • General Discussion
    • Off Topic Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?