Do you want to discuss boring politics? (18 Viewers)

wingy · May 12, 2021

Isn't it wonderful to see the property market overheat giving away taxes to inflate the asking prices of a fair bit of tat.
At the rediculous point again where you can't get a reduction even when you've had a full structural pointing out various serious fault's need addressing.
Estate agents are about as professional , technical or scientific as uber driver's.

Deleted member 11652 · May 13, 2021

@PVA @shmmeee @David O'Day @Ian1779

shmmeee · May 13, 2021

wingy said:
Isn't it wonderful to see the property market overheat giving away taxes to inflate the asking prices of a fair bit of tat.
At the rediculous point again where you can't get a reduction even when you've had a full structural pointing out various serious fault's need addressing.
Estate agents are about as professional , technical or scientific as uber driver's.

Estate agents are seen as the bottom of the property chain. And you should see the top!

Only moved in at the weekend, wonder if I should sell up and make a profit

fatso · May 13, 2021

shmmeee said:
The thing is the trust in Labour in these communities was economic not cultural originally. You voted Labour because you knew your shop steward or your union rep and would be drenched in workplace politics.

Once that was unhooked, the cultural chasm between the liberal middle class wonks and the conservative (small c) workers was exposed.

So getting their traditional voter coalition together now is virtually impossible. What do you offer the working man who feels like he has everything?

It would really need to be a Liberal not a Labour Party and I don’t know what that looks like in modern Britain or where it gets it’s voter coalition. But the Lib Dem’s seem to do well in the shires and the like that were traditionally Conservative. Maybe there’s a new coalition there?

All depends how long the Brexit honeymoon lasts I guess. The amount of political capital that bought the Tories can’t be underestimated. Thatcher was an equivalent and it took twenty years for them to be cleaned of that stench. So you’re looking at mid 2030s before Labour can rehabilitate themselves.

Grim.

Worryingly, I find myself agreeing with you again.
Kudos for recognising that change is desperately needed, rather than blindingly banging the same old drum.
The fact is, this current version of the labour party no longer appeals to people who put X's in boxes. It's nothing to do with class, wages or where you live, personalities, or anything else, the only message that labour has is ... "we arnt them"
And that's no longer good enough.

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · May 13, 2021

fatso said:
Worryingly, I find myself agreeing with you again.
Kudos for recognising that change is desperately needed, rather than blindingly banging the same old drum.
The fact is, this current version of the labour party no longer appeals to people who put X's in boxes. It's nothing to do with class, wages or where you live, personalities, or anything else, the only message that labour has is ... "we arnt them"
And that's no longer good enough.

I don't think may are saying things don't need to change. I'm certainly not.

The argument is it seems no matter which way they look to change people still don't want to vote for them. Tories seem to have done pretty well this election by 'not being Labour'. They do have messages (although they don't sell them very well) that would appear to appeal to the general consensus of what people say they want. Only to then go and vote for the complete opposite.

I'm not a Labour supporter. I didn't vote Labour this time around for any of the three positions up for grabs. I can understand that Labour aren't appealing. But what I can't understand is how that then translates to people voting for the Tories instead. You could vote LD, Green or spoil the ballet. Even just not bother. So what is it about the Tories that makes people vote for them once they decide they can't vote Labour instead of the other options out there? No-one seems to be able to answer that with anything that makes any logical sense.

David O'Day · May 13, 2021

fatso said:
Worryingly, I find myself agreeing with you again.
Kudos for recognising that change is desperately needed, rather than blindingly banging the same old drum.
The fact is, this current version of the labour party no longer appeals to people who put X's in boxes. It's nothing to do with class, wages or where you live, personalities, or anything else, the only message that labour has is ... "we arnt them"
And that's no longer good enough.

To be fair a lot of people vote Tory as "the aren't Labour"

fatso · May 13, 2021

David O'Day said:
To be fair a lot of people vote Tory as "the aren't Labour"

True. Maybe we need a viable alternative to 2 party politics, yes we have lib dems, greens etc, but I just dont see them as having the answers to anything other than 1 or 2 issues.

And if people are going to bother voting, they want their vote to mean something, so its only the 2 main parties that come into consideration (for the majority of people at least)

The worrying thing for labour is that if they continue their decline, they wont even be the second biggest political party.

I've been a floating voter for most of my adult life, and I voted for Boris at the last election, but I'm worried that his overwhelming majority is actually unhealthy. You always need a strong opposition to hold the government of the day to account, and we just dont have that any more, and time is running out for labour to make any inroads, they have 2 years to become viable and relevant or Boris will end up with 100+ seats, and that's a dictatorship, not democracy!

Deleted member 5849 · May 13, 2021

fatso said:
True. Maybe we need a viable alternative to 2 party politics, yes we have lib dems, greens etc, but I just dont see them as having the answers to anything other than 1 or 2 issues.

Lib Dems suffer from the system we have. They've had pretty decent voting shares over the past 40 years really (currently in a dip) but FPTP means people often vote for another party more likely to win that seat.

of course... this is why they're for PR

shmmeee · May 13, 2021

fatso said:
Worryingly, I find myself agreeing with you again.
Kudos for recognising that change is desperately needed, rather than blindingly banging the same old drum.
The fact is, this current version of the labour party no longer appeals to people who put X's in boxes. It's nothing to do with class, wages or where you live, personalities, or anything else, the only message that labour has is ... "we arnt them"
And that's no longer good enough.

I think you’re right in terms of messaging, but as a member I disagree that’s the truth. I want climate action, I want higher wages, I want better public services. It bothers me that Labour’s messaging doesn’t even speak to me as a member. I don’t even know who it does speak to.

David O'Day · May 13, 2021

Fair fucks Glasgow

Police release men from immigration van blocking Glasgow street

Ch Supt Mark Sutherland says the pair had to be let go to protect safety and public health.

www.bbc.co.uk

Ian1779 · May 13, 2021

Tories and their policies to appeal to the broader public. How they fuck do they get away with this shit?

Deleted member 4439 · May 13, 2021

What she said on radio 4 was clumsy, but the government have clarified that protection won't be given to holocaust deniers. That's at universities of course - what happens inside the Labour party is another matter.

David O'Day · May 13, 2021

Ian1779 said:
Tories and their policies to appeal to the broader public. How they fuck do they get away with this shit?

The same legislation makes unis sign up to the IHRA definition of AS which this would be against.

It's a weird mess of a bill

shmmeee · May 13, 2021

dubed said:
What she said on radio 4 was clumsy, but the government have clarified that protection won't be given to holocaust deniers. That's at universities of course - what happens inside the Labour party is another matter.

Then who will it give protection to? It doesn’t override the EA or hate speech laws.

Government by virtue signalling. Just like with ID cards.

David O'Day · May 13, 2021

dubed said:
What she said on radio 4 was clumsy, but the government have clarified that protection won't be given to holocaust deniers. That's at universities of course - what happens inside the Labour party is another matter.

Mate you'll believe any fucking shite won't you.

what she was the truth at that time until the government got a battering for it and then pretended it didn't happen.

Will it protect islamophobes? well what happens inside the Tory part is another matter

David O'Day · May 13, 2021

shmmeee said:
Then who will it give protection to? It doesn’t override the EA or hate speech laws.

Government by virtue signalling. Just like with ID cards.

Why argue with that floof

Deleted member 4439 · May 13, 2021

shmmeee said:
Then who will it give protection to? It doesn’t override the EA or hate speech laws.

Government by virtue signalling. Just like with ID cards.

Hopefully protection to academics and academic debate, and I simply don't agree that it;s virtue signalling but instead acting on a perceived need to protect freedom of expression. There's been some very wrong de-platforming. I applaud anything that can be done to stop that and its direct and indirect effect of freedom of speech and thought.

Deleted member 4439 · May 13, 2021

David O'Day said:
Mate you'll believe any fucking shite won't you.

what she was the truth at that time until the government got a battering for it and then pretended it didn't happen.

Will it protect islamophobes? well what happens inside the Tory part is another matter

Words fail me if you believe that they would like to protect holocaust deniers.

ccfctommy · May 13, 2021

David O'Day said:
Fair fucks Glasgow

Police release men from immigration van blocking Glasgow street

Ch Supt Mark Sutherland says the pair had to be let go to protect safety and public health.

www.bbc.co.uk

Don't know the ins and outs of this, but that's mob rule is it not?

fernandopartridge · May 13, 2021

dubed said:
Hopefully protection to academics and academic debate, and I simply don't agree that it;s virtue signalling but instead acting on a perceived need to protect freedom of expression. There's been some very wrong de-platforming. I applaud anything that can be done to stop that and its direct and indirect effect of freedom of speech and thought.

Freedom of speech = freedom to deplatform, there is no inherent right of anybody to be given time to speak to students. It is down to the freedom of the university to decide (with steer from students). More culture war drivel that you're lapping up.

Mucca Mad Boys · May 13, 2021

fatso said:
True. Maybe we need a viable alternative to 2 party politics, yes we have lib dems, greens etc, but I just dont see them as having the answers to anything other than 1 or 2 issues.

And if people are going to bother voting, they want their vote to mean something, so its only the 2 main parties that come into consideration (for the majority of people at least)

The worrying thing for labour is that if they continue their decline, they wont even be the second biggest political party.

I've been a floating voter for most of my adult life, and I voted for Boris at the last election, but I'm worried that his overwhelming majority is actually unhealthy. You always need a strong opposition to hold the government of the day to account, and we just dont have that any more, and time is running out for labour to make any inroads, they have 2 years to become viable and relevant or Boris will end up with 100+ seats, and that's a dictatorship, not democracy!

It might not be the most popular view, but I really like our electoral system (FPTP). It produces disproportionate winners and losers, but it mostly allows for strong governance. You have the odd decade where parliament is weak (1970s and 2010s).

To take 2019 as an example, you’ve had the stress of Brexit on the electorate and parliamentary deadlock with no end in sight. The strong Tory majority allowed the country to finally see Brexit through and alleviate what was becoming a toxic political environment. That’s the beauty of majoritarian electoral systems.

On the continent, proportional representative systems lead to more fragmented political systems, and that’s not a good thing. Frankly, would we want the political system of Germany, Spain, Portugal and Italy? Germany has had a grand coalition for most of the 2010s because neither major party had a coalition partner it found acceptable.

I’m not a Tory, nor a Brexiteer.

Deleted member 11652 · May 14, 2021

David O'Day said:
Why argue with that floof

Scared to argue with @SkyBlueDom26 after last time ent you. Little goon

fatso · May 14, 2021

Mucca Mad Boys said:
It might not be the most popular view, but I really like our electoral system (FPTP). It produces disproportionate winners and losers, but it mostly allows for strong governance. You have the odd decade where parliament is weak (1970s and 2010s).

To take 2019 as an example, you’ve had the stress of Brexit on the electorate and parliamentary deadlock with no end in sight. The strong Tory majority allowed the country to finally see Brexit through and alleviate what was becoming a toxic political environment. That’s the beauty of majoritarian electoral systems.

On the continent, proportional representative systems lead to more fragmented political systems, and that’s not a good thing. Frankly, would we want the political system of Germany, Spain, Portugal and Italy? Germany has had a grand coalition for most of the 2010s because neither major party had a coalition partner it found acceptable.

I’m not a Tory, nor a Brexiteer.

I agree with what you've said upto a point.

But when does a strong working majority tip over to the point where even a backbench revolt along with combined opposition prevents a prime minister bulldozing through legislation that is anti democratic?

For the foreseeable future at least, we are effectively living in a 1 party state. And that isn't healthy, and nor does it look like changing anytime soon.

Deleted member 4439 · May 14, 2021

fernandopartridge said:
Freedom of speech = freedom to deplatform, there is no inherent right of anybody to be given time to speak to students. It is down to the freedom of the university to decide (with steer from students). More culture war drivel that you're lapping up.

Ah, I hadn't realised that there was a voting system in place to execute deplatforming.

SomersetSB · May 14, 2021

Seems like a nice piece of work!!
Labour suspends union boss Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be ‘deported instead of refugees’

Labour suspends Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be 'deported'

TOP trade union boss Howard Beckett today denied he was a racist and refused to quit the race to become the next Unite boss – after saying Priti Patel should be deported. He has been suspende…

www.thesun.co.uk

clint van damme · May 14, 2021

It’sabatch87 said:
Seems like a nice piece of work!!
Labour suspends union boss Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be ‘deported instead of refugees’

Labour suspends Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be 'deported'

TOP trade union boss Howard Beckett today denied he was a racist and refused to quit the race to become the next Unite boss – after saying Priti Patel should be deported. He has been suspende…

www.thesun.co.uk

You linked the Facebook page of a
group who also want to deport her, along with every other non white Person in the country so you're obviously in agreement with him.
At least Beckett has apogised.

Bugsy · May 14, 2021

It’sabatch87 said:
Seems like a nice piece of work!!
Labour suspends union boss Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be ‘deported instead of refugees’

Labour suspends Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be 'deported'

TOP trade union boss Howard Beckett today denied he was a racist and refused to quit the race to become the next Unite boss – after saying Priti Patel should be deported. He has been suspende…

www.thesun.co.uk

you don't portray yourself very well at times

shmmeee · May 14, 2021

dubed said:
Hopefully protection to academics and academic debate, and I simply don't agree that it;s virtue signalling but instead acting on a perceived need to protect freedom of expression. There's been some very wrong de-platforming. I applaud anything that can be done to stop that and its direct and indirect effect of freedom of speech and thought.

But that’s the point. There’s been a couple of high profile “deplatofrming” incidents, and this wouldn’t have stopped them. Meanwhile the government are deplatforming anyone with views they don’t like in academia.

It’s total virtue signalling. Will do nothing to address the problem and they clearly don’t care about it anyway. Absolute dictionary definition.

shmmeee · May 14, 2021

It’sabatch87 said:
Seems like a nice piece of work!!
Labour suspends union boss Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be ‘deported instead of refugees’

Labour suspends Howard Beckett after he says Priti Patel should be 'deported'

TOP trade union boss Howard Beckett today denied he was a racist and refused to quit the race to become the next Unite boss – after saying Priti Patel should be deported. He has been suspende…

www.thesun.co.uk

Why do you think that statement is wrong?

It’s such bullshit and obviously factional. There’s nothing racist about saying the Home Secretary should be deported when she deporting people. It’s a standard insult.

SomersetSB · May 14, 2021

shmmeee said:
Why do you think that statement is wrong?

It’s such bullshit and obviously factional. There’s nothing racist about saying the Home Secretary should be deported when she deporting people. It’s a standard insult.

So if it had been said about Diane Abbott you’d all be shouting it from the rooftops.
It works both ways doesn’t it?
Or do you only see one side?

Skybluefaz · May 14, 2021

It’sabatch87 said:
So if it had been said about Diane Abbott you’d all be shouting it from the rooftops.
It works both ways doesn’t it?
Or do you only see one side?

Why would it be about Diane Abbott? What has she got to do with deporting anyone?

shmmeee · May 14, 2021

It’sabatch87 said:
So if it had been said about Diane Abbott you’d all be shouting it from the rooftops.
It works both ways doesn’t it?
Or do you only see one side?

No, I’ve had the same argument with people on the left. I hate this pretend offence by people pretending they don’t understand how language works.

shmmeee · May 14, 2021

Skybluefaz said:
Why would it be about Diane Abbott? What has she got to do with deporting anyone?

Because she’s a high profile BAME Labour politician.

You’re just as bad!

SomersetSB · May 14, 2021

Skybluefaz said:
Why would it be about Diane Abbott? What has she got to do with deporting anyone?
[/QUOTE

Well Labour have suspended him so must be something in it.
You can’t have your cake and eat it!!

shmmeee · May 14, 2021

It’sabatch87 said:
Well Labour have suspended him so must be something in it.
You can’t have your cake and eat it!!

Labour suspend everyone for everything, 90% of Labour internal politics is concocting racism/sexism/transphobia/homophobia scandals to kick the other faction.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (18 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 11652

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 11652

Guest

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 4439

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency