skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Am I missing something or by the very fact that these parties happened doesn’t that automatically mean that the rules were broken?
If you look at the rules that were in place at the time it would be basically impossible to have any sort of gathering and it not be breaking the rules.Am I missing something or by the very fact that these parties happened doesn’t that automatically mean that the rules were broken?
Not if you're a truth twister.Am I missing something or by the very fact that these parties happened doesn’t that automatically mean that the rules were broken?
My thoughts exactly. So how can he keep saying all rules were observed and no one point it out that having the parties in the first place is breaking the rules.If you look at the rules that were in place at the time it would be basically impossible to have any sort of gathering and it not be breaking the rules.
If you look at the rules that were in place at the time it would be basically impossible to have any sort of gathering and it not be breaking the rules.
I read about that. There's no way the public are going to go for the rules not being broken as they don't apply to crown property.
I read about that. There's no way the public are going to go for the rules not being broken as they don't apply to crown property.
They will never put the actual "rules don't apply to us" line out surely
They were clearly setting the scene to use that one yesterday through The Daily Telegraph but I would think they dare not go there now.They will never put the actual "rules don't apply to us" line out surely
Am I missing something or by the very fact that these parties happened doesn’t that automatically mean that the rules were broken?
It's more a point of principle in any case
This has cut through much more than I imagined. My family chat they’re all going on about it and they never discuss politics. Even my sister that voted conservative (already disowned) said she couldn’t vote for him again.
Buyer's remorse, though.Chucking your wife under the bus isn't a great look either mate
He’s got buyers remorse allegedly.Chucking your wife under the bus isn't a great look either mate
Yeah, fuck her, she's a piece of shit. But it's going to need someone further up the food chain to fall on their sword I reckon.
He’s got buyers remorse allegedly.
"Absence of evidence"?, if only there was police permanently on duty in Downing Street.Quelle surprise
Taking details of everyone who enters and leaves for security purposes."Absence of evidence"?, if only there was police permanently on duty in Downing Street.
If that's her excuse she needs to be pushed on why nothing was done at the time given it would have been impossible for it to happen without the knowledge of the Met.
"Absence of evidence"?, if only there was police permanently on duty in Downing Street.
If that's her excuse she needs to be pushed on why nothing was done at the time given it would have been impossible for it to happen without the knowledge of the Met.
"Absence of evidence"?, if only there was police permanently on duty in Downing Street.
If that's her excuse she needs to be pushed on why nothing was done at the time given it would have been impossible for it to happen without the knowledge of the Met.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?