I interviewed some graduates last week for our graduate scheme. They had to deliver a presentation on a topic that had been set. 3/4 out of 8 had clearly used to the same AI tool as they'd come up with the same solutions to the given problem in the same order.
I just cannot understand why anybody would devalue themselves that way? I don't understand why you'd just rely on AI. What do you think people are paying you for?
But if the benefit to the business is that it requires less labour then this is exactly what is being referred to.I'm not on about the stock prices etc. Just that it's not going to go away.
I can't comment on stock prices but only as somebody who implements it and can see the benefits for businesses. (Not the bullshit ai features on a toaster etc)
Strangely a very low priority for the policeIt would be good to read Morgan McSweeney WhatsApp messages - oh he lost his phone!
Certainly finding it all very interesting for when I start applying for positions later this year. I’ve so far only used AI for generating possible interview questions, I’m reluctant to use it to do more than that as far as thinking for myself is concerned.
The state of the job market being what it is that’s not a bad idea.Might also be worth thinking about ‘model answers’ to those questions as it may throw something out that you identify you need to research more about prior to actually going through the job hunting process.
But if the benefit to the business is that it requires less labour then this is exactly what is being referred to.
As far back as Henry Ford he realised that you needed sufficient workers, sufficiently well paid, to be able to purchase the products you are producing.
Now we're in a race to reduce costs to increase returns to shareholders. This involves reducing staff levels but it will only have a short term impact. As the report highlights, every company will do the same so the savings are offset but you have a huge number of people no longer employed and therefore demand drops throught the floor.
When I was teaching I used it to do things like report writing and general admin, saved a lot of time and freed me up to do better lesson prep.Most people use AI in the wrong way - it should be used to speed up processes and cut down on ‘busywork’.
Exactly. People will know about 2% of it and whine about it. (Not on about people on here).Most people use AI in the wrong way - it should be used to speed up processes and cut down on ‘busywork’.
Yeah I didn't use it to bullshit when I was looking either. I made sure my CVS and applications were written by me in my style.Certainly finding it all very interesting for when I start applying for positions later this year. I’ve so far only used AI for generating possible interview questions, I’m reluctant to use it to do more than that as far as thinking for myself is concerned.
Douglas Adams was right!Hairdressers and Nail Technicians are on the final frontier.
I used it to generate interview questions for a position I have now, it got some of them almost bang on and having had time to think about what I would say was useful.Yeah I didn't use it to bullshit when I was looking either. I made sure my CVS and applications were written by me in my style.
The power of ai was that I could have a list of skills, achievements and experience and then feed it a job description and say "pick bits out for me to talk about" or to use.
Then mock interviews as well were helpful.
Legal industry was an early adopter. We implemented a fair bit of stuff for law firms we have as clients.The initial problem I can see is that it will replace a lot of lower level tasks/roles so how will we get the next tranche of senior level people learning enough to direct, understand and check what’s been produced.
Reducing labour has been around for decades?
It's not even just about reducing labour, it's speed, accuracy, consistency. Especially in manufacturing.
Was talking to a litigator from a legal firm I know recently who was saying how difficult it is to recruitLegal industry was an early adopter. We implemented a fair bit of stuff for law firms we have as clients.
They are now suffering exactly that issue. They don't have the influx of junior staff so have killed the pool of recruits they need at the next level.
Joined at the hip to USA, not for me?
Think some interference from a certain government are present in this narrative myself , I won't be folding on this subject no matter how it's presented, Release the Epstein files in their entirety would be my go to.
Think some interference from a certain government are present in this narrative myself , I won't be folding on this subject no matter how it's presented, Release the Epstein files in their entirety would be my go to.
I've been a little hard on my daughter over the past few months, stating she had the opportunity to go this way at the age of fourteen, it involved an extended day of around four hours travel included,she showed the potential though,she still does if only she realised, doing ok though .Was talking to a litigator from a legal firm I know recently who was saying how difficult it is to recruit
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?